Search

Background: Genotypic resistance testing (GRT) is routinely performed upon diagnosis of HIV-1 infection or during virological failure using plasma viral RNA. An alternative source for GRT could be cellular HIV-1 DNA., Objectives: A substantial number of participants in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS) never received GRT. We applied a method that enables access to the near full-length proviral HIV-1 genome without requiring detectable viraemia., Methods: Nine hundred and sixty-two PBMC specimens were received. Our two-step nested PCR protocol was applied to generate two overlapping long-range amplicons of the HIV-1 genome, sequenced by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and analysed by MinVar, a pipeline to detect drug resistance mutations (DRMs)., Results: Six hundred and eighty-one (70.8%) of the samples were successfully amplified, sequenced and analysed by MinVar. Only partial information of the pol gene was contained in 82/681 (12%), probably due to naturally occurring deletions in the proviral sequence. All common HIV-1 subtypes were successfully sequenced. We detected at least one major DRM at high frequency (≥15%) in 331/599 (55.3%) individuals. Excluding APOBEC-signature (G-to-A mutation) DRMs, 145/599 (24.2%) individuals carried at least one major DRM. RT-inhibitor DRMs were most prevalent. The experienced time on ART was significantly longer in DRM carriers (P = 0.001) independent of inclusion or exclusion of APOBEC-signature DRMs., Conclusions: We successfully applied a reliable and efficient method to analyse near full-length HIV-1 proviral DNA and investigated DRMs in individuals with undetectable or low viraemia. Additionally, our data underscore the need for new computational tools to exclude APOBEC-related hypermutated NGS sequence reads for reporting DRMs., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is gradually replacing Sanger sequencing (SS) as the primary method for HIV genotypic resistance testing. However, there are limited systematic data on comparability of these methods in a clinical setting for the presence of low-abundance drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and their dependency on the variant-calling thresholds., Methods: To compare the HIV-DRMs detected by SS and NGS, we included participants enrolled in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS) with SS and NGS sequences available with sample collection dates ≤7 days apart. We tested for the presence of HIV-DRMs and compared the agreement between SS and NGS at different variant-calling thresholds., Results: We included 594 pairs of SS and NGS from 527 SHCS participants. Males accounted for 80.5% of the participants, 76.3% were ART naive at sample collection and 78.1% of the sequences were subtype B. Overall, we observed a good agreement (Cohen's kappa >0.80) for HIV-DRMs for variant-calling thresholds ≥5%. We observed an increase in low-abundance HIV-DRMs detected at lower thresholds [28/417 (6.7%) at 10%-25% to 293/812 (36.1%) at 1%-2% threshold]. However, such low-abundance HIV-DRMs were overrepresented in ART-naive participants and were in most cases not detected in previously sampled sequences suggesting high sequencing error for thresholds <3%., Conclusions: We found high concordance between SS and NGS but also a substantial number of low-abundance HIV-DRMs detected only by NGS at lower variant-calling thresholds. Our findings suggest that a substantial fraction of the low-abundance HIV-DRMs detected at thresholds <3% may represent sequencing errors and hence should not be overinterpreted in clinical practice., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)