Search

From 2004 to 2010, the Sino-German research group MAGIM (Matter fluxes of Grasslands in Inner Mongolia as affected by grazing) ran a grazing experiment in a typical steppe ecosystem in Inner Mongolia, North China. Multiple ecological effects of grazing, climate variability and topography on plant and animal productivity, plant species composition change, decomposition and mineralization, soil nitrogen and organic matter distributions and dynamics, soil physics and chemistry, and soil-atmosphere gas exchange were measured in fenced plots with defined stocking rates and under different grazing management systems. This paper reviews and synthesizes the most important outcomes, conclusions, and open questions from the different project groups, as published in 125 ISI articles. While greenhouse gas fluxes, plant properties, and livestock performance were particularly responsive to (inter-) annual climate variability, soil properties were more affected by grazing intensity. Various management options based on the project results for semi-arid grasslands under changing climatic conditions are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: In arid lands, the shifts in dominant plant types from grasses to shrubs can significantly alter the ecosystem function and biogeochemistry cycles. However, the magnitude of these alterations and its inherent mechanisms are still poorly understood. In this study, we measured soil respiration and NPP over two growing seasons in 2006–2007 in the co-occurring perennial grass and desert shrub ecosystems at the Ordos Plateau of Inner Mongolia, China. Over the two growing seasons, the desert shrub site presented higher aboveground biomass and NPP while lower soil respiration relative to the grass site (p < 0.05). In this paper, we can not determine that whether vegetation conversion or soil texture change drive the site difference in soil respiration because we did not control for soil texture. We suppose that the site difference in pulse response of soil respiration might play an essential role in regulating this soil respiration gap. In all the growing seasons, surface soil moisture (0–10 cm) was identified as the major driver of soil respiration at both sites. Compared to the linear soil moisture model, the integrated model incorporating both surface soil moisture and air temperature was performed better in predicting the dynamics of soil respiration. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]