Search

Ofloxacin, its optical isomers levofloxacin (HR 355, DR-3355) and D-ofloxacin (DR-3354) and ciprofloxacin were administered orally to mice and rats which had systemic and localized infections. Both levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were equally effective in treating systemic murine infections caused by staphylococci, Enterobacteriaceae or Pseudomonas aeruginosa with ED 50 s ranging from 0.18 to 15.8 mg/kg and 0.42 to 16.3 mg/kg respectively and both these agents were twice as effective as ofloxacin which had an ED 50 0.41 to 39.7 mg/kg. In contrast, D-ofloxacin was either inactive or exhibited only modest chemotherapeutic activity against the staphylococci and the Gram-negative organisms tested. When given to mice to treat staphylococcal abscesses and lung infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae DT-S levofloxacin was up to four times more effective and produced a more pronounced bactericidal effect against the pathogens in vivo than the reference compounds. Despite possessing a similar, if not lesser, in-vitro activity against the infecting pathogens, levofloxacin was more effective than ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in rats with localized infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa.

Cefpirome, cefoperazone and ceftazidime were tested for their in-vitro activity against Enterococcus faecalis and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates. Cefpirome was the most active cephalosporin followed by cefoperazone. Ceftazidime had only very limited activity against these strains. In experiments with cefpirome/vancomycin and cefoperazone/vancomycin combinations, synergy was detected against most MRSA strains and some enterococci. Antagonism did not occur.

The in-vitro activity of cefpirome was compared with other antibiotics against organisms causing sexually transmitted diseases (STD). The excellent activity of cefpirome against Neisseria gonorrhoeae (MIC90 1.0 mg/L), Haemophilus ducreyi (MIC90 0.5 mg/L), and Gardnerella vaginalis (MIC90 1.0 mg/L) suggests that this agent might be useful in the empirical treatment of a variety of venereal diseases.

The pharmacokinetic profile of cefpirome was evaluated in rats and dogs after a single intravenous or intramuscular dose. A two-compartment open model was used for the calculation of the pharmacokinetic parameters for both routes of administration. The elimination half-lives after intravenous and intramuscular administration of 20 mg/kg cefpirome did not differ significantly and ranged from 0.4 h in rats to 1.1 h in dogs. Cefpirome was mainly excreted via the kidneys. After iv or im dosing of the compound, between 80% (dogs) and 90% (rats) was recovered in urine within 24 h. The bioavailability of cefpirome in rats and dogs after both routes of administration was almost identical when calculated either by the AUC or the urinary recovery rates.