Search

Genome rearrangement events are widely used to estimate a minimum-size sequence of mutations capable of transforming a genome into another. The length of this sequence is called distance, and determining it is the main goal in genome rearrangement distance problems. Problems in the genome rearrangement field differ regarding the set of rearrangement events allowed and the genome representation. In this work, we consider the scenario where the genomes share the same set of genes, gene orientation is known or unknown, and intergenic regions (structures between a pair of genes and at the extremities of the genome) are taken into account. We use two models, the first model allows only conservative events (reversals and moves), and the second model includes non-conservative events (insertions and deletions) in the intergenic regions. We show that both models result in NP-hard problems no matter if gene orientation is known or unknown. When the information regarding the orientation of genes is available, we present for both models an approximation algorithm with a factor of 2. For the scenario where this information is unavailable, we propose a 4-approximation algorithm for both models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Problems in the genome rearrangement field are often formulated in terms of pairwise genome comparison: given two genomes G 1 and G 2 , find the minimum number of genome rearrangements that may have occurred during the evolutionary process. This broad definition lacks at least two important considerations: the first being which features are extracted from genomes to create a useful mathematical model, and the second being which types of genome rearrangement events should be represented. Regarding the first consideration, seminal works in the genome rearrangement field solely used gene order to represent genomes as permutations of integer numbers, neglecting many important aspects like gene duplication, intergenic regions, and complex interactions between genes. Regarding the second consideration, some rearrangement events are widely studied such as reversals and transpositions. In this paper, we shed light on the first consideration and created a model that takes into account gene order and the number of nucleotides in intergenic regions. In addition, we consider events of reversals, transpositions, and indels (insertions and deletions) of genomic material. We present a 4-approximation algorithm for reversals and indels, a 4. 5 -approximation algorithm for transpositions and indels, and a 6-approximation for reversals, transpositions, and indels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the field of comparative genomics, one way of comparing two genomes is through the analysis of how they distinguish themselves based on a set of mutations called rearrangement events. When considering that genomes undergo different types of rearrangements, it can be assumed that some events are more common than others. To model this assumption, one can assign different weights to different events, where common events tend to cost less than others. However, this approach, called weighted, does not guarantee that the rearrangement assumed to be the most frequent will be also the most frequently returned by proposed algorithms. To overcome this issue, we investigate a new problem where we seek the shortest sequence of rearrangement events able to transform one genome into the other, with a restriction regarding the proportion between the events returned. Here, we consider two rearrangement events: reversal, that inverts the order and the orientation of the genes inside a segment of the genome, and transposition, that moves a segment of the genome to another position. We show the complexity of this problem for any desired proportion considering scenarios where the orientation of the genes is known or unknown. We also develop an approximation algorithm with a constant approximation factor for each scenario and, in particular, we describe an improved (asymptotic) approximation algorithm for the case where the gene orientation is known. At last, we present the experimental tests comparing the proposed algorithms with others from the literature for the version of the problem without the proportion restriction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]