Search

Identification of modified amino acids can be a challenging part for Edman degradation sequence analysis, largely because they are not included among the commonly used phenylthiohydantion amino acid standards. Yet many can have unique retention times and can be assigned by an experienced researcher or through the use of a guide showing their typical chromatography characteristics. The Edman Sequencing Research Group (ESRG) 2005 study is a continuation of the 2004 study, in which the participating laboratories were provided a synthetic peptide and asked to identify the modified amino acids present in the sequence. The study sample provided an opportunity to sequence a peptide containing a variety of modified amino acids and note their retention times relative to the common amino acids. It also allowed the ESRG to compile the chromatographic properties and intensities from multiple instruments and tabulate an average elution position for these modified amino acids on commonly used instruments. Participating laboratories were given 2000 pmoles of a synthetic peptide, 18 amino acids long, containing the following modified amino acids: dimethyl- and trimethyl-lysine, 3-methyl-histidine, N-carbamyl-lysine, cystine, N-methyl-alanine, and isoaspartic acid. The modified amino acids were interspersed with standard amino acids to help in the assessment of initial and repetitive yields. In addition to filling in an assignment sheet, which included retention times and peak areas, participants were asked to provide specific details about the parameters used for the sequencing run. References for some of the modified amino acid elution characteristics were provided and the participants had the option of viewing a list of the modified amino acids present in the peptide at the ESRG Web site. The ABRF ESRG 2005 sample is the seventeenth in a series of studies designed to aid laboratories in evaluating their abilities to obtain and interpret amino acid sequence data.

The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities 2003 Edman Sequencing Research Group (ABRF-ESRG'03) sample is the 15th in a series of studies designed to allow participating members to evaluate their abilities to analyze the N-terminus of a protein or peptide using automated Edman degradation chemistry. It is a follow-up study to the ESRG'02 sample, which was a single protein with a heterogeneous N-terminus. Both the 2002 and 2003 samples were obtained from the same protein complex and were resolved by SDS-PAGE followed by electrophoretic transfer to PVDF membrane. The ABRF-ESRG'03 sample had an apparent molecular weight of 49 kDa and a single N-terminus, with initial yields of approximately 2 pmol. Participants were asked to sequence 25 residues and return their results to the ESRG for analysis along with two completed surveys and an area/pmol table for repetitive and initial yield calculations. Data for 46 responses are presented which include initial yields, repetitive yields, sequencer performance, and ability to identify the protein.

The ABRF-2002 Edman Sequencing Research Group (ESRG) sample (ABRF-2002ESRG) was the 14th in a yearly series designed as an education and self-evaluation tool for laboratories performing Edman sequence analysis. This year's study used a known protein with a heterogeneous amino-terminus, and thus was one of the more challenging protein samples distributed by an Association for Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) research group. The sample was originally submitted to an ESRG member's lab, and after analysis was thought to demonstrate an analytical problem that would be of interest to the general sequencing community. The protein was purified using commercially available, pre-cast sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride.Protein bands were distributed to 72 members of the ABRF who requested ABRF-2002ESRG, along with a data instruction sheet and a brief survey. Participating members were requested to report observed raw data, interpret the data as they normally would for an investigator, and identify the protein using a database search. Study results from 31 responses are presented to show how labs fared with a difficult but sequenceable sample.