Search

DNA damage is unavoidable, and organisms across the evolutionary spectrum possess DNA repair pathways that are critical for cell viability and genomic stability. To understand the role of base excision repair (BER) in protecting eukaryotic cells against alkylating agents, we generated Schizosaccharomyces pombe strains mutant for the mag1 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase gene. We report that S. pombe mag1 mutants have only a slightly increased sensitivity to methylation damage, suggesting that Mag1-initiated BER plays a surprisingly minor role in alkylation resistance in this organism. We go on to show that other DNA repair pathways play a larger role than BER in alkylation resistance. Mutations in genes involved in nucleotide excision repair ( rad13 ) and recombinational repair ( rhp51 ) are much more alkylation sensitive than mag1 mutants. In addition, S. pombe mutant for the flap endonuclease rad2 gene, whose precise function in DNA repair is unclear, were also more alkylation sensitive than mag1 mutants. Further, mag1 and rad13 interact synergistically for alkylation resistance, and mag1 and rhp51 display a surprisingly complex genetic interaction. A model for the role of BER in the generation of alkylation-induced DNA strand breaks in S. pombe is discussed.

Escherichia coli strains that are deficient in the Ada and Ogt DNA repair methyltransferases display an elevated spontaneous G:C-to-A:T transition mutation rate, and this increase has been attributed to mutagenic O 6 -alkylguanine lesions being formed via the alkylation of DNA by endogenous metabolites. Here we test the frequently cited hypothesis that S -adenosylmethionine (SAM) can act as a weak alkylating agent in vivo and that it contributes to endogenous DNA alkylation. By regulating the expression of the rat liver SAM synthetase and the bacteriophage T3 SAM hydrolase proteins in E. coli , a 100-fold range of SAM levels could be achieved. However, neither increasing nor decreasing SAM levels significantly affected spontaneous mutation rates, leading us to conclude that SAM is not a major contributor to the endogenous formation of O 6 -methylguanine lesions in E. coli .

The alkB gene is one of a group of alkylation-inducible genes in Escherichia coli, and its product protects cells from SN2-type alkylating agents such as methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). However, the precise biochemical function of the AlkB protein remains unknown. Here, we describe the cloning, sequencing, and characterization of three Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes (YFW1, YFW12, and YFW16) that functionally complement E. coli alkB mutant cells. DNA sequence analysis showed that none of the three gene products have any amino acid sequence homology with the AlkB protein. The YFW1 and YFW12 proteins are highly serine and threonine rich, and YFW1 contains a stretch of 28 hydrophobic residues, indicating that it may be a membrane protein. The YFW16 gene turned out to be allelic with the S. cerevisiae STE11 gene. STE11 is a protein kinase known to be involved in pheromone signal transduction in S. cerevisiae; however, the kinase activity is not required for MMS resistance because mutant STE11 proteins lacking kinase activity could still complement E. coli alkB mutants. Despite the fact that YFW1, YFW12, and YFW16/STE11 each confer substantial MMS resistance upon E. coli alkB cells, S. cerevisiae null mutants for each gene were not MMS sensitive. Whether these three genes provide alkylation resistance in E. coli via an alkB-like mechanism remains to be determined, but protection appears to be specific for AlkB-deficient E. coli because none of the genes protect other alkylation-sensitive E. coli strains from killing by MMS.

Escherichia coli can ameliorate the toxic effects of alkylating agents either by preventing DNA alkylation or by repairing DNA alkylation damage. The alkylation-sensitive phenotype of E. coli alkB mutants marks the alkB pathway as an extremely effective defense mechanism against the cytotoxic effects of the SN2, but not the SN1, alkylating agents. Although it is clear that AlkB helps cells to better handle alkylated DNA, no DNA alkylation repair function could be assigned to the purified AlkB protein, suggesting that AlkB either acts as part of a complex or acts to regulate the expression of other genes whose products are directly responsible for alkylation resistance. However, here we present evidence that the provision of alkylation resistance is an intrinsic function of the AlkB protein per se. We expressed the E. coli AlkB protein in two human cell lines and found that it confers the same characteristic alkylation-resistant phenotype in this foreign environment as it does in E. coli. AlkB expression rendered human cells extremely resistant to cell killing by the SN2 but not the SN1 alkylating agents but did not affect the ability of dimethyl sulfate (an SN2 agent) to alkylate the genome. We infer that SN2 agents produce a class of DNA damage that is not efficiently produced by SN1 agents and that AlkB somehow prevents this damage from killing the cell.

Inappropriate expression of 3-methyladenine (3MeA) DNA glycosylases has been shown to have harmful effects on microbial and mammalian cells. To understand the underlying reasons for this phenomenon, we have determined how DNA glycosylase activity and substrate specificity modulate glycosylase effects in Escherichia coli . We compared the effects of two 3MeA DNA glycosylases with very different substrate ranges, namely, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mag1 and the E. coli Tag glycosylases. Both glycosylases increased spontaneous mutation, decreased cell viability, and sensitized E. coli to killing by the alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate. However, Tag had much less harmful effects than Mag1. The difference between the two enzymes’ effects may be accounted for by the fact that Tag almost exclusively excises 3MeA lesions, whereas Mag1 excises a broad range of alkylated and other purines. We infer that the DNA lesions responsible for changes in spontaneous mutation, viability, and alkylation sensitivity are abasic sites and secondary lesions resulting from processing abasic sites via the base excision repair pathway.

Escherichia coli expresses two DNA repair methyltransferases (MTases) that repair the mutagenic O6-methylguanine (O6MeG) and O4-methylthymine (O4MeT) DNA lesions; one is the product of the inducible ada gene, and here we confirm that the other is the product of the constitutive ogt gene. We have generated various ogt disruption mutants. Double mutants (ada ogt) do not express any O6MeG/O4MeT DNA MTases, indicating that Ada and Ogt are probably the only two O6MeG/O4MeT DNA MTases in E. coli. ogt mutants were more sensitive to alkylation-induced mutation, and mutants arose linearly with dose, unlike ogt+ cells, which had a threshold dose below which no mutants accumulated; this ogt(+)-dependent threshold was seen in both ada+ and ada strains. ogt mutants were also more sensitive to alkylation-induced killing (in an ada background), and overexpression of the Ogt MTase from a plasmid provided ada, but not ada+, cells with increased resistance to killing by alkylating agents. The induction of the adaptive response was normal in ogt mutants. We infer from these results that the Ogt MTase prevents mutagenesis by low levels of alkylating agents and that, in ada cells, the Ogt MTase also protects cells from killing by alkylating agents. We also found that ada ogt E. coli had a higher rate of spontaneous mutation than wild-type, ada, and ogt cells and that this increased mutation occurred in nondividing cells. We infer that there is an endogenous source of O6MeG or O4MeT DNA damage in E. coli that is prevalent in nondividing cells.

The Escherichia coli Ada and Ogt DNA methyltransferases (MTases) are known to transfer simple alkyl groups from O6-alkylguanine and O4-alkylthymine, directly restoring these alkylated DNA lesions to guanine and thymine. In addition to being exquisitely sensitive to the mutagenic effects of methylating agents, E. coli ada ogt null mutants display a higher spontaneous mutation rate than the wild type. Here, we determined which base substitution mutations are elevated in the MTase-deficient cells by monitoring the reversion of six mutated lacZ alleles that revert via each of the six possible base substitution mutations. During exponential growth, the spontaneous rate of G:C to A:T transitions and G:C to C:G transversions was elevated about fourfold in ada ogt double mutant versus wild-type E. coli. Furthermore, compared with the wild type, stationary populations of the MTase-deficient E. coli (under lactose selection) displayed increased G:C to A:T and A:T to G:C transitions (10- and 3-fold, respectively) and increased G:C to C:G, A:T to C:G, and A:T to T:A transversions (10-, 2.5-, and 1.7-fold, respectively). ada and ogt single mutants did not suffer elevated spontaneous mutation rates for any base substitution event, and the cloned ada and ogt genes each restored wild-type spontaneous mutation rates to the ada ogt MTase-deficient strains. We infer that both the Ada MTase and the Ogt MTase can repair the endogenously produced DNA lesions responsible for each of the five base substitution events that are elevated in MTase-deficient cells. Simple methylating and ethylating agents induced G:C to A:T and A:T to G:C transitions in these strains but did not significantly induce G:C to C:G, A:T to C:G, and A:T to T:A transversions. We deduce that S-adenosylmethionine (known to e a weak methylating agent) is not the only metabolite responsible for endogenous DNA alkylation and that at least some of the endogenous metabolites that cause O-alkyl DNA damage in E. coli are not simple methylating or ethylating agents.

Escherichia coli has two DNA repair methyltransferases (MTases): the 39-kilodalton (kDa) Ada protein, which can undergo proteolysis to an active 19-kDa fragment, and the 19-kDa DNA MTase II. We characterized DNA MTase II in cell extracts of an ada deletion mutant and compared it with the purified 19-kDa Ada fragment. Like Ada, DNA MTase II repaired O6-methylguanine (O6MeG) lesions via transfer of the methyl group from DNA to a cysteine residue in the MTase. Substrate competition experiments indicated that DNA MTase II repaired O4-methylthymine lesions by transfer of the methyl group to the same active site within the DNA MTase II molecule. The repair kinetics of DNA MTase II were similar to those of Ada; both repaired O6MeG in double-stranded DNA much more efficiently than O6MeG in single-stranded DNA. Chronic pretreatment of ada deletion mutants with sublethal (adapting) levels of two alkylating agents resulted in the depletion of DNA MTase II. Thus, unlike Ada, DNA MTase II did not appear to be induced in response to chronic DNA alkylation at least in this ada deletion strain. DNA MTase II was much more heat labile than Ada. Heat lability studies indicated that more than 95% of the MTase in unadapted E. coli was DNA MTase II. We discuss the possible implications of these results for the mechanism of induction of the adaptive response. A similarly active 19-kDa O6MeG-O4-methylthymine DNA MTase was identified in Salmonella typhimurium.