1. Identification, functional studies, and genomic comparisons of new members of the NnrR regulon in Rhodobacter sphaeroides
- Author
-
Hartsock, Angela and Shapleigh, James P.
- Subjects
Proteobacteria -- Genetic aspects ,Proteobacteria -- Research ,Promoters (Genetics) -- Research ,Denitrification -- Research ,Genetic regulation -- Research ,Biological sciences - Abstract
Analysis of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.3 genome revealed four previously unidentified sequences similar to the binding site of the transcriptional regulator NnrR. Expression studies demonstrated that three of these sequences are within the promoters of genes, designated paz, norEF, and cdgA, in the NnrR regulon, while the status of the fourth sequence, within the tat operon promoter, remains uncertain, nnrV, under control of a previously identified NnrR site, was also identified, paz encodes a pseudoazurin that is a donor of electrons to nitrite reductase, paz inactivation did not decrease nitrite reductase activity, but loss of pseudoazurin and cytochrome [c.sub.2] together reduced nitrite reduction. Inactivation of norEF reduced nitrite and nitric oxide reductase activity and increased the sensitivity to nitrite in a taxis assay. This suggests that loss of norEF increases NO production as a result of decreased nitric oxide reductase activity. 2.4.3 is the only strain of R. sphaeroides with norEF, even though all four of the strains whose genomes have been sequenced have the norCBQD operon and nnrR. norEF was shown to provide resistance to nitrite when it was mobilized into R. sphaeroides strain 2.4.1 containing nirK. Inactivation of the other identified genes did not reveal any detectable denitrification-related phenotype. The distribution of members of the NnrR regulon in R. sphaeroides revealed patterns of coselection of structural genes with the ancillary genes identified here. The strong coselection of these genes indicates their functional importance under real-world conditions, even though inactivation of the majority of them does not impact denitrification under laboratory conditions. doi: 10.1128/JB.01026-09
- Published
- 2010