Search

We present a review and comparison of several recent differential equations models of treatment of HIV-1 infection. We seek to clarify the role of the natural anti-HIV immune response and determine its effect upon optimal treatment schemes. In this paper, we consider systems in which treatment is expressed as a forcing function, as well as those in which we determine optimal treatment via control theoretic techniques. The primary goal of this study is to compare treatment schemes for systems in which a natural nonconstant immune response of the patient is considered explicitly with those that consider implicitly a constant non-specific immune response. We find that when the natural immune response can be boosted sufficiently, drug levels may not need to be as high as previously supposed. This implies that a treatment scenario in which intervals of drug treatment are alternated with some form of immune-boosting therapy may be highly beneficial in terms of reducing toxicity to the patient. Additionally, in developing countries where HIV infection is widespread and sufficient funds are not available to supply rigourous drug regimens, the implications of these models are profound, as they suggest methods of treating HIV at a minimal cost. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, neglecting the effects of free virus, we consider a simple model of cell-to-cell spread of HIV-1. We discuss the impact of the CD8+ cell non-cytotoxic anti-viral response (CNAR) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity on infection by HIV-1. Two types of models are considered: the ordinary differential equation (ODE) model and the discrete time delay differential equation (DDE) system. The steady states of the ODE model are globally asymptotically stable respectively under two threshold criteria. In the DDE model, the global stability of the infected steady state of the ODE model becomes only ultimately stable. Moreover, at a certain interval of the time delay, the DDE model will produce Hopf bifurcation or periodic solutions. The introduction of CTL and CNAR will change the values of these steady states and induce fluctuations in the cell concentration. It also affects the critical value of the time delay and is of utility in the interpretation of typical HIV-dynamics data resulting from clinical trials. The DDE model produces sustained infective oscillations in some real parameter values, which is different from the result of the similar cell-free viral spread model with delay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]