Search

Sulfonamide drugs are extracted from feed and feed premixes by shaking with 0.15N HCl in 25% methanol. The extract is diluted, clarified, and chromatographed on a reverse phase C18 column. Mobile phases used are methanol-2% acetic acid (35 + 65) and acetonitrile-2% acetic acid (18 + 82) for sulfamethazine (SMT) and sulfathiazole (STZ), respectively. A solution of dimethylaminobenzaldehyde (DMAB) is added to the column eluate and the resulting sulfonamide-DMAB complex is detected at 450 nm. The method was tested for linearity, recovery, and precision across a broad sample range. Recovery was 100.6 +/- 2.3% and 96.3 +/- 1.6% for STZ and SMT, respectively. Linearity was excellent (r2 = 0.9985 for STZ and r2 = 0.9996 for SMT) as was within-day precision (RSD = 2.00% for STZ and 1.52% for SMT). The method was compared with the Bratton-Marshall colorimetric method. Analysis of 14 STZ and 15 SMT samples failed to detect any bias between the 2 methods. Some practical aspects of the use of this technique are discussed.

Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) is extracted in acetonitrile on a Goldfisch apparatus, diluted to volume, and determined by reverse phase liquid chromatography (LC). The sum of the peak heights of pre-vitamin D3 and cis-vitamin D3 is used for quantitation. The method was tested for precision, linearity, and recovery. Quadruplicate analyses of 5 formulation samples gave relative standard deviations of 1.56-2.65%. Linearity was excellent with regression and correlation coefficients of 0.9997 and 0.9998, respectively. Recovery was 98.0 +/- 2.7%. The method is applicable to 0.075% cholecalciferol rodent baits.

Furazolidone is separated from finished feeds by acetone-water extraction on a Goldfisch apparatus. Extracting solvent is removed, and the residue is dissolved in dimethylformamide-5% tetraethylammonium bromide (1 +1), clarified, and chromatographed on a reverse phase C1 column. The mobile phase is CH3CN-2% acetic acid (20 + 80) with detection at 365 nm. The method was tested for linearity, recovery, and ruggedness, and compared with the AOAC colorimetric assay by using field samples containing 0.0055-0.055% furazolidone. Precision data suggest a cumulative relative standard deviation of 1.43% within days and 1.78% between days. The ruggedness test predicts a between-laboratory relative standard deviation of 3.67%. Recovery was 97.5 +/- 2.0% and linearity was excellent (r2 = 0.9994) up to 0.06% furazolidone. Premixes are extracted by shaking with dimethylformamide. An aliquot of the extract is diluted (1 + 1) with 5% tetraethylammonium bromide, clarified, and chromatographed.

Twenty g sample, to which sulfamerazine has been added as internal standard, is extracted with 0.3N HCl + 1.5% diethylamine in 25% methanol. The sample extract is chilled (to aid clarification), centrifuged, and filtered. The sulfonamides are separated from each other and from co-extracted materials on a C-18 reverse-phase column and detected at 450 nm following post-column derivatization with dimethylaminobenzaldehyde. Two isocratic mobile phases have been tested: (1) acetonitrile-2% acetic acid (17 + 83), with an analysis time of 13 min; and (2) acetonitrile-methanol-2% acetic acid (4 + 16 + 80), with an analysis time of 20 min but an improved analysis for some samples. As many as 40 samples have been analyzed at one time unattended with the aid of an autosampler. A total of about 1500 field samples have been assayed using the method. Method sensitivity is 0.1 ppm for either analyte in a hog finishing fed. Linearity for each of the analytes is satisfactory over a range of 0.4-25 ppm in spiked feeds. Coefficients of variation range from 13% at 0.5 ppm to 2% at 13 ppm as tested over a period of time in naturally contaminated samples. The absolute recovery of sulfamerazine varies with sample matrix, but, in the presence of sulfamerazine as internal standard, recovery has been 96.7-99.7% over the range of 0.1-10 ppm. Sulfamerazine and sulfamoxole were tested for their suitability as internal standards. Sulfamerazine is a good internal standard for sulfamethazine; neither is ideal for sulfathiazole.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)