Search

The leaf photosynthesis models developed by Farquhar et al. (1980, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386231) (FvCB) and Goudriaan et al. (1985, https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐1‐4899‐3665‐3%5f10) (G85) are both used in Earth system and weather models to quantify ecosystem carbon assimilation. Despite their common role, a systematic comparison between these two photosynthesis models is currently lacking in scientific literature. In this technical report we compared the two models in a systematic way. Hereto we performed a comparative analysis of the model structures as well as the modeled responses of photosynthesis to light and CO2 at leaf level. To facilitate future model comparison, we also constructed a lookup table that presents FvCB model parameters fitted to CO2‐response curves from G85 in a wide natural range in photosynthetic capacity at standardized temperature. The structure of the FvCB model differs fundamentally from the G85 model as the FvCB model considers rate‐limiting processes due to Rubisco capacity, electron transport and triose phosphate utilization in parallel, whereas the G85 model considers Rubisco activity and triose phosphate utilization limitation to act in series scaled with quantum use efficiency. The models also differ fundamentally in terms of the parametrization of dark respiration. Still, both models calculate near‐similar responses of photosynthesis to changes in light and CO2 across a wide range in photosynthetic capacity with only two free parameters each. Our work thereby highlights functional similarities between these model approaches despite fundamental differences in model structure. Hence, standardized parameter sets that yield similar photosynthesis responses to light and CO2 may facilitate intercomparison of Earth system and weather models. Plain Language Summary: In Earth system and weather models the exchange of CO2 between the vegetation and the atmosphere is primarily determined by photosynthesis at leaf level. Two commonly applied representations of leaf photosynthesis are based on the models of Farquhar et al. (1980, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386231) (FvCB) and Goudriaan et al. (1985, https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐1‐4899‐3665‐3%5f10) (G85). A systematic comparison between the two model approaches is currently lacking in scientific literature. The objective of our technical report is to provide such a comparison and thereby to contribute to an exchange of ideas, data and applications between users of the respective models. We found that the two models calculate a similar response of net photosynthesis to light and CO2, despite having considerable differences in their model structure and representation of physiological processes. The main difference in model structure is that the limitations to photosynthesis in the FvCB model are applied in parallel, whereas in the G85 model they are in series. We also present a lookup table to express parameters from the G85 model in terms of their equivalent FvCB parameters. This technical report thereby contributes to the comparison of models used across the Earth system and weather modeling communities. Key Points: We compare two leaf photosynthesis models, based on different biophysical assumptions, that are both used in Earth system and weather modelingThe two models calculate a near‐similar response of net photosynthesis to light and CO2 despite having considerable differences in their structure and process representation. This finding is significant across a wide range of naturally occurring photosynthetic capacities in vegetationThrough a flowchart, a comparison of photosynthetic response to light and CO2 and a parameter conversion table, we aim to enable more communication and exchange of data between users of the two models within the Earth system and weather modeling communities [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Numerical simulations of the tropical mesoscales often exhibit a self-reinforcing feedback between cumulus convection and shallow circulations, which leads to the self-aggregation of clouds into large clusters. We investigate whether this basic feedback can be adequately captured by large-eddy simulations (LESs). To do so, we simulate the non-precipitating, cumulus-topped boundary layer of the canonical "BOMEX" case over a range of numerical settings in two models. Since the energetic convective scales underpinning the self-aggregation are only slightly larger than typical LES grid spacings, aggregation timescales do not converge even at rather high resolutions (<100 m). Therefore, high resolutions or improved sub-filter scale models may be required to faithfully represent certain forms of trade-wind mesoscale cloud patterns and self-aggregating deep convection in large-eddy and cloud-resolving models, and to understand their significance relative to other processes that organize the tropical mesoscales., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union.)