Search

Previous studies from our laboratories have implicated two members of the Pur family of single-stranded DNA/RNA-binding proteins, Purα and Purβ, in transcriptional repression of the smooth muscle α-actin gene in vascular cell types. Although Purα and Purβ share substantial sequence homology and nucleic acid binding properties, genomic promoter and cis-element occupancy studies reported herein suggest that Purβ is the dominant factor in gene regulation. To dissect the molecular basis of Purβ repressor activity, site-directed mutagenesis was used to map amino acids critical to the physical and functional interaction of Purβ with the smooth muscle α-actin promoter. Of all the various acidic, basic, and aromatic residues studied, mutation of positionally conserved arginines in the class I or class II repeat modules significantly attenuated Purβ repressor activity in transfected vascular smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts. DNA binding and protein-protein interaction assays were conducted with purified recombinant Purβ and selected mutants to reveal the physical basis for loss-of-function. Mutants R57E, R57E/R96E, and R57A/R96A each exhibited reduced single-stranded DNA binding affinity for an essential promoter element and diminished interaction with corepressor YB-1/MSY1. Structural analyses of the R57A/R96A and R57E/R96E double mutants in comparison to the wild-type Purβ homodimer revealed aberrant self-association into higher order oligomeric complexes, which correlated with decreased α-helical content and defective DNA and protein binding in vitro. These findings point to a previously unrecognized structural role for certain core arginine residues in forming a conformationally stable Purβ protein capable of physical interactions necessary for smooth muscle α-actin gene repression.

Purbeta is a gene regulatory factor belonging to a family of highly conserved nucleic acid-binding proteins related by their ability to preferentially bind single-stranded DNA or RNA sequences rich in purine nucleotides. In conjunction with Puralpha, Purbeta has been implicated in transcriptional and translational repression of genes encoding contractile proteins found in the heart and vasculature. Although several models of sequence-specific DNA recognition, strand separation, and activator inhibition by oligomeric Puralpha and Purbeta have been proposed, it is currently unclear whether protein-protein interaction is a prerequisite to, or a consequence of nucleic acid binding. In this study, a recombinant protein purification scheme was devised to yield homogenous mouse Purbeta devoid of nucleic acid. Recombinant Purbeta was then subjected to light scattering and analytical ultracentrifugation analyses to assess the size, shape, and oligomeric state of the purified protein in solution. Results of laser light scattering and sedimentation velocity experiments indicated that Purbeta reversibly self-associates in the absence of nucleic acid. Both approaches independently showed that the hydrodynamic shape of the Purbeta homodimer is markedly asymmetric and non-spherical. Sedimentation velocity analyses indicated that dimeric Purbeta has a sedimentation coefficient of 3.96 Svedberg, a frictional coefficient ratio (f/f(0)) of 1.60, and a hydrodynamic radius of 4.43 nm. These values were consistent with those determined by independent dynamic light scattering studies. Sedimentation equilibrium analyses confirmed that Purbeta self-associates in a reversible monomer-dimer equilibrium characterized by a K(d) = 1.13 +/- 0.27 microm.

Plasticity of smooth muscle alpha-actin gene expression in fibroblasts and vascular smooth muscle cells is mediated by opposing effects of transcriptional activators and repressors. Among these factors, three single-stranded DNA-binding proteins, Puralpha, Purbeta, and MSY1, have been implicated as coregulators of a cryptic 5'-enhancer module. In this study, a molecular analysis of Purbeta, the least well characterized member of this group, was conducted. Southwestern and Northwestern blotting of purified Purbeta deletion mutants using smooth muscle alpha-actin-derived probes mapped the minimal single-stranded DNA/RNA-binding domain to a conserved region spanning amino acids 37-263. Quantitative binding assays indicated that the relative affinity and specificity of Purbeta for single-stranded DNA were influenced by purine/pyrimidine content; by non-conserved regions outside amino acids 37-263; and by cell-derived proteins, specifically MSY1. When overexpressed in A7r5 vascular smooth muscle cells, Purbeta (but not Puralpha) inhibited transcription of a smooth muscle-specific mouse alpha-actin promoter transgene. Structural domains required for Purbeta repressor activity included the minimal DNA-binding region and a C-terminal domain required for stabilizing high affinity protein and nucleic acid interactions. Purbeta inhibitory activity in transfected A7r5 cells was potentiated by MSY1, but antagonized by serum response factor, reinforcing the idea that interplay among activators and repressors may account for phenotypic changes in smooth muscle alpha-actin-expressing cell types.

An asymmetric polypurine-polypyrimidinecis-element located in the 5′ region of the mouse vascular smooth muscle α-actin gene serves as a binding site for multiple proteins with specific affinity for either single- or double-stranded DNA. Here, we test the hypothesis that single-stranded DNA-binding proteins are responsible for preventing a cryptic MCAT enhancer centered within this element from cooperating with a nearby serum response factor-interacting CArG motif to trans-activate the minimal promoter in fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells. DNA binding studies revealed that the core MCAT sequence mediates binding of transcription enhancer factor-1 to the double-stranded polypurine-polypyrimidine element while flanking nucleotides account for interaction of Purα and Purβ with the purine-rich strand and MSY1 with the complementary pyrimidine-rich strand. Mutations that selectively impaired high affinity single-stranded DNA binding by fibroblast or smooth muscle cell-derived Purα, Purβ, and MSY1in vitro, released the cryptic MCAT enhancer from repression in transfected cells. Additional experiments indicated that Purα, Purβ, and MSY1 also interact specifically, albeit weakly, with double-stranded DNA and with transcription enhancer factor-1. These results are consistent with two plausible models of cryptic MCAT enhancer regulation by Purα, Purβ, and MSY1 involving either competitive single-stranded DNA binding or masking of MCAT-bound transcription enhancer factor-1.

Transcriptional activity of the mouse vascular smooth muscle alpha-actin gene in fibroblasts is regulated, in part, by a 30-base pair asymmetric polypurine-polypyrimidine tract containing an essential MCAT enhancer motif. The double-stranded form of this sequence serves as a binding site for a transcription enhancer factor 1-related protein while the separated single strands interact with two distinct DNA binding activities termed VACssBF1 and 2 (Cogan, J. G., Sun, S., Stoflet, E. S., Schmidt, L. J., Getz, M. J., and Strauch, A. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 11310-11321; Sun, S., Stoflet, E. S., Cogan, J. G., Strauch, A. R., and Getz, M. J. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 2429-2936). VACssBF2 has been recently cloned and shown to consist of two closely related proteins, Puralpha and Purbeta (Kelm, R. J., Elder, P. K., Strauch, A. R., and Getz, M. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 26727-26733). In this study, we demonstrate that Puralpha and Purbeta interact with each other via highly specific protein-protein interactions and bind to the purine-rich strand of the MCAT enhancer in the form of both homo- and heteromeric complexes. Moreover, both Pur proteins interact with MSY1, a VACssBF1-like protein cloned by virtue of its affinity for the pyrimidine-rich strand of the enhancer. Interactions between Puralpha, Purbeta, and MSY1 do not require the participation of DNA. Combinatorial interactions between these three single-stranded DNA-binding proteins may be important in regulating activity of the smooth muscle alpha-actin MCAT enhancer in fibroblasts.

Transcriptional repression of the mouse vascular smooth muscle alpha-actin gene in fibroblasts and myoblasts is mediated, in part, by the interaction of two single-stranded DNA binding activities with opposite strands of an essential transcription enhancer factor-1 recognition element (Sun, S., Stoflet, E. S., Cogan, J. G., Strauch, A. R., and Getz, M. J. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 2429-2436). One of these activities, previously designated vascular actin single-stranded DNA-binding factor 2 includes two distinct polypeptides (p44 and p46) which specifically interact with the purine-rich strand of both the enhancer and a related element in a protein coding exon of the gene (Kelm, R. J., Jr., Sun, S., Strauch, A. R., and Getz, M. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 24278-24285). Expression screening of a mouse lung cDNA library with a vascular actin single-stranded DNA-binding factor 2 recognition element has now resulted in the isolation of two distinct cDNA clones that encode p46 and p44. One of these proteins is identical to Puralpha, a retinoblastoma-binding protein previously implicated in both transcriptional activation and DNA replication. The other is a related family member, presumably Purbeta. Comparative band shift and Southwestern blot analyses conducted with cellular p46, p44, and cloned Pur proteins synthesized in vitro and in vivo, establish identity of p46 with Puralpha and p44 with Purbeta. This study implicates Puralpha and/or Purbeta in the control of vascular smooth muscle alpha-actin gene transcription.

In this study we report that bone and platelet osteonectin are structurally and functionally heterogeneous in terms of glycosylation and collagen binding capacity. The relative sensitivity of bone and platelet osteonectin to specific glycosidases was used to evaluate potential differences in glycosylation. Although native bone and platelet osteonectin are electrophoretically nonidentical, N-glycanase treatment yielded products with the same apparent molecular weight. Bone osteonectin was also susceptible to cleavage by endo H but not to neuraminidase, while platelet osteonectin was susceptible to neuraminidase but not to endo H. In lectin blotting experiments of bone and platelet osteonectin, concanavalin A bound specifically to bone osteonectin but not to platelet osteonectin. However, Lens culinaris agglutinin bound to platelet osteonectin but not to bone osteonectin. These data suggest that bone and platelet osteonectin differ in their oligosaccharide side chain structures, with bone osteonectin possessing a high mannose-type and platelet osteonectin, a complex-type structure. Solid-phase binding techniques were used to functionally evaluate bone and platelet osteonectin in terms of collagen binding. Although bone osteonectin bound specifically to types I, III, and V collagen, platelet osteonectin had no apparent affinity for these collagen types suggesting that the two proteins are also functionally distinct.