Search

Background and Aim Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive and curative local treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, serious concerns remain regarding critical recurrences such as metastasis, dissemination, and/or seeding due to RFA. In August 2006, we introduced selective feeding artery ablation before tumor ablation to reduce the risk of critical recurrence by blocking tumor blood flow. The aim of the present study was to clarify whether feeding artery ablation before tumor ablation can reduce the risk of critical recurrence after RFA. Methods This study retrospectively analyzed 279 patients with primary, solitary, and hypervascular HCC ≤5 cm in diameter who were treated with RFA alone between April 2001 and August 2013. Critical recurrence was defined as intra‐ or extrahepatic metastasis, dissemination, or seeding that was difficult to treat radically. Results Of the 279 HCC patients, 157 patients were treated with conventional RFA alone, and 122 patients underwent RFA with prior feeding artery ablation. Although no significant differences were seen in the rates of local tumor progression‐free survival, overall recurrence‐free survival, or overall survival between a conventional RFA group and a prior feeding artery ablation group, significant differences were seen in rates of critical recurrence‐free survival and cancer‐specific survival (5‐year, 69 vs 81%, P = 0.01 and 76 vs 88%, P = 0.03, respectively). On multivariate analysis, prior feeding artery ablation, tumor diameter, and alpha‐fetoprotein were independent factors related to critical recurrence. Conclusions Feeding artery ablation before tumor ablation may reduce the risk of critical recurrence., To reduce the risk of critical recurrence such as metastasis, dissemination, and/or seeding, we conducted selective ablation of the feeding artery before tumor ablation. Our retrospective analysis of 279 patients with primary, solitary, hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma ≤5 cm in diameter who were treated with radiofrequency ablation alone revealed that feeding artery ablation before tumor ablation could reduce the risk of critical recurrence.

Background and aim In September 2015, sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were approved for clinical use in Japan for patients infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus. We conducted a postmarketing prospective cohort study to elucidate the safety and efficacy of this therapy in a real-world setting. Methods We treated 509 patients using standard doses of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for 12 weeks. As sustained virological response (SVR) in 2 patients could not be evaluated, 507 patients were finally analyzed. Patients with daclatasvir plus asunaprevir failure were excluded. Results Four patients (0.8%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. SVR rates for the overall cohort, patients Conclusions In this real-world setting, sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were a safe treatment even in patients ≥75 years old. When patients without pre-existing NS5A RASs and daclatasvir plus asunaprevir failure are selected, extremely high SVR rates can be achieved irrespective of age.