1. Association of Home Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation With Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Author
-
Zhen Wang, Claudia C. Dobler, Mohamed O. Seisa, Aniket Mittal, Manuel Sanchez, Lubna Daraz, Allison S. Morrow, Michael E. Wilson, Mouaz Alsawas, M. Hassan Murad, Bradley Beuschel, Steven R Holets, and Raed Benkhadra
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Lower risk ,01 natural sciences ,law.invention ,Positive-Pressure Respiration ,Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Internal medicine ,Positive airway pressure ,Humans ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,0101 mathematics ,Original Investigation ,COPD ,Noninvasive Ventilation ,business.industry ,010102 general mathematics ,Absolute risk reduction ,General Medicine ,Odds ratio ,medicine.disease ,Systematic review ,Meta-analysis ,Respiratory Insufficiency ,business - Abstract
IMPORTANCE: The association of home noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) with outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and hypercapnia is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of home NIPPV via bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) devices and noninvasive home mechanical ventilator (HMV) devices with clinical outcomes and adverse events in patients with COPD and hypercapnia. DATA SOURCES: Search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Central Registrar of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, National Guideline Clearinghouse, and Scopus for English-language articles published from January 1, 1995, to November 6, 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies that enrolled adults with COPD with hypercapnia who used home NIPPV for more than 1 month were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data extraction was completed by independent pairs of reviewers. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool for RCTs and select items from the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for nonrandomized studies. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were mortality, all-cause hospital admissions, need for intubation, and quality of life at the longest follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 21 RCTs and 12 observational studies evaluating 51 085 patients (mean [SD] age, 65.7 [2.1] years; 43% women) were included, among whom there were 434 deaths and 27 patients who underwent intubation. BPAP compared with no device was significantly associated with lower risk of mortality (22.31% vs 28.57%; risk difference [RD], −5.53% [95% CI, −10.29% to −0.76%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.51-0.87]; P = .003; 13 studies; 1423 patients; strength of evidence [SOE], moderate), fewer patients with all-cause hospital admissions (39.74% vs 75.00%; RD, −35.26% [95% CI, −49.39% to −21.12%]; OR, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.11-0.43]; P
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF