1. Magnetoelastic transition and magnetocaloric effect in induction melted Fe100−xRhx bulk alloys with x = 50, 51
- Author
-
B.B. Kovalev, V. N. Prudnikov, Vitalij K. Pecharsky, M. I. Blinov, J.L. Sánchez Llamazares, A.M. Tishin, Vladimir I. Zverev, C.F. Sánchez-Valdés, D. Ríos-Jara, and M. L. Arreguín-Hernández
- Subjects
Phase transition ,Materials science ,Condensed matter physics ,Mechanical Engineering ,Alloy ,Metals and Alloys ,Induction furnace ,02 engineering and technology ,engineering.material ,010402 general chemistry ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,01 natural sciences ,Isothermal process ,0104 chemical sciences ,Magnetization ,Differential scanning calorimetry ,Mechanics of Materials ,Impurity ,Materials Chemistry ,Magnetic refrigeration ,engineering ,0210 nano-technology - Abstract
Magnetoelastic transitions (METs) in bulk in nearly equiatomic Fe-Rh alloys produced by arc melting may show poor reproducibility related to insufficient chemical homogeneity and presence of impurity phases in variable concentrations. To better understand the synthesis conditions that reliably yield bulk FeRh materials with reproducible MET characteristics, Fe100-xRhx alloys with x = 50, 50.5 and 51 at. % were prepared by induction melting and thermal annealing under identical conditions. The fabricated samples were cut into several slices, followed by characterization of METs in each of the slices using isothermal and isofield magnetization measurements, differential scanning calorimetry, and direct measurements of the magnetocaloric effect. All of the slices exhibit METs between the AFM and FM states, but the transitions are abrupt with nearly the same change of magnetization, ΔM, when x = 50.5 and 51, whereas for the x = 50 alloy the transition spreads over a wide temperature interval and ΔM may fluctuate by as much as 10 % from one specimen to another. A comparison of the magnetocaloric responses of x = 50 and 51 materials is presented. The clearly different effect of the magnetic field on the transition in both directions leads to significant differences in the reversibility and maximum values of the magnetic field-induced entropy and adiabatic temperature changes, as well as average hysteresis losses. In terms of reproducibility, our results suggest that induction melting is a more appropriate technique to prepare these binary alloys.
- Published
- 2021