Search

Rotaviruses rapidly activate NF-kappaB and induce the secretion of selected chemokines after infection. The ability of rotavirus particles lacking genomic RNA to activate NF-kappaB suggested that rotavirus proteins direct cell signaling responses. We identified conserved TNFR-associated factor (TRAF) binding motifs within the rotavirus capsid protein VP4 and its N-terminal VP8* cleavage product. TRAFs (-1, -2, and -3) are bound by the rhesus rotavirus VP8* protein through three discrete TRAF binding domains. Expression of VP4 or VP8* from rhesus or human rotaviruses induced a 5-7-fold increase in NF-kappaB activity and synergistically enhanced TRAF2-mediated NF-kappaB activation. Mutagenesis of VP8* TRAF binding motifs abolished VP8* binding to TRAFs and the ability of the protein to activate NF-kappaB. Expression of pathway-specific dominant negative (DN) inhibitors DN-TRAF2 or DN-NF-kappaB-inducing kinase also abolished VP8*-, VP4-, or rotavirus-mediated NF-kappaB activation. These findings demonstrate that rotavirus primarily activates NF-kappaB through a TRAF2-NF-kappaB-inducing kinase signaling pathway and that VP4 and VP8* proteins direct pathway activation through interactions with cellular TRAFs. In contrast, transcriptional responses from AP-1 reporters were inhibited 5-fold by VP8* and were not activated by rotavirus infection, suggesting the differential regulation of TRAF2 signaling responses by VP8*. VP8* blocked JNK activation directed by TRAF2 or TRAF5 but had no effect on JNK activation directed by TRAF6 or MEKK1. This establishes that fully cytoplasmic rotaviruses selectively engage signaling pathways, which regulate cellular transcriptional responses. These findings also demonstrate that TRAF2 interactions can disengage JNK signaling from NF-kappaB activation and thereby provide a new means for TRAF2 interactions to determine pathway-specific responses.

The regulation by tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) of its own promoter has been investigated by transient transfection and nuclear protein binding assays. In human K652 erythroleukemia cells TNF produced an 8-10-fold activation of the human TNF promoter linked to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene. The TNF-responsive element was localized to the -125 to -82 region by examining the TNF activation in 5'-deletion or site-directed mutants of the TNF promoter and by demonstrating that the -125 to -82 fragment confers TNF responsiveness to the thymidine kinase promoter. This region contains a palindrome, 5' TGAGCTCA 3', that resembles the consensus binding sequences for the transcription factors, activator protein-1 (AP-1), cyclic AMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB), and activation transcription factor (ATF). An internal deletion in the palindrome abolished the TNF responsiveness, whereas known AP-1 and CREB/ATF elements were unresponsive to TNF. In band shift analyses a nuclear factor from U937 cells specifically bound to the -125 to -82 TNF-responsive fragment in or near the palindromic sequence. Oligonucleotides containing AP-1 or CREB/ATF sites did not effectively compete for the binding, indicating that the U937 cell factor is different from these factors. Anti-c-fos antiserum did not affect binding of the U937 cell factor, whereas anti-c-jun antiserum did block its binding, indicating that either c-jun or a protein antigenically related to c-jun is a component of the factor. These results suggest that the TNF-responsive element is not activated by AP-1 or CREB in U937 cells and that a novel DNA binding factor is important for constitutive and inducible TNF gene expression.