Search

Objectives The aims of this study were to establish delay times from articular symptoms onset to first rheumatologist consultation, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosis, and treatment initiation with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy and to assess the impact of delayed diagnosis on structural damage. Methods This was an observational cohort study. Rheumatoid arthritis adult patients treated in a private health system between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2016, were included. Electronic medical records were reviewed to obtain clinical and demographic data, dates of first disease symptom, diagnosis, and date of first treatment with DMARDs. Physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire) and structural damage (Sharp score modified by van der Heijde) were also assessed. Results Two hundred forty-six patients (81% female), with a mean age of 67.25 (standard deviation [SD], 14.53) years, were included. At the end of follow-up period, median Health Assessment Questionnaire (n = 145) and radiological scores (n = 171) were 0.125 (interquartile range, 0-0.87) and 15 (interquartile range, 6-33), respectively. A mean of 9.2 (SD, 20) months (median, 3 months) elapsed from the first disease symptom to rheumatologist consultation, 14.2 (SD, 24) months (median, 4.8 months) to RA diagnosis, and 16.9 (SD, 25.4) months (median, 7 months) to treatment initiation with DMARDs. Significantly greater structural damage was found in patients with a diagnosis delay of more than 12 months (n = 70) (p = 0.0325). Conclusions Despite good access to medical consultation in a private health system, there is still a delay to RA diagnosis and to start pharmacological therapy. A delay of more than 12 months was significantly associated with greater radiological damage after 5 years of follow-up.

Objectives The aims of this study were to compare learned helplessness (LH) and perceived self-efficacy (SE) in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to assess their correlation with functional disability, level of perceived pain, and fatigue. Methods This multicenter, cross-sectional study included consecutive patients (aged ≥18 years) with RA, according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria, and FM, according to 2010 American College of Rheumatology criteria. Learned helplessness was measured by the Rheumatology Attitude Index, Spanish version; SE with the Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale, Spanish version; functional capacity with the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Argentine version; depression with Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale 7-item version and perceived pain and fatigue by the visual analog scale. Disease activity was measured by the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and disease impact with the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). Results A total of 215 patients, 100 with FM and 115 with RA, were included. Mean age was 59 (SD, 14) years and 58 (SD, 13) years for FM and RA, patients respectively. Whereas LH and depression were significantly higher, SE was significantly lower in FM patients. We found a positive correlation between LH and HAQ, pain, depression, fatigue, FIQ, and CDAI in FM and RA patients. We observed a negative correlation between SE and HAQ, pain, depression, fatigue, FIQ (FM), and CDAI (RA) in both groups. Conclusions Both LH and SE correlate significantly with functional capacity, perceived pain, disease activity, and disease impact in RA and FM patients. Learned helplessness was higher in patients with active disease or high disease impact, as opposed to those in remission or with low disease impact, and the reverse was true for SE. Patients with FM had significantly more LH, pain, fatigue, and depression and less SE compared with those with RA.