Search

Approximately 17 years after the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) epidemic, the world is currently facing the COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). According to the most optimistic projections, it will take more than a year to develop a vaccine, so the best short-term strategy may lie in identifying virus-specific targets for small molecule-based interventions. All coronaviruses utilize a molecular mechanism called programmed -1 ribosomal frameshift (-1 PRF) to control the relative expression of their proteins. Previous analyses of SARS-CoV have revealed that it employs a structurally unique three-stemmed mRNA pseudoknot that stimulates high -1 PRF rates and that it also harbors a -1 PRF attenuation element. Altering -1 PRF activity impairs virus replication, suggesting that this activity may be therapeutically targeted. Here, we comparatively analyzed the SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 frameshift signals. Structural and functional analyses revealed that both elements promote similar -1 PRF rates and that silent coding mutations in the slippery sites and in all three stems of the pseudoknot strongly ablate -1 PRF activity. We noted that the upstream attenuator hairpin activity is also functionally retained in both viruses, despite differences in the primary sequence in this region. Small-angle X-ray scattering analyses indicated that the pseudoknots in SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 have the same conformation. Finally, a small molecule previously shown to bind the SARS-CoV pseudoknot and inhibit -1 PRF was similarly effective against -1 PRF in SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that such frameshift inhibitors may be promising lead compounds to combat the current COVID-19 pandemic.

Most cellular RNAs engage in intrastrand base-pairing that gives rise to complex three-dimensional folds. This self-pairing presents an impediment toward binding of the RNA by nucleic acid-based ligands. An important step in the discovery of RNA-targeting ligands is therefore to identify those regions in a folded RNA that are accessible toward the nucleic acid-based ligand. Because the folding of RNA targets can involve interactions between nonadjacent regions and employ both Watson-Crick and non-Watson-Crick base-pairing, screening of candidate binder ensembles is typically necessary. Microarray-based screening approaches have shown great promise in this regard and have suggested that achieving complete sequence coverage would be a valuable attribute of a next generation system. Here, we report a custom microarray displaying a library of RNA-interacting polynucleotides comprising all possible 2'-OMe RNA sequences from 4- to 8-nucleotides in length. We demonstrate the utility of this array in identifying RNA-interacting polynucleotides that bind tightly and specifically to the highly conserved, functionally essential template/pseudoknot domain of human telomerase RNA and that inhibit telomerase function in vitro.

Nearly all members of a widespread family of bacterial transposable elements related to insertion sequence 3 (IS3), therefore called the IS3 family, very likely use programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting to produce their transposase, a protein required for mobility. Comparative analysis of the potential frameshift signals in this family suggested that most of the insertion sequences from the IS51 group contain in their mRNA an elaborate pseudoknot that could act as a recoding stimulator. It results from a specific intramolecular interaction between an apical loop and an internal loop from two stem-loop structures. Directed mutagenesis, chemical probing, and gel mobility assays of the frameshift region of one element from the IS51 group, IS3411, provided clear evidences of the existence of the predicted structure. Modeling was used to generate a three-dimensional molecular representation of the apical loop-internal loop complex. We could demonstrate that mutations affecting the stability of the structure reduce both frameshifting and transposition, thus establishing the biological importance of this new type of RNA structure for the control of transposition level.

tmRNA rescues stalled ribosomes in eubacteria by forcing the ribosome to abandon its mRNA template and resume translation with tmRNA itself as a template. Pseudoknot 1 (pk1), immediately upstream of this coding region in tmRNA, is a structural element that is considered essential for tmRNA function based on the analysis of pk1 mutants in vitro. pk1 binds near the ribosomal decoding site and may make base-specific contacts with tmRNA ligands. To study pk1 structure and function in vivo, we have developed a genetic selection that ties the life of Escherichia coli cells to tmRNA activity. Mutation of pk1 at 20% per base and selection for tmRNA activity yielded sequences that retain the same pseudoknot fold. In contrast, selection of active mutants from 10(6) completely random sequences identified hairpin structures that functionally replace pk1. Rational design of a hairpin with increased stability using an unrelated sequence yielded a tmRNA mutant with nearly wild-type activity. We conclude that the role of pk1 in tmRNA function is purely structural and that it can be replaced with a variety of hairpin structures. Our results demonstrate that in the study of functional RNAs, the inactivity of a mutant designed to destroy a given structure should not be interpreted as proof that the structure is necessary for RNA function. Such mutations may only destabilize a global fold that could be formed equally well by an entirely different, stable structure.

A bioinformatics approach to finding new cases of -1 frameshifting in the expression of human genes revealed a classical retrovirus-like heptanucleotide shift site followed by a potential structural stimulator in the paraneoplastic antigen Ma3 and Ma5 genes. Analysis of the sequence 3' of the shift site demonstrated that an RNA pseudoknot in Ma3 is important for promoting efficient -1 frame-shifting. Ma3 is a member of a family of six genes in humans whose protein products contain homology to retroviral Gag proteins. The -1 frameshift site and pseudoknot structure are conserved in other mammals, but there are some sequence differences. Although the functions of the Ma genes are unknown, the serious neurological effects of ectopic expression in tumor cells indicate their importance in the brain.

Bacteria contain transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA), a molecule that during trans-translation tags incompletely translated proteins with a small peptide to signal the proteolytic destruction of defective polypeptides. TmRNA is composed of tRNA- and mRNA-like domains connected by several pseudoknots. Using truncated ribosomal protein L27 as a reporter for tagging in vitro and in vivo, we have developed exceptionally sensitive assays to study the role of Escherichia coli tmRNA in trans-translation. Site-directed mutagenesis experiments showed that pseudoknot 2 and the abutting helix 5 were particularly important for the binding of ribosomal protein S1 to tmRNA. Pseudoknot 4 not only facilitated tmRNA maturation but also promoted tagging. In addition, the three pseudoknots (pk2 to pk4) were shown to play a significant role in the proper folding of the tRNA-like domain. Protein SmpB enhanced tmRNA processing, suggesting a new role for SmpB in trans-translation. Taken together, these results provide unanticipated insights into the functions of the pseudoknots and protein SmpB during tmRNA folding, maturation, and protein synthesis.

The ribonucleoprotein telomerase is a specialized reverse transcriptase minimally composed of an RNA, TER, and a protein catalytic subunit, TERT. The TER and TERT subunits of telomerase associate to form a dimeric enzyme in several organisms, including human. A small portion of TER, the template domain, is used by telomerase for the synthesis of tandem repeats of telomeric DNA. We studied some of the requirements for processive template usage by human telomerase. A blunt-ended duplex DNA primer was not utilized by telomerase. With a duplex telomeric DNA primer, a single-stranded 3' overhang with a minimum length of approximately 6 bases was required for efficient priming activity. Large substitutions in the human TER templating domain did not abolish enzymatic activity, although insertion of two residues into this sequence reduced processivity, as did a template mutation that results in a mismatch between the template region used for copying DNA and the region used for alignment of the substrate primer. Finally, by using a complementary pair of catalytically inactive telomerase RNA pseudoknot mutants in combination with a marked template, we demonstrated that processive synthesis by an obligatory dimer of human telomerase does not require template switching. These results indicate that processive template usage by human telomerase, like that of Tetrahymena telomerase, is strongly dependent on the base identities in the template domain and that a dimeric human telomerase can processively utilize a single template.

Triplet repeats that cause human genetic diseases have been shown to exhibit unusual compact structures in DNA, and in this paper we show that similar structures exist in shorter "normal length" CNG RNA. CUG and control RNAs were made chemically and by in vitro transcription. We find that "normal" short CUG RNAs migrate anomalously fast on non-denaturing gels, compared with control oligos of similar base composition. By contrast, longer tracts approaching clinically relevant lengths appear to form higher order structures. The CD spectrum of shorter tracts is similar to triplex and pseudoknot nucleic acid structures and different from classical hairpin spectra. A model is outlined that enables the base stacking features of poly(r(G-C))(2).poly(r(U)) or poly(d(G-C))(2).poly(d(T)) triplexes to be achieved, even by a single 15-mer.

Ribosomal protein S4 represses synthesis of the four ribosomal proteins (including itself) in theEscherichia coli α operon by binding to a nested pseudoknot structure that spans the ribosome binding site. A model for the repression mechanism previously proposed two unusual features: (i) the mRNA switches between conformations that are “active” or “inactive” in translation, with S4 as an allosteric effector of the inactive form, and (ii) S4 holds the 30 S subunit in an unproductive complex on the mRNA (“entrapment”), in contrast to direct competition between repressor and ribosome binding (“displacement”). These two key points have been experimentally tested. First, it is found that the mRNA pseudoknot exists in an equilibrium between two conformers with different electrophoretic mobilities. S4 selectively binds to one form of the RNA, as predicted for an allosteric effector; binding of ribosomal 30 S subunits is nearly equal in the two forms. Second, we have used S4 labeled at a unique cysteine with either of two fluorophores to characterize its interactions with mRNA and 30 S subunits. Equilibrium experiments detect the formation of a specific ternary complex of S4, mRNA pseudoknot, and 30 S subunits. The existence of this ternary complex is unambiguous evidence for translational repression of the α operon by an entrapment mechanism.

The antisense Inc RNA encoded by the IncIalpha ColIb-P9 plasmid replicon controls the translation of repZ encoding the replication initiator and its leader peptide repY at different rates with different mechanisms. The initial loop-loop base pairing between Inc RNA and the target in the repZ mRNA leader inhibits formation of a pseudoknot required for repZ translation. A subsequent base pairing at the 5' leader of Inc RNA blocks repY translation. To delineate the molecular basis for the differential control, we analyzed the intermediate complexes formed between RepZ mRNA and Inc RNA(54), a 5'-truncated Inc RNA derivative. We found that the initial base pairing at the loops transforms into a more stable intermediate complex by its propagation in both directions. The resulting extensive base pairing indicates that the inhibition of the pseudoknot formation is established at this stage. Furthermore, the region of extensive base pairing includes bases different in related plasmids showing different incompatibility. Thus, the observed extensive base pairing is important for determining the incompatibility of the low-copy-number plasmids. We discuss the evolution of replication control systems found in IncIalpha, IncB, and IncFII group plasmids.

The autonomous replication region of plasmid ColIb-P9 contains repZ encoding the RepZ replication protein, and inc and repY as the negative and positive regulators of repZ translation, respectively. inc encodes the antisense Inc RNA, and repY is a short open reading frame upstream of repZ. Translation of repY enables repZ translation by inducing formation of a pseudoknot containing stem-loop I, which base pairs with the sequence preceding the repZ start codon. Inc RNA inhibits both repY translation and formation of the pseudoknot by binding to the loop I. To investigate control of repY expression by Inc RNA, we isolated a number of mutations that express repY in the presence of Inc RNA. One class of mutations delete a part of another stem-loop (II), which derepresses repY expression by initiating translation at codon 10 (GUG), located within this structure. Point mutations in stem-loop II can also derepress repY translation, and the introduction of compensatory base-changes restores control of repY translation. These results not only indicate that suppressing a cryptic start codon by secondary structure is important for maintaining the translational control of repZ but also demonstrate that the position of start site for repY translation is critical for its control by Inc RNA. Thus, Inc RNA controls repY translation by binding in the vicinity of the start codon, in contrast to the control of repZ expression at the level of loop-loop interaction.

Translation initiation of the repZ gene encoding the replication initiator of plasmid ColIb-P9 is not only negatively regulated by the action of the antisense Inc RNA encoded in the leader region, but is also coupled to the translation and termination of a transcribed leader sequence, repY, a positive regulatory element for repZ gene expression. This translational coupling depends on base pairing between two complementary sequences, 5'-rGGCG-3' and 5'-rCGCC-3', which are located upstream of and in the middle of repY, respectively, and have the potential to form a pseudoknot with the stem-loop structure I. Another stem-loop called structure III near the 3'-end of repY sequesters both the 5'-rCGCC-3' sequence and the repZ ribosome-binding site. Here we show that the RepZ mRNA leader sequence synthesized in vitro indeed contains several stem-loop structures including structures I and III, but not the pseudoknot. However, disruption of structure III, without changing the repZ ribosome-binding site, by means of base substitution and deletion induces base pairing between the two short complementary sequences distantly separated, resulting in the formation of a pseudoknot. When the pseudoknot is allowed to form in vivo due to the same mutations, a maximum level of repZ expression is obtained comparable to one observed in the absence of Inc RNA. These results strengthen our previously proposed model that the pseudoknot induced by the translation and termination of the repY reading frame functions as the molecular switch for translational initiation of the repZ gene.

Bacteriophage phi 29 of Bacillus subtilis packages its double-stranded DNA genome into a preformed prohead in an ATP-dependent reaction. A 174-residue phi 29-encoded RNA molecule (pRNA) is a structural component of the prohead and is essential for DNA packaging. The secondary and tertiary structures of the prohead binding site on pRNA have been probed using a series of specific mutant pRNAs and by measuring binding to RNA-free proheads and in vitro packaging of the DNA-gene product 3 (DNA.gp3) complex. A pseudoknot in pRNA inferred from phylogenetic studies was confirmed with specific mutations, and this pseudoknot was necessary for DNA.gp3 packaging activity. pRNA was truncated progressively from the 5' and 3' ends to isolate the prohead binding site, and three truncated pRNAs of 79, 71, and 62 residues retained prohead binding activity but could not reconstitute proheads for DNA.gp3 packaging. Mutation resulting in changes of the D hairpin loop and its connecting residues within the prohead binding site of pRNA and DNA packaging studies demonstrated that some alteration of secondary structure in this helix was permissible. The analyses provided further confirmation of a discrete prohead binding domain in pRNA and further delineated specific structural requirements for DNA.gp3 packaging activity which may not be required for prohead binding.

Gene 32 protein (gp32), a single-stranded DNA-binding protein from bacteriophage T4, contains a zinc-binding subdomain with sequence homologies to the 3-cysteine/1-histidine zinc-binding motif found in a variety of retroviruses and plant viruses. In vitro studies suggest that autoregulation of gp32 occurs at the level of translation by gp32 specifically binding gene 32 mRNA at an unusual stem-loop structure that can be modeled as an RNA pseudoknot. Nucleation of gp32 binding via this pseudoknot is thought to be needed to facilitate cooperative binding of gp32 through a largely unstructured region that overlaps the ribosome binding site (McPheeters, D. S., Stormo, G. D., and Gold, L. (1988) J. Mol. Biol. 201, 517-535). Removal of Zn(II) from gp32 results in a protein that retains the ability to bind single-stranded RNA with high affinity but is unable to specifically autoregulate itself at the level of translation. Deletion of the pseudoknot sequences from the gene 32 autoregulatory region results in an mRNA that cannot be repressed by gp32. These results suggest that the zinc-binding subdomain of gp32 plays an essential role in autoregulation by providing a critical element necessary for nucleating cooperative binding at the gene 32 mRNA pseudoknot.

The 3'-terminal tRNA-like structure of the tobacco mosaic virus RNA interacts with ATP/CTP:tRNA nucleotidyltransferases from Escherichia coli or yeast in much the same manner as do tRNAs. Primary sites of interaction cluster near the 3' end and in the loop proposed to be analogous to the psi-loop of a tRNA. Some modified bases in the tRNA-like structure inhibit interaction with nucleotidyltransferase, yet the analogous bases in a tRNA do not. The location of some of these nucleotides within the analog to the psi-loop suggests that this structure differs slightly from its counterpart in a tRNA. The location of other such bases in the helical stem near the 3' end can be explained if the pseudoknot is disrupted by these modified bases or if the tertiary structure of the RNA is altered in the enzyme-RNA complex. A partially denatured secondary structure that persists on denaturing gels is proposed.