Search

Although not used clinically in North America, etizolam has been identified in forensic samples as an illicit 'designer' benzodiazepine. As a central nervous system depressant, analysis for etizolam has probative value in both death investigations and forensic cases where incapacitation or human psychomotor performance is relevant. This report examines toxicological findings and demographic data in a series of authentic forensic cases analyzed between November 2019 and December 2020 in which etizolam was quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. Blood concentrations were determined in 191 individuals aged 1-75 years. In living individuals (i.e., impaired driving and sexual assaults), etizolam concentrations ranged from <5 to 767 ng/mL which overlapped with the range of <5 to 260 ng/mL reported in death investigations. In all but one case, other drugs were detected in combination with etizolam. Fentanyl was the most common co-occurring drug and was present in 164 cases (86%). Additional case details are provided for cases of forensic interest: two deaths involving children <3 years of age, two deaths involving body packing and an individual arrested for drug-impaired driving with, to our knowledge, the highest reported etizolam concentration to date., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Etizolam is a novel psychoactive substance and novel benzodiazepine of the thienotriazolodiazepine class, which has recently seen an increasing trend in use worldwide. We report a case series of 10 decedents with etizolam and opioids in their systems. Death investigation, expanded toxicology and medical investigation information were included for contextualization of etizolam in death. Etizolam was detected and confirmed within peripheral and cardiac blood, urine, vitreous humor and, in one case, gastric fluid, by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry methodologies. Death investigation indicated nonmedical use of most drugs. Medical investigation commonly noted pulmonary edema, cardiomegaly and cerebral swelling. The majority of the decedents appeared to be unaware of the presence of etizolam and succumbed to the mixed drug toxicity of their routine depressant and narcotic analgesic drug of abuse in combination with etizolam. Etizolam use continues to be observed and poses as a potentially lethal contribution to multiple drug toxicity, especially in the age of the opioid crisis. Assessment of analytes like etizolam requires up-to-date methodologies and vigilance in testing to better characterize the toxicology and interpret the contribution to death., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

This study describes 12 cases of drivers stopped for impaired driving, where a designer benzodiazepine was detected, specifically etizolam or flubromazolam. Etizolam was detected in three cases, with blood concentrations ranging from 40 to 330 ng/mL. Two of these cases had low concentrations of methamphetamine and/or amphetamine, and in the third case tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) was detected. Flubromazolam was detected in nine cases; in all cases, at least one other drug was detected, with THC being the most prevalent. The mean blood concentration of flubromazolam was 16.3 ng/mL and had a median concentration of 17.0 ng/mL, ranging from 7.0 to 31 ng/mL. The low concentrations of designer benzodiazepines that produce pharmacological effects may allow many of these drugs to go undetected using routine testing in laboratories; therefore, it is necessary to include these novel compounds within validated analytical methods to reduce the chance of reporting false negative results. The prevalence in which laboratories are detecting the presence of novel benzodiazepines in impaired drivers illustrates the increased threat to public safety. These case studies demonstrate the importance of investigating agencies and forensic laboratories to be vigilant in monitoring the emerging novel psychoactive substances in their region., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The use of designer benzodiazepines appears to be increasing in many countries, but data concerning blood concentrations are scarce, making interpretation of concentrations difficult. The aim of this study was to report blood concentrations of clonazolam, diclazepam, etizolam, flualprazolam, flubromazepam, flubromazolam and phenazepam and to investigate the relationship between blood concentrations and impairment. The concentration data are from blood samples collected from living cases (apprehended drivers and other drug offences) and medico-legal autopsies. The blood samples were analysed for the seven designer benzodiazepines mentioned above by ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Positive cases from between 1 June 2016 and 30 September 2019 were included. Blood concentrations and the conclusion from a clinical test of impairment (when available) are reported. The presented seven benzodiazepines were detected in a total of 575 cases, where 554 of these cases concerned apprehended drivers or other criminal offenders. The number of findings and the median (range) concentrations were as follows: clonazolam, n = 22, 0.0041 mg/L (0.0017-0.053 mg/L); diclazepam, n = 334, 0.0096 mg/L (0.0016-0.25 mg/L); etizolam, n = 40, 0.054 mg/L (0.015-0.30 mg/L); flualprazolam, n = 10, 0.0080 mg/L (0.0033-0.056 mg/L); flubromazepam, n = 5, 0.037 mg/L (0.0070-0.70 mg/L); flubromazolam, n = 20, 0.0056 mg/L (0.0004-0.036 mg/L); and phenazepam, n = 138, 0.022 mg/L (0.0018-0.85 mg/L). A designer benzodiazepine was the only drug detected with relevance for impairment in 25 of the 554 living cases. The physician concluded with impairment in 19 of the 25 cases. Most of the concentrations in these cases were relatively similar to or higher than the median reported concentrations. The most frequent other drugs detected were amphetamine, tetrahydrocannabinol, clonazepam and methamphetamine. The presented blood concentrations can be helpful with the interpretation of cases involving one or more of these seven benzodiazepines. The results indicate that concentrations commonly observed in forensic cases are associated with impairment., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Association of Forensic Toxicologists, Inc.)

An analytical method for the detection of 40 benzodiazepines, (±)-zopiclone, zaleplon and zolpidem in blood and urine by solid-phase extraction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was developed and validated. Twenty-nine of 43 analytes were quantified in 0.5 mL whole blood for investigating postmortem, drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) and driving under the influence of drugs cases (DUID). The four different dynamic ranges of the seven-point, linear, 1/x weighted calibration curves with lower limits of quantification of 2, 5, 10 and 20 μg/L across the analytes encompassed the majority of our casework encountered in postmortem, DFSA and DUID samples. Reference materials were available for all analytes except α-hydroxyflualprazolam, a hydroxylated metabolite of flualprazolam. The fragmentation of α-hydroxyflualprazolam was predicted from the fragmentation pattern of α-hydroxyalprazolam, and the appropriate transitions were added to the method to enable monitoring for this analyte. Urine samples were hydrolyzed at 55°C for 30 min with a genetically modified β-glucuronidase enzyme, which resulted in >95% efficiency measured by oxazepam glucuronide. Extensive sample preparation included combining osmotic lysing and protein precipitation with methanol/acetonitrile mixture followed by freezing and centrifugation resulted in exceptionally high signal-to-noise ratios. Bias and between-and within-day imprecision for quality controls (QCs) were all within ±15%, except for clonazolam and etizolam that were within ±20%. All 29 of the 43 analytes tested for QC performance met quantitative reporting criteria within the dynamic ranges of the calibration curves, and 14 analytes, present only in the calibrator solution, were qualitatively reported. Twenty-five analytes met all quantitative reporting criteria including dilution integrity. The ability to analyze quantitative blood and qualitative urine samples in the same batch is one of the most useful elements of this procedure. This sensitive, specific and robust analytical method was routinely employed in the analysis of >300 samples in our laboratory over the last 6 months., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The misuse of designer benzodiazepines, as an alternative to prescription benzodiazepines and for drug-facilitated sexual assaults, has emerged as a growing threat, due in part to the ease of purchasing these drugs on the internet at low prices. Causing concern for safety is the lack of dosage information resulting in users self-medicating, often leading to unintended overdoses, coma or death at higher doses. With limited published data regarding the quantification of designer benzodiazepines in forensic cases, a method was validated for the determination of 13 designer benzodiazepines in postmortem blood, to add to the in-house method that already included a limited number of common designer benzodiazepines. The developed method included 3-hydroxyphenazepam, clobazam, clonazolam, delorazepam, deschloroetizolam, diclazepam, flualprazolam, flubromazepam, flubromazolam, flunitrazolam, meclonazepam, nifoxipam and pyrazolam in 0.5 mL postmortem blood using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The analytes were treated with solid phase extraction before undergoing separation on a C18 column and analyzed on the mass spectrometer in electrospray positive mode using multiple reaction monitoring. The linear range of the calibration curve was 1-200 ng/mL and up to 500 ng/mL for 3-hydroxyphenazepam, clobazam, flubromazepam and pyrazolam. The limits of detection and quantitation were 0.5 ng/mL (signal-to-noise ratio >3) and 1 ng/mL, respectively. The calculated bias, intra-day imprecision, relative standard deviation (RSD) and inter-day imprecision RSD were ±12%, 3-20% and 4-21%. Matrix effects ranged from -52% to 33% with RSD values ranging from 3-20%, indicating consistent effects throughout multiple sources. Recovery ranged from 35 to 90%, where only two compounds were <50%. Other parameters tested included carryover, stability, interference and dilution integrity, which all yielded acceptable results. With the application of this method to blood specimens from the New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner, this validated method proved to be simple, reproducible, sensitive and robust., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are widely used for treatment of anxiety and insomnia, however, this class of drugs is also commonly abused. Many different BZDs and analogs have been produced that are not FDA-approved. We tested 15 of these with the ThermoFisher CEDIA® BZD-immunoassay. With the exception of ketazolam, all compounds showed significant reactivity, highlighting the need for mass spectrometry confirmation assays. We developed a liquid-chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry method for the detection of these 15 non-FDA approved BZDs. The limit of detection for most compounds ranged from 1 to 50 ng/mL, with mostly positive matrix effects observed in urine and negative matrix effects in serum. In a clinical research case, clonazolam and etizolam were detected in serum at 10.2 and 281 ng/mL, with an apparent elimination half-life of 3.6 and 4.8 hours, respectively. Although we did not detect non-FDA approved BZDs in 211 urine samples that were previously determined to be BZD-positive by immunoassay, abuse of these drugs is on the rise and clinical and forensic toxicology laboratories should consider developing methods to detect them., (© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The number of new psychoactive substances (NPS) available is constantly increasing, making it difficult for toxicology laboratories to keep screening methods up to date. Full scan high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) is a versatile technique which allows for progressive updating of spectral databases to increase the scope of screening. It also allows for retrospective screening of data-specifically, reprocessing of data files using an updated spectral database without the need for re-extraction or reanalysis.The coronial case reported here illustrates the application of retrospective processing of HRMS data in the detection of emerging NPS. A 28-year-old male with a history of illicit drug use was found deceased at home. Initial routine screening of the post-mortem peripheral blood identified only methylamphetamine, amphetamine and trace amounts of lorazepam. A compound with an accurate mass and isotope ratio consistent with the opioid AH-7921 was also detected in the liquid chromatography (LC)-HRMS screen; however; the retention time and mass spectrum did not match the library. Further investigation confirmed the compound to be U-47700, another opioid and structural isomer of AH-7921. Several months later, after additional NPS had been added to the in-house HRMS database, retrospective screening of the HRMS data was performed, revealing the presence of designer benzodiazepines, diclazepam and flubromazepam as well as the psychedelic drug 2,5-dimethoxy-4-chloroamphetamine (DOC). Quantitative analysis gave the following results in peripheral post-mortem blood: U-47700 (330 μg/L), diclazepam (70 μg/L), flubromazepam (10 μg/L), methylamphetamine (290 μg/L) and amphetamine (150 μg/L) (DOC not quantitated). These substances, along with lorazepam and etizolam, were also confirmed in the post-mortem urine and an investigation into blood and urinary metabolites was carried out. All analyses were performed using the same LC-quadrupole-time of flight method. The cause of death was aspiration (of gastric content into airways and lungs) due to mixed drug toxicity.

MT-45 (1-cyclohexyl-4-(1,2-diphenylethyl)piperazine) is just one of the many novel psychoactive substances (NPS) to have reached the recreational drug market in the twenty-first century; it is however, one of the first designer opioids to achieve some degree of popularity, in a market currently dominated by synthetic cannabinoids and designer stimulants. A single fatality involving MT-45 and etizolam is described. A method for the quantitation of MT-45 in whole blood using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was developed and validated. The linear range was determined to be 1.0-100 ng/mL with a detection limit of 1.0 ng/mL, and the method met the requirements for acceptable linearity, precision and accuracy. After analyzing the sample on dilution and by standard addition, the concentration of MT-45 in the decedent's blood was determined to be 520 ng/mL, consistent with other concentrations of MT-45 reported in drug-related fatalities. Etizolam was present at a concentration of 35 ng/mL. This case illustrates the importance of considering non-traditional drugs in unexplained apparent drug-related deaths., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Phenazepam and etizolam were the first uncontrolled benzodiazepines available for sale in the UK. Pyrazolam, flubromazepam and diclazepam are not used medicinally anywhere in the world; they are produced exclusively for the uncontrolled, recreational market. It is important to know whether potentially abused drugs like these can be detected in routine toxicological screening tests. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the Immunalysis® Benzodiazepines ELISA kit could detect phenazepam, etizolam, pyrazolam, flubromazepam, diclazepam and its metabolite delorazepam. Their cross-reactivity was assessed by comparing the absorbance of the drug with that of oxazepam, the reference standard. This study found that these uncontrolled benzodiazepines cross-react sufficiently to produce a positive result with the Immunalysis® Benzodiazepine ELISA kit. Cross-reactivity ranged from 79 to 107% for phenazepam, etizolam, pyrazolam, flubromazepam, diclazepam and delorazepam fortified into blood. The results show that it is possible to detect these newer benzodiazepines with traditional forensic toxicology laboratory tools and it is important to include these benzodiazepines in the confirmation tests., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

A procedure is presented for the concomitant identification and quantitation of certain commonly abused weak acid and natural drugs from whole blood. This procedure offers several advantages over other procedures in that: (A) a means of extraction of the drugs from blood using a very inexpensive source of diatomaceous earth (Celite 560) is presented, (B) the addition of three internal standards allows the quantitation of several drugs from blood with just one extraction of the blood sample, (C) the extracts are virtually free of any contaminants from biological sources or from biologically inert drug metabolites, and (D) the barbiturates and desmethyldiazepam are derivatized to enhance their limits of detection and reduce peak tailing frequently observed when using the nitrogen-phosphorous detector and gas chromatography (NPD/GC). Some 1000 positive driving-under-the-influence cases have been quantitated by this method.

Chloroquine, monodesethylchloroquine, diazepam, and nordiazepam levels are simultaneously determined in whole blood or plasma by HPLC. Papaverine is used as internal standard, and the analysis is performed after protein-binding hydrolysis, absorption on Extrelut, and elution with diethyl ether/methylene chloride (70:30 v/v). UV detection is used at 343 nm for 12 min, then changed to 242 nm. There are two mobile phases with two flow rates. The procedure requires 30 min, is reproducible, sensitive (8-10 ng/mL for chloroquine and its metabolite, 4 ng/mL for diazepam and nordiazepam), and selective, especially towards other antimalarial agents and drugs like adrenaline or barbiturates, which may be used in chloroquine poisoning therapy. It can be used for pharmacokinetic studies, therapeutic control, to establish the diagnosis and prognosis of a chloroquine poisoning, and to follow and optimize treatment.