Search

Background: The treatment of lung cancer has made dramatic progress in the past decade, but due to the high cost of drugs, the total pharmaceutical cost has been rising explosively. There are currently no data available in Japan on which regimens are used, to what extent they are used, and what their total cost is., Methods: Sixty Japanese centers belonging to the Lung Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group were surveyed for information about the first-line treatment for advanced lung cancer in practice from July 2021 to June 2022. Three types of cancer were included: driver gene mutation-negative NSCLC, EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC)., Results: Recent treatment costs for ICIs or ICI plus chemotherapy were about 20-55 times higher than those for conventional chemotherapy. Of the 3738 patients with driver gene aberration-negative NSCLC, 2573 (68.8%) received treatments with monthly cost of 500 000 Japanese yen (JPY) or more; 2555 (68.4%) received ICI therapy. Of the 1486 patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, 1290 (86.8%) received treatments with a monthly cost of 500 000 JPY or more; 1207 (81.2%) received osimertinib. ICI treatments with a monthly cost of 500 000 JPY or more were administered to 607 (56.3%) of 1079 patients with ES-SCLC. Elderly NSCLC patients received slightly more high-cost treatment than younger patients., Conclusion: Recent treatments cost many times more than conventional chemotherapy. This study revealed that high-cost treatments were widely used in advanced lung cancer and some of high-cost treatments were used despite the lack of clear evidence. Physicians should pay attention to the cost of treatments they use., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Osimertinib is the standard of care for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Dose-toxicity has been previously reported, but no dose-response data within the range of 20-240 mg daily (mg/d). Thus, the current 80 mg/d dosing might be too high for elderly Japanese patients with an average body weight of only 50 kg, resulting in excessive toxicity and cost. We therefore initiated a study to investigate whether osimertinib at 40 mg/d is non-inferior to 80 mg/d in patients with advanced or recurrent epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer aged ≥70 years, using a regression discontinuity design. Osimertinib is administered at 40 mg/d for body weight ≤50 kg, and 80 mg/d for body weight >50 kg. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Sample size is 550 patients, based on a non-inferiority margin of the progression-free survival hazard ratio 1.333, 0.10 one-sided type I error and 80% power., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including nivolumab, are essential agents for treating non-small cell lung cancer. However, predictive markers are currently lacking, especially using factors based on patient-reported outcomes., Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of 244 patients with advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer treated with second- or later-line nivolumab from August 2016 to December 2017. Patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life, were evaluated by the EQ-5D-5L before and during nivolumab treatment. To predict the efficacy of nivolumab during the early treatment phase, we also analyzed the patients' clinical characteristics, responses and immune-related adverse events at 9 weeks of therapy. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate at 25 weeks after the initiation of nivolumab., Results: The objective response and disease control rates at 25 weeks were 18.5 and 41.2%, respectively. The emergence of immune-related adverse events at 9 weeks did not significantly affect the disease control rate at 6 months. The response at 9 weeks and patient-reported quality of life were potentially predictive of disease control at week 25. Disease control on week 9 and patients-reported outcomes were potential predictive factors for the overall survival., Conclusions: This study found no new baseline factors predicting the outcome of nivolumab treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, but response to nivolumab was a robust predictor of overall efficacy. In addition, patient-perceived quality of life could predict the durable efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: We conducted a post-marketing surveillance study to evaluate the clinical tolerability and safety of atezolizumab in Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: This prospective, observational post-marketing cohort study was conducted in NSCLC patients who received atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks at 770 facilities in Japan between April 18, 2018, and March 31, 2020 (study number UMIN000031978). Case report forms were completed, recording patient characteristics, treatment details, adverse events, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), their severity, onset and outcomes. Follow-up was for 12 months or until atezolizumab discontinuation., Results: Overall, 2570 patients were included, median age was 69.0 years, and 69.9% were males. ADRs were reported in 29.1% of patients, most commonly pyrexia (4.2%). Grade ≥ 3 ADRs occurred in 9.7% of patients aged <75 and 9.7% of those aged ≥75 years. The incidence of Grade ≥ 3 ADRs was not affected by the number of lines of previous treatment or the presence or history of an autoimmune disorder. Immune-related ADRs of interest that occurred in >1% of patients were interstitial lung disease (ILD; 4.4%), endocrine disorder (4.3%), and hepatic dysfunction (2.8%). ILD was significantly more common in patients with a history of, or concurrent, ILD versus those without (P ≤ 0.001). Risk factors of Grade ≥ 3 ADRs were a history of, or concurrent, ILD. Grade 5 ADRs occurred in 35 patients, 11 of whom had concurrent ILD., Conclusions: This large cohort study confirmed the clinical tolerability of atezolizumab in a real-world group of Japanese patients with NSCLC., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Adjuvant tegafur/uracil (UFT) chemotherapy is recommended for patients with completely resected Stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan. A Phase III trial, the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0707, comparing the survival benefit of UFT and S-1 (tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil) for this population is being conducted. However, the selection of patients in the randomized clinical trial (RCT) may not represent the real-world population. The present study aimed to investigate the pattern of care for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected NSCLC., Methods: Patients with completely resected pathological Stage I (T1 > 2 cm and T2 in 6th TNM edition) NSCLC eligible for the JCOG0707 trial but excluded from it during the enrollment period (2008-13) were eligible for this study. Physicians from institutions that participated in the JCOG0707 retrospectively assessed the medical records of each patient., Results: This study enrolled 5006 patients, 85% of those initially considered for participation in the JCOG0707 trial (5006 of 5923 patients). Among them, 2389 were ineligible for the trial and 2617 had not been enrolled despite being eligible. The most frequent reason for non-enrollment despite eligibility was the decline in patients' participation, and the major reasons for trial ineligibility were concomitant malignancy and comorbidities. Of all the patients enrolled in our study, 1659 received adjuvant chemotherapy, mainly UFT., Conclusions: Our study indicates that only 15% of the real-world patients with completely resected NSCLC were enrolled into the adjuvant chemotherapy RCT, and among those not participating in the trial, one-third received adjuvant chemotherapy.

Objective: This Phase I study (NCT01605916) investigated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile of selumetinib plus docetaxel as second-line therapy in Japanese patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), or selumetinib monotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced solid malignancies., Methods: All enrolled patients received single-dose selumetinib 25, 50 or 75 mg, followed by a 3-day washout. Combination therapy cohorts then started a 21-day cycle of docetaxel 60 mg/m2 plus selumetinib 25 or 75 mg twice-daily (BID) on Day 1. Thereafter, selumetinib BID continued for 20 days; patients received ≤6 cycles. Following single-dosing, monotherapy cohorts underwent a 21-day cycle of selumetinib 25, 50 or 75 mg BID., Results: Thirty-three patients were enrolled and 25 assigned to treatment (combination, n = 8; monotherapy, n = 17). Most frequent adverse events (AEs) included: vomiting, decreased appetite, diarrhea, nausea and stomatitis (combination cohorts); gastrointestinal disorders, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (monotherapy cohorts). Grade 3 dose-limiting toxicities: febrile neutropenia, causally related to combination therapy (n = 3); pneumonitis, selumetinib 50 mg monotherapy (n = 1). Selumetinib 75 mg monotherapy and selumetinib 25 mg plus docetaxel 60 mg/m2 were tolerated; selumetinib 75 mg plus docetaxel 60 mg/m2 was not tolerated. Selumetinib pharmacokinetic profile was similar when administered as a monotherapy or in combination with docetaxel., Conclusions: Selumetinib 75 mg monotherapy was tolerated in Japanese patients with NSCLC. Due to the overall selumetinib AE profile, the maximum tolerated dose was not determined for combination therapy or monotherapy. Selumetinib 75 mg BID plus docetaxel 60 mg/m2 was not tolerated in this patient population., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: Most of the previous studies of amrubicin in patients with previously treated small-cell lung cancer were conducted at a dose of 40 mg/m(2). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of amrubicin at a dose of 45 mg/m(2) in patients with relapsed or refractory small-cell lung cancer., Methods: Previously treated small-cell lung cancer patients were eligible. Amrubicin at a dose of 45 mg/m(2) was administered on Days 1-3 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the response rate., Results: From June 2003 to January 2005, 35 patients were enrolled, of whom 34 received this study treatment. Four cycles or more could be administered in 21 patients (62%). Dose reduction was required in 15 (52%) of the 29 patients who had received two cycles or more. Three complete responses and 15 partial responses were observed among the 34 treated patients, yielding a response rate of 53% (95% confidence interval, 35-71%). Median progression-free survival of the patients was 4.4 months (95% confidence interval, 2.4-5.1 months). Median survival time was 8.2 months (95% confidence interval, 6.6-10.0 months) and 1-year survival rate was 24% (95% confidence interval, 9-39%). Grade 3/4 leukopenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 76, 97 and 38% of the patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 12 patients (35%), and one patient died from pneumonia., Conclusions: While amrubicin at a dose of 45 mg/m(2) showed high response rate for both sensitive and refractory relapse, the incidence of febrile neutropenia was also high. The utility of amrubicin at 45 mg/m(2) might accordingly be limited., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: A generic cisplatin formulation has replaced the brand-name formulation since November 2003 in our hospital. We retrospectively assessed the renal toxicity caused by the brand-name and generic cisplatin formulations., Methods: The medical records of patients with thoracic malignancy who were treated at our hospital between November 2000 and April 2008 were reviewed. In total, 1296 eligible patients received 80 mg/m(2) of cisplatin: 499 patients were treated with the brand-name cisplatin formulation before November 2003 (Group 1) and 797 patients were treated with the generic formulation after November 2003 (Group 2). We compared the maximum serum creatinine level after chemotherapy in the two groups., Results: The patient characteristics, including age, sex and performance status, and pretreatment serum creatinine levels were well balanced between the two groups. More patients received four cycles of chemotherapy in Group 2 (P < 0.0001). The median (range) of the maximum serum creatinine levels during all the chemotherapy cycles were 1.1 (0.5-4.1) mg/dl and 1.1 (0.5-4.4) mg/dl in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.0237). The incidence of grade 0 serum creatinine elevations decreased from 47% to 39%, while that of grade 1 serum creatinine elevations increased from 32% to 41% (P = 0.0094). The incidence rates of grade 2 or 3 serum creatinine elevations were similar (21 vs. 20%). The time to serum creatinine elevation was also similar in Groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.161)., Conclusion: Although grade 1 maximum serum creatinine level was more common in the generic cisplatin formulation group, this was attributed to the larger number of patients receiving four cycles of chemotherapy in this group.

Objective: Pretreatment computerized tomography (CT) films of the chest was studied to clarify the influence of interstitial shadow on developing interstitial lung disease (ILD)., Methods: Eligible patients were those lung cancer patients who started to receive first-line chemotherapy between October 2001 and March 2004. Patients who received thoracic radiotherapy to the primary lesion, mediastinum, spinal or rib metastases were excluded. We reviewed pretreatment conventional CT and plain X-ray films of the chest. Ground-glass opacity, consolidation or reticular shadow without segmental distribution was defined as interstitial shadow, with this event being graded as mild, moderate or severe. If interstitial shadow was detected on CT films of the chest, but not via plain chest X-ray, it was graded as mild. Patients developing ILD were identified from medial records., Results: A total of 502 patients were eligible. Mild, moderate and severe interstitial shadow was identified in 7, 8 and 5% of patients, respectively. A total of 188 patients (37%) received tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment, namely gefitinib or erlotinib. Twenty-six patients (5.2%) developed ILD either during or after chemotherapy. Multivariate analyses revealed that interstitial shadow on CT films of the chest and treatment history with TKI were associated with the onset of ILD., Conclusions: It is recommended that patients with interstitial shadow on chest CT are excluded from future clinical trials until this issue is further clarified, as it is anticipated that use of chemotherapeutic agents frequently mediate onset of ILD in this context.