Search

A 2–yr production study was conducted to evaluate 3 systems of growing stocker calves under rotational stocking. One group of steers was stocked on pasture from early April to mid August (springstocked steers = SSS), and another group of steers was stocked from early July to late October (fall–stocked steers = FSS). Steers were stratified by BW (n = 72, BW=229±llkgforSSS;n=72,BW=248±18 kg for FSS) and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments. The 3 treatments were 1) rotationally stocked only (control; CON), steers rotated to a new paddock as forage availability dropped below acceptable levels in the occupied paddock; 2) rotationally stocked with distillers grains (DIST); this was the same as CON except steers were supplemented with varying amounts of distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) based on forage nutritive value; and 3) rotationally stocked with round–bale silage (SIL); excess forage in spring was harvested and stored as round–bale silage and fed back as needed. Total BW gain/ha over the entire grazing season did not differ between DIST and SIL (P = 0.09) steers, but both were greater thall CON (P < 0.01). Total BW gain/ha for DIST, SIL, and CON was 459 (SEM = 11.5), 402 (SEM = 31.0), and 276 (SEM = 26.2) kg, respectively. For ADG, there was a group x year (P < 0.01) and group x treatment (P = 0.02) interaction. Steer ADG for SSS did not differ between SIL and DIST (P = 0.51), but was greater than the CON (P = 0.01). The ADG for SSS was 0.79 (SEM = 0.04), 0.81 (SEM = 0.05), and 0.62 (SEM = 0.05) kg for DIST, SIL, and CON, respectively. For the FSS, ADG for all 3 treatments was different (P = 0.02). The FSS ADG was 0.72 (SEM 0.03), 0.53 (SEM = 0.04), and 0.29 (SEM = 0.04) kg for DIST, SIL, and CON, respectively. The only treatment with equivalent (P = 0.07) ADG between early and late–stocked steers (SSS vs. FSS) was DIST. Adjusting the amount of DDGS supplemented to steers based on forage nutritive value resulted in consistent BW gains throughout the grazing study, whereas steers in the SIL and CON treatments gained less BW during the latter portion of the season. Controlling forage maturity by removal in the SIL treatment resulted in total BW gains/ha that were not different than the DIST treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 2–yr production study was conducted to evaluate 3 systems of growing stocker calves under rotational stocking. One group of steers was stocked on pasture from early April to mid August (springstocked steers = SSS), and another group of steers was stocked from early July to late October (fall–stocked steers = FSS). Steers were stratified by BW (n = 72, BW=229±llkgforSSS;n=72,BW=248±18 kg for FSS) and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments. The 3 treatments were 1) rotationally stocked only (control; CON), steers rotated to a new paddock as forage availability dropped below acceptable levels in the occupied paddock; 2) rotationally stocked with distillers grains (DIST); this was the same as CON except steers were supplemented with varying amounts of distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) based on forage nutritive value; and 3) rotationally stocked with round–bale silage (SIL); excess forage in spring was harvested and stored as round–bale silage and fed back as needed. Total BW gain/ha over the entire grazing season did not differ between DIST and SIL (P = 0.09) steers, but both were greater thall CON (P < 0.01). Total BW gain/ha for DIST, SIL, and CON was 459 (SEM = 11.5), 402 (SEM = 31.0), and 276 (SEM = 26.2) kg, respectively. For ADG, there was a group x year (P < 0.01) and group x treatment (P = 0.02) interaction. Steer ADG for SSS did not differ between SIL and DIST (P = 0.51), but was greater than the CON (P = 0.01). The ADG for SSS was 0.79 (SEM = 0.04), 0.81 (SEM = 0.05), and 0.62 (SEM = 0.05) kg for DIST, SIL, and CON, respectively. For the FSS, ADG for all 3 treatments was different (P = 0.02). The FSS ADG was 0.72 (SEM 0.03), 0.53 (SEM = 0.04), and 0.29 (SEM = 0.04) kg for DIST, SIL, and CON, respectively. The only treatment with equivalent (P = 0.07) ADG between early and late–stocked steers (SSS vs. FSS) was DIST. Adjusting the amount of DDGS supplemented to steers based on forage nutritive value resulted in consistent BW gains throughout the grazing study, whereas steers in the SIL and CON treatments gained less BW during the latter portion of the season. Controlling forage maturity by removal in the SIL treatment resulted in total BW gains/ha that were not different than the DIST treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb.) is the most predominant forage used in Southeastern United States for cow-calf production. Endophyte-infected tall fescue is easily established, adaptable to different environments and grazing tolerant, however alkaloids produced by the fungus cause metabolic disorders in animals referred to fescue toxicosis. Previous research has demonstrated cows consuming endophyte-infected tall fescue have decreased prolactin concentrations, decreased milk production and reduced growth performance in stacker calves. Animals have been shown to differ in degree of tolerance to endophyte-infected tall fescue. T-Snip is a commercial genetic test developed to identify tolerance of cattle to toxic tall fescue. The objective of this study was to analyze correlation between T-Snip test in cows consuming endophyte-infected tall fescue and 205-d weaning weights of their respective calves. We hypothesized T-Snip test score would be predictive of 205-d weaning weights of calves from cows consuming endophyte-infected tall fescue. Nine herds, with 4 herds tested 2 or more years, consuming endophyte-infected tall fescue were tested for fescue toxicity tolerance using the T-Snip genetic test between yr 2012 and 2015. Cows were scored from 0 to 5 for tolerance to fescue toxicity with zero being intolerant and 5 being most tolerant. Total of 2494 tests were performed and number of animals per herd ranged from 75 to 647. Correlation coefficient between cow tolerance score and 205-d weaning weights were measured for each herd and year data set. Correlation from each data set was significant (P < 0.02). The correlation coefficient averaged 0.63 and ranged from 0.42 to 0.76. Calf weaning weights from cows scored 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 averaged 212, 218, 226, 233, 240, and 246 kg, respectively. In conclusion T-Snip score from cows consuming endophyte-infected tall fescue was correlated to calf 205-d weaning weight and can be used as an indicator of tolerance to fescue toxicity. Difference in calf weaning weight between tolerant and intolerant cows averaged 28 kg. Tolerance to toxic tall fescue as determined by T-Snip analysis accounts for approximately one-half the effect of toxic tall fescue on calf weaning weight. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]