Search

Background: Access to specialists facilitates appropriate Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia (ADRD) medication use and adherence. However, there is little information on the impact of specialists’ availability on ADRD medication adherence, especially in regions of the United States (US) where specialists are scarce, e.g., the Deep South (DS). Objective: To ascertain whether the availability of specialty physicians in the DS and other US regions predicts ADRD medication adherence among community-dwelling older adults Methods: We conducted secondary analyses of claims data for 54,194 Medicare beneficiaries with ADRD in 2013–2015. Medication adherence was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC). Multivariable-adjusted Modified Poisson regression was used to examine associations of adherence with physicians’ availability by region. Results: The race/ethnicity distribution was 81.44% white, 9.17% black, 6.24% Hispanic, 2.25% Asian, and 1% other; 71.81% were female, and 42.36% were older than 85 years. Beneficiaries across regions differed in all individual and contextual characteristics except sex and comorbidities. Neurologists and psychiatrists’ availability was not significantly associated with adherence (DS = 1.00, 0.97–1.03 & non-DS = 1.01, 1.00–1.01). Race and having ≥1 specialist visits were associated with a lower risk of adherence in both regions (p < 0.0001). Advanced age, dual Medicare/Medicaid eligibility, and living in non-large metropolitan areas, were associated with adherence in the non-DS region. Conclusion: Among older Americans with ADRD, a context defined by specialist availability does not affect adherence, but other context characteristics related to socioeconomic status may. Research should further examine the influence of individual and contextual factors on ADRD treatment among older adults.

Background: Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI), a frequent effect of cancer and its treatments, shares common cognitive symptoms with dementia syndromes. Cross-sectional studies demonstrate an inverse relationship between cancer and dementia. However, the longitudinal relationship between dementia decline and cancer has not been investigated. Objective: To evaluate the association between cancer and longitudinal progression of dementia. Methods: We extracted electronic health record data from July 2003 to February 2020 from a single academic medical center. We identified dementia and cancer history prior to dementia using ICD-9/10 codes. We measured cognitive decline with the Alabama Brief Cognitive Screener (ABCs). We used adjusted linear mixed models to estimate baseline cognition and rate of progression by cancer history, including differences by race. Results: The study included 3,809 participants with dementia, of which 672 (17.6%) had cancer history. Those with cancer history had higher baseline cognition (β: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.45, 1.69), but similar rate of decline. Non-Hispanic Blacks had lower cognitive scores at baseline and throughout follow-up regardless of cancer status compared to non-Hispanic Whites and other races/ethnicities with and without cancer history. Conclusion: In this longitudinal retrospective study, participants with cancer history demonstrate better cognition at dementia diagnosis and no difference in cognitive decline than those without cancer history. Smoking and comorbidities attenuate this association and results indicate non-Hispanic Blacks have worse cognitive outcomes in dementia regardless of cancer history than other race/ethnicity groups. Further exploration of the role of smoking, comorbidities, and race/ethnicity on cancer and dementia-related cognitive decline is needed.

Background: African Americans are at increased risk for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) but barriers to optimal clinical care are unclear. Objective: To comprehensively evaluate potential racial differences in the diagnosis and treatment of AD in an academic medical center. Methods: We used the clinical informatics tool, i2b2, to analyze all patient encounters for AD or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in the University of Alabama at Birmingham Health System over a three-year period, examining neuroimaging rates and dementia-related medication use by race and clinic site using ratio tests on contingency tables of stratified patient counts. Results: Enterprise-wide, African Americans were not underrepresented among outpatients seen for AD/MCI. However, there were differences in the clinic setting where visits occurred, with African Americans overrepresented in Geriatrics and primary care clinics and underrepresented in Memory Disorders specialty clinics. There were no racial differences in the rates at which any clinic ordered PET neuroimaging tests or dementia-related medications. However, unsurprisingly, specialty clinics ordered both PET neuroimaging and dementia-related medications at a higher rate than primary care clinics, and overall across the medical enterprise, African Americans were statistically less likely to have PET neuroimaging or dementia-related medications ordered. Conclusion: African Americans with AD/MCI were not underrepresented at this academic medical center but were somewhat less likely to have PET neuroimaging or to be on dementia-related medications, potentially in part from underrepresentation in the specialty clinics where these orders are more likely. The reasons for this underrepresentation in specialty clinics are likely multifactorial and important to better understand.

Background Cross-sectional studies suggest self-reported cancer history is associated with decreased risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, little is known about how self-reported cancer affects longitudinal AD progression, the primary outcome in clinical trials and observational studies. Objective To determine self-reported cancer history's effect on longitudinal AD progression in an observational study. Methods We utilized data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) to evaluate progression to AD by self-reported all-cancer, breast, prostate, colorectal, or non-melanoma skin cancer history. Linear mixed effects models were used to examine baseline differences and rates of progression on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) by self-reported cancer history. Age at AD onset was examined using consensus clinical diagnoses with Cox proportional hazards regression. Results Among 1,271 participants, models revealed no significant differences in progression over time but did reveal significantly lower baseline ADAS-Cog score, indicating better cognition at a given age in those with self-reported cancer history. Cox models indicated those with self-reported cancer history had significantly later age of AD onset (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.53-0.85) after adjustment for covariates. Conclusion Participants with self-reported cancer history entered ADNI with better cognition and later age of AD onset, but progressed similarly to participants without such history, indicating differences in AD between those with and without self-reported cancer history emerge early in the disease course. Such differences in longitudinal progression by self-reported cancer history could affect AD trials and observational studies, given the current focus on early disease course. Further investigation is warranted with detailed longitudinal assessment of cancer and AD.