3 results on '"Mosesova, S."'
Search Results
2. Dose-ranging study of lebrikizumab in asthmatic patients not receiving inhaled steroids.
- Author
-
Noonan M, Korenblat P, Mosesova S, Scheerens H, Arron JR, Zheng Y, Putnam WS, Parsey MV, Bohen SP, and Matthews JG
- Subjects
- Adult, Anti-Asthmatic Agents blood, Anti-Asthmatic Agents pharmacokinetics, Antibodies, Monoclonal blood, Antibodies, Monoclonal pharmacokinetics, Asthma immunology, Asthma physiopathology, Chemokine CCL17 blood, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Eosinophils cytology, Eosinophils immunology, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Immunoglobulin E blood, Leukocyte Count, Male, Monocyte Chemoattractant Proteins blood, Anti-Asthmatic Agents administration & dosage, Antibodies, Monoclonal administration & dosage, Asthma drug therapy, Interleukin-13 antagonists & inhibitors
- Abstract
Background: Asthma is a disease with marked heterogeneity in its clinical course and response to treatment. IL-13 is central to type 2 inflammation, which contributes to many key features of asthma. Lebrikizumab is an anti-IL-13 mAb previously reported to significantly improve lung function in patients with inadequately controlled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroid therapy, especially in periostin-high patients., Objective: This phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of IL-13 blockade with different doses of lebrikizumab in asthmatic patients not receiving inhaled corticosteroids., Methods: Patients were randomized to receive 125, 250, or 500 mg of lebrikizumab or placebo subcutaneously monthly for 12 weeks with an 8-week follow-up period. The primary efficacy end point was the relative change in prebronchodilator FEV1 from baseline to week 12., Results: A total of 212 patients were randomized. The mean relative change in FEV1 was numerically higher in all lebrikizumab dose groups versus the placebo group, although the difference was neither statistically nor clinically significant. There were no meaningful differences in changes in FEV1 between the dose groups and the placebo group by the periostin subgroup. Lebrikizumab treatment was associated with a reduced risk of treatment failure at all doses versus placebo (P < .001), and results were similar by the periostin subgroup, with no apparent differences between doses of lebrikizumab. Lebrikizumab was generally well tolerated., Conclusion: Blocking IL-13, a single cytokine, in this population of asthmatic patients is insufficient to improve lung function. There is evidence that IL-13 blockade may improve disease control, as measured by prevention of protocol-defined treatment failure in these patients., (Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Periostin is a systemic biomarker of eosinophilic airway inflammation in asthmatic patients.
- Author
-
Jia G, Erickson RW, Choy DF, Mosesova S, Wu LC, Solberg OD, Shikotra A, Carter R, Audusseau S, Hamid Q, Bradding P, Fahy JV, Woodruff PG, Harris JM, and Arron JR
- Subjects
- Adipokines blood, Adult, Asthma drug therapy, Biomarkers, Breath Tests, Chitinase-3-Like Protein 1, Eosinophilia blood, Eosinophils physiology, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin E blood, Inflammation blood, Interleukin-13 analysis, Interleukin-13 physiology, Lectins blood, Logistic Models, Male, Middle Aged, Nitric Oxide analysis, Asthma blood, Cell Adhesion Molecules blood, Eosinophilia diagnosis, Inflammation diagnosis
- Abstract
Background: Eosinophilic airway inflammation is heterogeneous in asthmatic patients. We recently described a distinct subtype of asthma defined by the expression of genes inducible by T(H)2 cytokines in bronchial epithelium. This gene signature, which includes periostin, is present in approximately half of asthmatic patients and correlates with eosinophilic airway inflammation. However, identification of this subtype depends on invasive airway sampling, and hence noninvasive biomarkers of this phenotype are desirable., Objective: We sought to identify systemic biomarkers of eosinophilic airway inflammation in asthmatic patients., Methods: We measured fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (Feno), peripheral blood eosinophil, periostin, YKL-40, and IgE levels and compared these biomarkers with airway eosinophilia in asthmatic patients., Results: We collected sputum, performed bronchoscopy, and matched peripheral blood samples from 67 asthmatic patients who remained symptomatic despite maximal inhaled corticosteroid treatment (mean FEV(1), 60% of predicted value; mean Asthma Control Questionnaire [ACQ] score, 2.7). Serum periostin levels are significantly increased in asthmatic patients with evidence of eosinophilic airway inflammation relative to those with minimal eosinophilic airway inflammation. A logistic regression model, including sex, age, body mass index, IgE levels, blood eosinophil numbers, Feno levels, and serum periostin levels, in 59 patients with severe asthma showed that, of these indices, the serum periostin level was the single best predictor of airway eosinophilia (P = .007)., Conclusion: Periostin is a systemic biomarker of airway eosinophilia in asthmatic patients and has potential utility in patient selection for emerging asthma therapeutics targeting T(H)2 inflammation., (Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.