1. The role of affect-driven impulsivity in gambling cognitions: A convenience-sample study with a Spanish version of the Gambling-Related Cognitions Scale
- Author
-
Susana Jiménez-Murcia, Juan F. Navas, José C. Perales, Trevor Steward, Fernando Fernández-Aranda, Francesco Del Prete, and Tian P. S. Oei
- Subjects
Male ,Psychometrics ,Full-Length Report ,gambling cognitions ,030508 substance abuse ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,impulsivity ,Sample (statistics) ,Impulsivity ,Affect (psychology) ,psychometric tools ,03 medical and health sciences ,Young Adult ,0302 clinical medicine ,Cognition ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,medicine ,cognitive biases ,Humans ,Set (psychology) ,Afecte (Psicologia) ,Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ,gambling disorder ,Joc compulsiu ,General Medicine ,Cognitive bias ,Confirmatory factor analysis ,Affect (Psychology) ,030227 psychiatry ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Clinical Psychology ,Compulsive behavior ,Affect ,Scale (social sciences) ,Cognició ,Gambling ,Impulsive Behavior ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,0305 other medical science ,Psychology ,Conducta compulsiva ,Compulsive gambling ,Factor Analysis, Statistical ,Clinical psychology - Abstract
Background and aims: abnormal cognitions are among the most salient domain-specific features of gambling disorder. The aims of this study were: (a) to examine and validate a Spanish version of the Gambling-Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS; Raylu & Oei, 2004) and (b) to examine associations between cognitive distortion levels, impulsivity, and gambling behavior. Methods: this study first recruited a convenience sample of 500 adults who had gambled during the previous year. Participants were assessed using the Spanish version of GRCS (GRCS-S) questionnaire, the UPPS-P impulsivity questionnaire, measures of gambling behavior, and potentially relevant confounders. Robust confirmatory factor analysis methods on half the sample were used to select the best models from a hypothesis-driven set. The best solutions were validated on the other half, and the resulting factors were later correlated with impulsivity dimensions (in the whole n = 500 factor analysis sample) and clinically relevant gambling indices (in a separate convenience sample of 137 disordered and non-disordered gamblers; validity sample). Results: this study supports the original five-factor model, suggests an alternative four-factor solution, and confirms the psychometric soundness of the GRCS-S. Importantly, cognitive distortions consistently correlated with affect-or motivation-driven aspects of impulsivity (urgency and sensation seeking), but not with cognitive impulsivity (lack of premeditation and lack of perseverance). Discussion and conclusions: our findings suggest that the GRCS-S is a valid and reliable instrument to identify gambling cognitions in Spanish samples. Our results expand upon previous research signaling specific associations between gambling-related distortions and affect-driven impulsivity in line with models of motivated reasoning.
- Published
- 2017