Search

Objective:   To provide certified athletic trainers, physicians, and other health care and fitness professionals with recommendations based on current evidence regarding the prevention of noncontact and indirect-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in athletes and physically active individuals., Background:   Preventing ACL injuries during sport and physical activity may dramatically decrease medical costs and long-term disability. Implementing ACL injury-prevention training programs may improve an individual's neuromuscular control and lower extremity biomechanics and thereby reduce the risk of injury. Recent evidence indicates that ACL injuries may be prevented through the use of multicomponent neuromuscular-training programs., Recommendations:   Multicomponent injury-prevention training programs are recommended for reducing noncontact and indirect-contact ACL injuries and strongly recommended for reducing noncontact and indirect-contact knee injuries during physical activity. These programs are advocated for improving balance, lower extremity biomechanics, muscle activation, functional performance, strength, and power, as well as decreasing landing impact forces. A multicomponent injury-prevention training program should, at minimum, provide feedback on movement technique in at least 3 of the following exercise categories: strength, plyometrics, agility, balance, and flexibility. Further guidance on training dosage, intensity, and implementation recommendations is offered in this statement.

Context: Excessive knee valgus during dynamic tasks is thought to contribute to lower extremity overuse and traumatic injuries. Clinically, assessments of frontal-plane knee motion typically include measures of the distance between the knees during landing. However, it is not clear how this clinical assessment relates to knee-abduction angle or how it is influenced by the position of the lower extremities in the transverse and frontal planes., Objective: To determine whether normalized knee separation distance (NKSD) is a predictor of knee-abduction angles and to assess the influence of lower extremity transverse-plane and frontal-plane angles on NKSD during a drop land., Design: Cross-sectional study., Setting: Motion analysis laboratory., Patients or Other Participants: Twenty-five healthy female athletes., Intervention(s): The frontal-plane distance between the 2-dimensional coordinates of markers over the greater trochanters (intertrochanteric distance), lateral femoral epicondyles (knee separation distance), and lateral malleoli (stance width) bilaterally was calculated during a drop land. The knee separation distance was normalized by intertrochanteric distance (NKSD). Concurrently, 3-dimensional lower extremity transverse-plane and frontal-plane kinematics were obtained., Main Outcome Measure(s): We assessed NKSD, stance width, and bilateral average knee and hip transverse plane and frontal-plane angles and ankle frontal-plane angles. Linear regression was used to determine the association between NKSD and bilateral average knee frontal-plane angles. Stepwise multiple regression was used to identify the best predictors of NKSD during the drop land., Results: After we controlled for stance width, NKSD explained 52% of the variance in the knee frontal-plane angle. When we took lower extremity kinematics into account, after controlling for stance width, the average hip frontal-plane angle was the best predictor of NKSD, explaining 97% of the variance., Conclusions: Although NKSD is a predictor of knee-abduction angle, frontal-plane hip angle and stance width are strongly related to NKSD. Caution must be taken when interpreting NKSD as knee abduction.