Search

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of everolimus in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma., Methods: A subgroup analysis of the pivotal Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of everolimus 10 mg/day in patients with disease progression after treatment with sorafenib, sunitinib or both assessed outcomes in Japanese participants. Results were compared with those for the overall study population., Results: The final trial analysis included 24 Japanese patients (everolimus, n= 15; placebo, n = 9). Median progression-free survival in the Japanese subpopulation was 5.75 months (95% confidence interval, 4.90 months to not reached) with everolimus and 3.61 months (95% confidence interval, 1.91-9.03 months) with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.83). Median overall survival was not reached with everolimus and was 14.9 months (95% confidence interval, 11.0-16.8 months) with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-1.27). Overall, efficacy and safety were similar when comparing the Japanese and overall populations. In the Japanese subpopulation, the most common adverse events with everolimus were stomatitis, infections and rash. Four Japanese subjects (27%) developed Grade 1 (n = 2) or 2 (n = 2) pneumonitis (all reversible and allowing for continuation of therapy, after interruption, steroids and dose reduction for both Grade 2 cases), with a lower pneumonitis incidence of 14% in the overall population (albeit associated with a Grade 3 incidence of 4%)., Conclusions: These findings suggest that the demonstrated benefits of everolimus in the overall trial population are similar in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel plus prednisolone treatment in Japanese patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC)., Methods: From April 2004 through August 2008, we used docetaxel plus prednisolone to treat 55 HRPC patients (median age, 72 years). Eighteen patients (32.7%) had measurable soft tissue lesions, whereas 52 patients (94.5%) had bone metastases. During the 21-day treatment cycle, docetaxel (70 mg/m(2)) was administered once every 21 days and oral prednisolone (5 mg), twice daily. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, defined as a reduction of at least 50% in the baseline levels for 4 weeks, was evaluated., Results: The median follow-up period was 30.1 months; median overall survival, 15.3 months and median progression-free survival, 7.5 months. During follow-up, 37 patients (67.3%) achieved the PSA response, and 5 of 18 (27.8%) patients with measurable disease showed a partial response. Among the 27 patients who experienced cancer pain before treatment initiation, 15 (55.5%) reduced their analgesic drug intake. Multivariate analysis of the prognostic variables revealed a significant association between the overall survival and pain (P = 0.033). Hematological toxicity (grades 3-4) included neutropenia (87.3%), febrile neutropenia (25.5%) and thrombocytopenia (5.5%). Frequent non-hematological adverse events were general edema (52.7%), general fatigue (32.7%) and sensory neuropathy (30.9%). Three patients died of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)., Conclusion: Docetaxel plus prednisolone treatment is effective in Japanese HRPC patients. The main toxicity is neutropenia, which can be safely controlled by outpatient treatment with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. However, the Japanese patients in our study developed ARDS more frequently than other patients in previous studies did.

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of dietary supplements in patients with early stage prostate cancers who are managed expectantly., Methods: Seventy-four patients with early prostate cancer, who were treated with expectant management, enrolled in the study. A mushroom mycelium extract was given at a dose of 4.5 g/day for 6 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in which the prostate specific antigen level decreased by 50% or more following treatment. The adverse events, change of prostate specific antigen value and quality of life were also evaluated., Results: In only one of 74 patients (1.4%), the prostate specific antigen value decreased more than 50%. Grade 2 diarrhea and grade 1 itching were observed in one patient, and patient ingestion compliance was maintained near 100%. The alternation of prostate specific antigen values was stable before and after treatment. In subjects with strong anxiety prior to supplement ingestion, these feelings were significantly alleviated (state anxiety, P = 0.0018; trait anxiety, P = 0.0099)., Conclusions: In this phase II study of early prostate cancer patients who were managed expectantly, a mushroom mycelium extract was an ineffective treatment for reducing 50% or more the patient prostate specific antigen values.

Objective: The health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after treatment of prostate cancer is examined using a new HRQOL tool. HRQOL, based on the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) and SF-8 questionnaires, was prospectively compared after either a radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) or a permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) at a single institute., Methods: Between October 2005 and June 2007, 96 patients were treated by an RRP and 88 patients were treated by a PPB. A HRQOL survey was completed at baseline, and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment, prospectively., Results: The general HRQOL in the RRP and PPB groups was not different after 3 months. However, at baseline and 1 month after treatment, the mental component summary was significantly better in the PPB group than in the RRP group. Moreover, the disease-specific HRQOL was worse regarding urinary and sexual functions in the RRP group. Urinary irritative/obstructive was worse in the PPB group, but urinary incontinence was worse in the RRP group and had not recovered to baseline after 12 months. The bowel function and bother were worse in the PPB group than in the RRP group after 3 months. In the RRP group, the patients with nerve sparing demonstrated the same scores in sexual function as the PPB group., Conclusions: This prospective study revealed the differences in the HRQOL after an RRP and PPB. Disease-specific HRQOL is clarified by using EPIC survey. These results will be helpful for making treatment decisions.

Objective: A previous paper reported favorable results of intra-arterial chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The current study will update those results., Methods: Between January 1992 and December 2006, 94 patients with confirmed muscle invasion were treated with intra-arterial chemotherapy and concurrent radiotherapy after an initial complete transurethral resection. Intra-arterial chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (Days 1-3) and pirarubicin (Days 8-10), and radiation was administered with the chemotherapy (2 Gy/session) with a total dosage of 44 Gy. The median age was 67.0 years. There were 60 patients in T2, 19 patients in T3 and 15 patients in T4. The median follow-up period was 72.9 months in the survivors., Results: Among these patients, 84 patients (89.4%) obtained a complete response (CR) and 10 patients did not achieve a CR. Between the CR and non-CR patients, the clinical stage and the existence of hydronephrosis were significantly different. The cause-specific survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 76.2% and 67.5%, respectively. The overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 66.6% and 47.4%, respectively. A Cox proportional hazard model showed that only the cause-specific survival rate was associated with a CR after treatment. The bladder preservation rates were 89.7% at 5 years and 87.6% at 10 years. Myelosuppression was the major adverse event but it was manageable. Non-hematological sever adverse events were rare., Conclusions: Bladder preservation therapy shows good survival and good bladder preservation rates. Clinical stage T2 and the absence of hydronephrosis are favorable factors.

We report a case of radiation pneumonitis caused by a migrated seed lodged in the lung after prostate brachytherapy. A 71-year-old man underwent transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. On the day after brachytherapy, a routine postimplant chest X-ray revealed migration of one seed to the lower lobe of the left lung. After 1 month, pulmonary opacities were observed in the left lower lobe but not near the seed. He was diagnosed with bacterial pneumonia, and antibiotic therapy was commenced. Two months after brachytherapy, the patient's symptoms, laboratory data and pulmonary opacities improved; however, an abnormal shadow (consolidation) developed around the migrated seed. Lung consolidation disappeared almost completely 12 months after brachytherapy without any medical treatment. The abnormal shadow probably represented radiation pneumonitis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of radiation pneumonitis caused by a migrated brachytherapy seed in the lung.

Objective: The health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after a radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) or a permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) was prospectively compared at a single institute., Methods: Between 2003 and 2005, 122 patients were treated by RRP and 82 patients were treated by PPB. A QOL survey was completed at baseline, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment, prospectively., Results: The general HRQOL was not different between the RRP and PPB groups after 3 months. However, at 1 month after treatment, the general HRQOL scores, except for general health, were significantly better in the PPB group than that in the RRP group. Moreover, the disease-specific QOL was worse in urinary and sexual functions in the RRP group. Urinary function in the RRP group had not recovered to baseline after 12 months. Although the urinary function in the PPB group was better than that of the RRP group, urinary bother continued to worsen until 6 months and thereafter it recovered gradually. The bowel function was not worse in the PPB group but bowel bother was worse at 6 months in the PPB group. In the RRP group, the patients with nerve sparing demonstrated better in sexual function than those without nerve sparing, but the recovery did not reach the level of the PPB group., Conclusions: This prospective study revealed the differences in the QOL after RRP and PPB. These results will be helpful for making treatment decisions.

Background: Docetaxel-based chemotherapy has been shown to be effective and well tolerated by Western patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). This study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of docetaxel in combination with prednisolone in Japanese patients with HRPC., Methods: Patients aged 50-74 years with measurable metastatic HRPC were included in this non-comparative Phase II study. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 70 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks plus prednisolone 5 mg twice daily, for a maximum of 10 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall tumor response rate, assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; secondary endpoints included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and toxicity., Results: A total of 43 patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. The response rate was 44.2% (90% CI, 31.2-57.8%), with partial responses in 19/43 patients. The median duration of response was 19.3 weeks. PSA responses were recorded in 44.4% of patients (95% CI, 27.9-61.9%). The most common non-hematological adverse events (of any grade) possibly related to treatment were alopecia (88.4%), anorexia (65.1%) and fatigue (53.5%). Grade 3/4 leukopenia and neutropenia occurred in 81.4 and 93.0% of patients, respectively; however, the grade 3/4 rates of febrile neutropenia (16.3%) and infection without fever (14.0%) were lower., Conclusion: The combination of docetaxel and prednisolone was feasible and active in Japanese patients with HRPC, with a manageable adverse-event profile similar to that observed in Western patients.

Objective: Selection criteria for active surveillance (AS) program of localized prostate cancer remain to be standardized. The purpose was to evaluate the validity of selection criteria and investigate the feasibility of this AS program., Methods: Patients meeting the criteria (i) stage T1cN0M0, (ii) age 50-80, (iii) serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 2y', which was defined as the proportion of patients who showed PSADT assessed at 6 months >2 years out of all the patients who chose AS. Point estimate of '%PSADT > 2y' was expected to be >80%., Results: One hundred and eighteen patients opted for AS and 16 chose immediate treatment at enrollment. PSADT for the initial 6 months based on four measurements could be assessed in 106 patients. Intent-to-treat analysis of '%PSADT > 2y' was 71.2% (84/118, 95% CI: 62.1-79.2). Pathological progression rate at 1-year re-biopsy was 33%. Fifty-four (46%) patients remained on AS for maximal observation of 54 months. General health-related QOL in patients undergoing AS was not impaired., Conclusions: The primary endpoint, '%PSADT > 2y', did not meet the pre-specified decision criteria. Further prospective study with revised program and endpoint is needed.

Background: To investigate the optimal treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer, a prospective randomized trial was conducted to compare radical prostatectomy plus endocrine therapy versus external beam radiotherapy plus endocrine therapy., Methods: One hundred patients with T2b-3N0M0 prostate cancer were enrolled and 95 were evaluated. Of 95 cases, 46 underwent radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection and 49 were treated with external beam radiation by linear accelerator with 40-50 Gy to the whole pelvis and 20-Gy boost to the prostatic area. For all patients, endocrine therapy was initiated 8 weeks before surgery or radiotherapy and continued thereafter. The long-term outcome and morbidity were examined., Results: Median follow-up period was 102 months. At 10 years overall survival rates in the surgery group were better than the radiation group (76.2% versus 71.1% for biochemical progression-free rates; P=0.25, 83.5% versus 66.1% for clinical progression-free rates; P=0.14, 85.7% versus 77.1% for cause-specific survival rates; P=0.06, and 67.9% versus 60.9% for overall survival rates; P=0.30), although none of them reached statistical significance. Erectile dysfunction was recognized in almost all patients as a result of continuous endocrine therapy. Incontinence requiring more than one pad per day was observed more frequently in the surgery group than the radiation group (P<0.01)., Conclusions: For the treatment of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer, when combined with endocrine therapy, either radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy demonstrated favorable long-term outcomes. The radiation dose of 60-70 Gy might not be enough for the local treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer.

Background: Until 1998 in Japan, very few institutions were treating prostate cancer solely with radiotherapy (RT) >70 Gy and most were using < or =65 Gy in combination with hormone therapy. The present study reports the long-term results of RT combined with hormone therapy for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer., Methods: We investigated 57 patients who were treated by external beam RT plus hormone therapy (median age 79 years, median prostate-specific antigen concentration 15.0 ng/ml) between 1992 and 1998. Patients received 40 Gy of radiation to the pelvis and an additional 20 Gy as a prostatic boost. Hormone therapy was begun on the first day of irradiation and continued thereafter., Results: The median follow-up was 93.3 months and the 5 and 10 year actual overall survival rates were 67.8 and 32.6%, respectively, with 5 and 10 year cause-specific survival rates of 97.9 and 95.0%, respectively. The expected survival rate was 66.2% at 5 years, and overall survival was above expected survival. Only one patient developed severe proctitis (Grade 3). The 5 year occurrence of Grade 1/2 genitourinary toxicity was 23.2%., Conclusions: Combined RT and hormone therapy has a good long-term outcome without severe adverse events. The overall survival rate compares well with the expected survival rate.

Background: We assessed predictors of response to salvage radiotherapy (sRT) in patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after radical prostatectomy., Methods: A total of 21 patients receiving sRT for PSA recurrence without systemic progression after radical prostatectomy had medical records available for retrospective review. We defined sRT as external beam radiotherapy for patients with a continuous increase in PSA level > or =0.2 ng/ml after radical prostatectomy. Response was defined as achievement of a PSA nadir of < or =0.1 ng/ml. Various pre-treatment parameters were evaluated retrospectively., Results: The median follow-up period after sRT was 38 months. Of the 21 patients, 15 were good responders (71%). The only predictive factor was PSA doubling time (PSADT). Age and PSA level at diagnosis, Gleason score and surgical margin status were not significant predictors of response. The median PSADT in responders was 6.2 months versus 1.9 months in non-responders (P = 0.019). The patients with a PSADT of > or =5 months were all responders., Conclusion: PSADT appears to be a good predictor of response to sRT. sRT was especially effective when PSADT was > or =5 months.