Search

The increasing incidence and changing epidemiology of invasive fungal infections continue to present many challenges to their effective management. The repertoire of antifungal drugs available for treatment is still limited although there are new antifungals on the horizon. Successful treatment of invasive mycoses is dependent on a mix of pathogen-, host- and antifungal drug-related factors. Laboratories need to be adept at detection of fungal pathogens in clinical samples in order to effectively guide treatment by identifying isolates with acquired drug resistance. While there are international guidelines on how to conduct in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing, these are not performed as widely as for bacterial pathogens. Furthermore, fungi generally are recovered in cultures more slowly than bacteria, and often cannot be cultured in the laboratory. Therefore, non-culture-based methods, including molecular tests, to detect fungi in clinical specimens are increasingly important in patient management and are becoming more reliable as technology improves. Molecular methods can also be used for detection of target gene mutations or other mechanisms that predict antifungal drug resistance. This review addresses acquired antifungal drug resistance in the principal human fungal pathogens and describes known resistance mechanisms and what in-house and commercial tools are available for their detection. It is emphasized that this approach should be complementary to culture-based susceptibility testing, given the range of mutations, resistance mechanisms and target genes that may be present in clinical isolates, but may not be included in current molecular assays., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Objectives: Terbinafine resistance is increasingly reported in Trichophyton, rendering susceptibility testing particularly important in non-responding cases. We performed a multicentre evaluation of six EUCAST-based methods., Methods: Ten laboratories susceptibility tested terbinafine, itraconazole, voriconazole and amorolfine against a blinded panel of 38 terbinafine WT and target gene mutant isolates. E.Def 9.3.1 modifications included: medium with/without addition of chloramphenicol and cycloheximide (CC), incubation at 25°C to 28°C for 5-7 days and three MIC endpoints [visually and spectrophotometrically (90%/50% inhibition)], generating 7829 MICs. Quality control (QC) strains were Aspergillus flavus ATCC 204304 and CNM-CM1813. Eyeball, ECOFFinder (where ECOFF stands for epidemiological cut-off) and derivatization WT upper limits (WT-ULs), very major errors (VMEs; mutants with MICs ≤WT-ULs) and major errors (MEs; WT isolates with MICs >WT-ULs) were determined., Results: MICs fell within the QC ranges for ATCC 204304/CNM-CM1813 for 100%/96% (voriconazole) and 84%/84% (itraconazole), respectively. Terbinafine MICs fell within 0.25-1 mg/L for 96%/92%, suggesting high reproducibility. Across the six methods, the number of terbinafine MEs varied from 2 to 4 (2.6%-5.2%) for Trichophyton rubrum and from 0 to 2 (0%-2.0%) for Trichophyton interdigitale. Modes for WT and mutant populations were at least seven 2-fold dilutions apart in all cases. Excluding one I121M/V237I T. rubrum mutant and two mixed WT/mutant T. interdigitale specimens, the numbers of VMEs were as follows: T. rubrum: CC visual, 1/67 (1.5%); CC spectrophotometric 90% inhibition, 3/59 (5.1%); and CC spectrophotometric 50% inhibition, 1/67 (1.5%); and T. interdigitale: none. Voriconazole and amorolfine MICs were quite uniform, but trailing growth complicated determination of itraconazole visual and spectrophotometric 90% inhibition MIC., Conclusions: Although none of the laboratories was experienced in dermatophyte testing, error rates were low. We recommend the CC spectrophotometric 50% inhibition method and provide QC ranges and WT-ULs for WT/non-WT classification., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To evaluate the in vitro interactions of isavuconazole with immune suppressors (tacrolimus, cyclosporin A or sirolimus) against 30 Mucorales isolates belonging to the most common species responsible for mucormycosis in humans (Rhizopus arrhizus, Rhizopus delemar, Rhizopus microsporus, Lichtheimia corymbifera, Lichtheimia ramosa, Mucor circinelloides and Rhizomucor pusillus)., Methods: In vitro interaction was evaluated by a microdilution chequerboard technique., Results: Combination of isavuconazole with tacrolimus, cyclosporin A or sirolimus, was synergistic for 50%, 46% and 7% of the isolates, respectively. Antagonistic interaction was observed for 4% of the isolates for the combination with cyclosporin A (one R. arrhizus isolate) and for 32% of the isolates for the combination with sirolimus (six R. arrhizus isolates and three R. pusillus isolates)., Conclusions: These in vitro data show that calcineurin inhibitors are more likely than inhibitors of the mTOR pathway to enhance the activity of isavuconazole against Mucorales. These in vitro results warrant further animal experiments., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: MDR Candida strains are emerging. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), which enables extensive and deep genome analysis, was used to investigate echinocandin and azole resistance in clinical Candida isolates., Methods: Six genes commonly involved in antifungal resistance (ERG11, ERG3, TAC1, CgPDR1, FKS1 and FKS2) were analysed using NGS in 40 Candida isolates (18 Candida albicans, 15 Candida glabrata and 7 Candida parapsilosis). The strategy was validated using strains with known sequences. Then, 8 clinical strains displaying antifungal resistance and 23 sequential isolates collected from 10 patients receiving antifungal therapy were analysed., Results: A total of 391 SNPs were detected, among which 6 coding SNPs were reported for the first time. Novel genetic alterations were detected in both azole and echinocandin resistance genes. A C. glabrata strain, which was resistant to echinocandins but highly susceptible to azoles, harboured an FKS2 S663P mutation plus a novel presumed loss-of-function CgPDR1 mutation. This isolate was from a patient with deep-seated and urinary candidiasis. Another C. glabrata isolate, with an MDR phenotype, carried a new FKS2 S663A mutation and a new putative gain-of-function CgPDR1 mutation (T370I); this isolate showed mutated (80%) and WT (20%) populations and was collected after 75 days of exposure to caspofungin from a patient who underwent complicated abdominal surgery., Conclusions: This study shows that NGS can be used for extensive assessment of genetic mutations involved in antifungal resistance. This type of wide genome approach will become very valuable for detecting mechanisms of resistance in clinical strains subjected to multidrug pressure., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

In vitro susceptibilities of 36 zygomycete isolates, belonging to six genera, to itraconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole, terbinafine, amphotericin B and 5-fluorocytosine were determined by using a broth microdilution adaptation of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M-38P reference method. The influence of incubation time on MIC values, and the performance of a spectrophotometric method for MIC determination in comparison with the visual reference method, were also evaluated. Amphotericin B was active against most of the isolates. All the isolates were highly resistant to 5-fluorocytosine (MICs > 256 mg/L). Voriconazole was significantly less active than the other drugs with an overall MIC(90) (MIC at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited) of 32 mg/L. In contrast, posaconazole showed good activity (MIC(90) 1 mg/L). A wide range of MICs, from 0.03 to > or =32 mg/L, was obtained for itraconazole and terbinafine. Differences in susceptibility between and within genera were noted. Rhizopus spp. were significantly less susceptible to itraconazole, posaconazole, terbinafine and amphotericin B than Absidia spp., and less susceptible than Mucor spp. to amphotericin B. Terbinafine appeared to be more active against Rhizopus microsporus than against Rhizopus oryzae (geometric mean MIC of 0.15 and 64 mg/L, respectively). The activity of the drugs was dependent on the incubation period. A significant increase in MICs was noted between 24 and 48 h of incubation. On the other hand, the two methods used for MIC determination (visual and spectrophotometric readings) showed good agreement. These results suggest that the zygomycetes are a heterogeneous group for antifungal susceptibility. Some of the conventional and new antifungals are effective in vitro; their efficacies in vivo remain to be determined. The spectrophotometric method appears to be a valuable alternative to the visual method for MIC determination for zygomycetes.

The MICs of amphotericin B and itraconazole for 230 isolates of Aspergillus spp., comprising 156 Aspergillus fumigatus, 20 Aspergillus terreus, 22 Aspergillus flavus, 17 Aspergillus nidulans and 15 Aspergillus niger, were determined by a broth microdilution method with RPMI 1640 medium. No isolate was detected with an MIC of amphotericin B >2 mg/L. Itraconazole MICs >16 mg/L were detected for four Aspergillus fumigatus and one Aspergillus nidulans isolates.