Search

In aiming for better access to climate change information and for providing climate service, it is important to obtain reliable high-resolution temperature simulations. Systematic comparisons are still deficient between statistical and dynamic downscaling techniques because of their inherent unavoidable uncertainties. In this paper, 20 global climate models (GCMs) and one regional climate model [Providing Regional Climates to Impact Studies (PRECIS)] are employed to evaluate their capabilities in reproducing average trends of mean temperature (Tm), maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin), diurnal temperature range (DTR), and extreme events represented by frost days (FD) and heat-wave days (HD) across China. It is shown generally that bias of temperatures from GCMs relative to observations is over ±1°C across more than one-half of mainland China. PRECIS demonstrates better representation of temperatures (except for HD) relative to GCMs. There is relatively better performance in Huanghuai, Jianghuai, Jianghan, south Yangzi River, and South China, whereas estimation is not as good in Xinjiang, the eastern part of northwest China, and the Tibetan Plateau. Bias-correction spatial disaggregation is used to downscale GCMs outputs, and bias correction is applied for PRECIS outputs, which demonstrate better improvement to a bias within ±0.2°C for Tm, Tmax, Tmin, and DTR and ±2 days for FD and HD. Furthermore, such improvement is also verified by the evidence of increased spatial correlation coefficient and symmetrical uncertainty, decreased root-mean-square error, and lower standard deviation for reproductions. It is seen from comprehensive ranking metrics that different downscaled models show the most improvement across different climatic regions, implying that optional ensembles of models should be adopted to provide sufficient high-quality climate information. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reanalysis datasets have been widely used in meteorological research, including studies of Northeast China cold vortices (NCCVs), where these datasets act as effective substitutes for observations. However, to date, no studies have focused on their performance in reproducing NCCVs. To address this knowledge gap, we adopted an automatic three-step identification algorithm (TIA) and used it to detect NCCVs from ERA5 and MERRA-2 reanalysis datasets spanning 39 warm seasons (May–September) during the period from 1980 to 2018. A comparative method was employed for a rough verification of the characteristics of the reproduced NCCVs. Moreover, a dataset derived from 1370 Chinese ground-based observational stations was used to verify the performance of the reanalysis models in reproducing the precipitation and air temperature associated with NCCVs. The results show that the TIA identified the majority of NCCVs, with an accuracy of approximately 90% from ERA5 or MERRA-2. Both reanalysis models can reproduce the characteristics of NCCVs (including location, strength, and duration), and both replicate air temperature better than precipitation. ERA5 and MERRA-2 showed strong consistency in reproducing the central longitude, central latitude, central height, and range of NCCVs, with correlation coefficients of 0.974, 0.972, 0.996, and 0.919, respectively, at the 99.9% significance level. The daily average 2-m temperatures in both reanalysis datasets were in good agreement with observations; however, overestimations of approximately 7°–8°C arose in steep high-altitude regions. In addition, both models tended to overestimate light rain (≤5 mm day−1) by approximately 1.2 mm and underestimate heavy rain (≥20 mm day−1) by over 6.7 mm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]