Search

BACKGROUND: Emtricitabine triphosphate (FTC-TP), the phosphorylated anabolite of emtricitabine, can be quantified in dried blood spots (DBS). We evaluated FTC-TP in DBS as a predictor of viral suppression and evaluated self-reported adherence as a predictor of FTC-TP. METHODS: Persons living with HIV (PLWH) on an FTC-containing regimen were prospectively recruited. A DBS and HIV viral load were obtained during routine clinical visits. Self-reported adherence for 3 days, 30 days and 3 months was captured. Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of viral suppression for quantifiable FTC-TP versus below the limit of quantification (BLQ). The utility of self-reported adherence to predict quantifiable FTC-TP was assessed by calculating the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and fifty-four person-visits from 514 participants who had DBS assayed for FTC-TP were included in the analysis. After adjusting for age, gender, race, BMI, ART class, ART duration, estimated glomerular filtration rate and CD4+ T cell count, the aOR (95% CI) for viral suppression for quantifiable FTC-TP versus BLQ was 7.2 (4.3–12.0; P

Background Dolutegravir, an HIV integrase strand-transfer inhibitor, and simeprevir, an HCV NS3/4A PI, have the potential to interact as dolutegravir is a P-glycoprotein, uridine glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 and cytochrome P4503A substrate and simeprevir has been shown to mildly inhibit these. Objectives To compare dolutegravir and simeprevir pharmacokinetics (PK) when given separately versus in combination. Methods Healthy volunteers received: (i) 150 mg of simeprevir once daily for 7 days; (ii) 50 mg of dolutegravir once daily for 7 days; and (iii) 150 mg of simeprevir once daily plus 50 mg of dolutegravir once daily for 7 days, with randomization to treatment sequence. Twenty-four hour intensive PK sampling was performed on day 7 of each sequence following observed dosing and a standardized meal. PK parameters were determined using non-compartmental methods and compared using paired t-tests. Bioequivalence for area under the curve (AUCtau) and maximum concentration (Cmax) were also assessed. NCT02404805. Results Twenty-four subjects completed all three sequences. Dolutegravir trough was increased 24% (P = 0.0003) with simeprevir. Dolutegravir AUCtau was increased 15% (P = 0.002), but was deemed bioequivalent as the 90% CI for the geometric mean ratio was 107%-123%. Dolutegravir Cmax was bioequivalent. Simeprevir PK was unaffected by dolutegravir. There were no discontinuations due to adverse events and all adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. Conclusions Dolutegravir trough was increased slightly with simeprevir, but AUCtau was bioequivalent. Despite the increase in trough, dolutegravir concentrations were well within the range with established safety data. Suggesting that simeprevir and dolutegravir can be safely co-administered.

Objectives This study evaluated the relationship between intracellular tenofovir diphosphate concentrations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and prophylactic efficacy in a macaque model for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Methods Macaques were challenged with simian HIV (SHIV) via rectal inoculation once weekly for up to 14 weeks. A control group (n=34) received no drug, a second group (n=6) received oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine 3 days before each virus challenge and a third group (n=6) received the same dosing plus another dose 2 h after virus challenge. PBMCs were collected just before each weekly virus challenge. The relationship between tenofovir diphosphate in PBMCs and prophylactic efficacy was assessed with a Cox proportional hazards model. Results The percentages of animals infected in the control, one-dose and two-dose groups were 97, 83 and 17, respectively. The mean (SD) steady-state tenofovir diphosphate concentration (fmol/10(6) cells) was 15.8 (7.6) in the one-dose group and 30.7 (10.1) in the two-dose group. Each 5 fmol tenofovir diphosphate/10(6) cells was associated with a 40% (95% CI 17%-56%) reduction in risk of SHIV acquisition, P=0.002. The tenofovir diphosphate concentration associated with a 90% reduction in risk (EC90) was 22.6 fmol/10(6) cells (95% CI 13.8-60.8). Conclusions The prophylactic EC90 for tenofovir diphosphate identified in macaques exposed rectally compares well with the EC90 previously identified in men who have sex with men (MSM; 16 fmol/10(6) cells, 95% CI 3-28). These results highlight the relevance of this model to inform human PrEP studies of oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine for MSM.

Sir, Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) have lower rates of sustained virological response to hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment compared with those without significant hepatic impairment.1 There may be pathophysiological alterations associated with ESLD, which may alter drug penetration or drug activation in the liver.2 Comparing the concentrations of antiviral drugs in liver versus blood may inform drug selection in ESLD. The objective of this work was to quantify antiviral drugs in liver tissue and the active, phosphorylated forms of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) in hepatocytes obtained from a fresh liver explant and to compare these values with drug concentrations in paired plasma and PBMCs. A 50-year-old male with HIV/HCV coinfection on the liver transplant list was transferred to our hospital with acute kidney injury (serum creatinine 4.11 mg/dL) with a Model for ESLD score of 40. In the year prior to hospitalization, the patient's antiretroviral regimen included 300 mg of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate once daily plus 200 mg of emtricitabine once daily, 800 mg of darunavir once daily, 100 mg of ritonavir once daily and 400 mg of raltegravir twice daily. The patient had an HIV-1 RNA of