Search

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of concurrent treatment with vitamin K2 and risedronate compared with treatment with risedronate alone in patients with osteoporosis and to explore subsets of patients for which concurrent treatment is particularly efficacious. Women with osteoporosis aged 65 years or older were recruited from 123 institutes in Japan and allocated to take either vitamin K2 (45 mg/day) and risedronate (2.5 mg/day or 17.5 mg/week) or risedronate (2.5 mg/day or 17.5 mg/week) alone. The primary end point was the incidence of any fracture (vertebral and nonvertebral). The secondary end points were bone mineral density, height, undercarboxylated osteocalcin concentration, quality of life, and safety. Over a 2-year follow-up, vertebral or nonvertebral fractures occurred in 117 or 22 sites respectively among 931 patients in the risedronate and vitamin K2 group and in 104 or 26 sites respectively among 943 patients in the risedronate alone group. The rates of any incident fracture were similar between the two groups (incidence rate ratio 1.074, 95 % confidence interval 0.811-1.422, p = 0.62), implying that the primary end point was not met. There were no differences in the degree of increase in bone mineral density between the two groups. Undercarboxylated osteocalcin concentration decreased from 5.81 ± 3.93 ng/mL to 2.59 ± 1.52 ng/mL at 6 months in the risedronate and vitamin K2 group, whereas the change in the risedronate alone group was minimal (from 5.96 ± 4.36 ng/mL to 4.05 ± 3.40 ng/mL at 6 months) (p

This study examined whether the global clinical data for bazedoxifene could be extrapolated to a Japanese population by evaluating the results of a phase 2 study in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis as compared to those of a pivotal, phase 3 study. The efficacy of bazedoxifene 20 and 40 mg versus placebo on lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers, lipid profile, incidence of fractures, and safety parameters was compared between the Japanese phase 2 study (N = 429) and the global phase 3 study (N = 7,492) during a 2-year period. In the primary population for assessment of bridging, differences in the mean percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD at 2 years relative to placebo were greater for women treated with bazedoxifene 20 and 40 mg in the phase 2 study than in the phase 3 study. BMD changes in the bazedoxifene groups were confirmed to be similar between the phase 2 study population and a subset of the phase 3 study population with similar baseline characteristics. The effects of bazedoxifene on incidence of fractures, bone turnover markers, and lipid metabolism were similar between studies. There were no major differences in safety parameters between studies. The greater improvement in lumbar spine BMD and similar results in bone turnover markers, fracture incidence, and safety profile observed with bazedoxifene in the phase 2 study compared with the phase 3 study confirmed the feasibility of extrapolating the global clinical data to a Japanese population.

In 1995, the Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Metabolism (now the Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research) established the Osteoporosis Diagnostic Criteria Review Committee. Following discussion held at the 13th scientific meeting of the Society in 1996, the Committee, with the consensus of its members, proposed diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis. The Committee revised those criteria in 1998 and again in 2000. The Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research and Japan Osteoporosis Society Joint Review Committee for the Revision of the Diagnostic Criteria for Primary Osteoporosis aimed at obtaining international consistency and made a revised edition based on the new findings in 2012.

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of concurrent treatment with vitamin K

The aim of osteoporosis treatment is to prevent future fractures. Although concurrent treatment has been used very frequently for osteoporosis in clinical practice, there are no data on accurate and verified effectiveness of concurrent treatment for fracture prevention in patients with osteoporosis. To clarify the clinical usefulness of concurrent treatment, the Japan Osteoporosis Society has authorized the establishment of the A-TOP (Adequate Treatment of Osteoporosis) research group. The objective of this research is to establish a design for a clinical trial to prove whether concurrent treatment using both alfacalcidol (1-alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol) and alendronate is more effective as compared to treatment using alendronate alone in terms of fracture prevention. The present study was named JOINT (Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial) and is based on a method using national, prospective, randomized, open-labeled, blinded endpoints focusing on postmenopausal osteoporosis with a high risk for fracture. The patients were mainly selected by practitioners and allocated randomly by a central registration system into two groups, of which one received 5 mg/day of alendronate alone, and the other received 1 μg/day of 1-alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol (alfacalcidol) in addition to the alendronate. The endpoints focused primarily on fracture prevention, and the patients' quality of life (QOL) and change in body height, as well as adherence and the adverse events of the treatments were evaluated secondarily. To obtain sufficient statistical power in the events during a 2-year observation period, the patients who are expected to have higher risk were selected to participate in this study, and it was decided that the final plan would involve 890 patients per group (two-sided alpha = 0.05, power = 0.8). Data collection began in November 2003. Correspondence regarding the registration of the investigator and the progress of the study was conducted through a web system from the Public Health Research Foundation to practitioners.

Patients who are diagnosed with osteoporosis and beginning treatment often discontinue their osteoporosis medication relatively early after the start of treatment because of their poor recognition of fracture risk and the asymptomatic nature of osteoporosis. In this study we aimed to assess adherence to treatment with 1 microg alfacalcidol (D), 60 mg raloxifene (R) or a combination of both (D + R) for 1 year in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis or osteopenia. We defined persistence of D and R as continuing to take tablets for more than 7 of any 14 days immediately before the 1-year visit. A total of 137 subjects aged 49-81 years [64.9 +/- 7.0 years, 16.0 +/- 12.7 years since menopause (YSM)] were randomly assigned to each treatment group. The proportions persisting with each treatment group at 1 year were 61.4, 65.3, 55.1% for D, R and D + R groups, respectively whereas the compliance to each therapy as judged by the medical possession ratio (MPR) at 1 year were 77.5, 93.8, 78.4%, respectively. There were no significant differences in persistence, compliance and the number of subjects who discontinued treatment due to adverse events among each group. We found significant inverse correlations in percent changes at 1 year between compliance and serum BAP in R and D + R groups or urinary (u-) CTX in the R group. The changes in the level of serum BAP and u-CTX were significantly higher in high-compliance patients (MPR > 80%) treated with raloxifene alone or concomitantly with alfacalcidol compared to those in low-compliance patients.

New diagnostic criteria of primary osteoporosis (2000 version) was presented. The basic concepts are as follows. Firstly, estimation of low bone mass should be made by lumbar BMD by DXA. However, when measurement of lumbar BMD is not appropriate due to fracture or deformities of the spine, hip, radial, calcaneal, or metacarpal BMD should be used. X ray picture of the spine should be used when DXA is not available. Secondary, in cases with fragility fractures, or in cases with BMD below 70% of young adult mean, differential diagnosis should be made in order to rule out other diseases with low BMD than primary osteoporosis.

Vitamin D insufficiency is prevalent in osteopenic and osteoporotic postmenopausal women. The persistent increase in circulating parathyroid hormone (PTH) caused by vitamin D insufficiency reduces bone density response to antiresorptive agents in these postmenopausal women. It is not well known whether administration of raloxifene might increase serum PTH secondary to the suppression of serum calcium in postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis. We tried to assess whether raloxifene might affect serum PTH and whether the addition of alfacalcidol to raloxifene therapy could have favorable effects on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover as compared to raloxifene-alone therapy in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis or osteopenia (≤2.0 SD based on young Japanese women). A total of 169 subjects were randomly assigned to groups receiving 60 mg raloxifene (R), or 1 μg alfacalcidol (D), or a combination of both (R + D) for 2 years. Serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] were measured at randomization. The modified ‘intention to treat’ method was used. We compared the groups using a Tukey–Kramer test for changes in L- and TH-BMD and calcium metabolism when significant differences were found using one-way ANOVA. The parameters in each group during the experimental period were analyzed by means of paired t tests. Baseline 25(OH)D and i-PTH were 23.7 ng/ml and 38.4 pg/ml, respectively. At 6 months, i-PTH demonstrated a significant increase (+21.0%) in the R-group whereas significant decreases in i-PTH were observed in the D-group and combination-group (−15.9 and −8.9%, respectively). There were significant increases in L-BMD in the R + D-group (+4.1% at 1 year and +4.7% at 2 years, P < 0.0001) and in the R-group (+2.9% at 1 year and +2.8% at 2 years, P < 0.001), but the difference between the groups did not reach a significant level. Vitamin D status at randomization did not affect the subsequent BMD response in coadministration of alfacalcidol with raloxifene. Supplementation with alfacalcidol to raloxifene therapy demonstrates a greater bone-sparing effect by suppressing the secondary increment of serum PTH than when raloxifene is used alone.

The Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research developed the Japanese Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (JOQOL) to evaluate the disease-specific Health-Related QOL, which is specific for osteoporosis of Japanese patients. JOQOL was revised in 2000; it consisted of 38 items with the scale graded from 0 to 4 and a total full score of 152. To elucidate the reliability and validity of the revised JOQOL, we enrolled 193 postmenopausal women as subjects and diagnosed them as having osteoporosis or osteopenia. The mean age of the subjects was 68.2 +/- 8 years; 58 subjects (30.1%) had at least one vertebral fracture. Among them, 83 patients were retested for reliability. The mean lapse from the time of test to that of retest was 23.7(+/- 9.5) days. The subjects were questioned using the JOQOL, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36), along with questions on subjects' characteristics and their ADL. The JOQOL scores at the test and the retest were significantly correlated (r = 0.973) without significant difference between their mean scores. All the JOQOL items showed significant correlations at the test and the retest (Kendall's tau = 0.599-0.947). Cronbach's alpha coefficient of JOQOL was 0.918. These results proved the high reliability of JOQOL. The JOQOL score showed negative correlation with age (r = -0.183). The subjects with vertebral fractures had significantly lower JOQOL scores than the subjects without fractures. The JOQOL showed a significant correlation with all the scores in each domain of eight of SF-36 (r = 0.350-0.839). These results were consistent with that of the preceding study. It is concluded that the reliability and the validity of JOQOL were demonstrated in this study.

We conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label 2-year trial with 76 postmenopausal women agedor =60 years with low (T-score less than -1) lumbar bone mineral density (BMD). The hormone replacement therapy (HRT) group received a low dose of conjugated estrogen (CEE) at a dose of 0.31 mg/day +/- medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 2.5 mg/day. Group HRT/D received the same dose of HRT together with alfacalcidol in a daily dose of 1.0 microg/day. Changes in lumbar BMD measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were followed every 6 months for 2 years. The lumbar BMD of group HRT increased 3.37% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6%-5.2%], 4.00% (95%CI 1.6%-6.4%), and 2.32% (95%CI -0.7% to 5.3%) at 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively, when the baseline value was taken as 0%. Lumbar BMD of group HRT/D showed a significant increase beyond 6 months. The percent increases for this group at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 6.18 (95%CI 1.3%-6.6%), 6.18% (95%CI 3.9%-8.5%), 7.17% (95%CI 4.3%-10.0%), and 8.75% (95%CI 6.0%-11.5%), respectively. In addition, there was a significant difference in the changes of the lumbar BMD between the two groups at 24 months, suggesting that the combination of HRT and alfacalcidol is more effective than HRT alone in terms of the BMD effect. This study is the first prospective trial demonstrating an additive effect of alfacalcidol on lumbar BMD in postmenopausal women receiving low-dose HRT. It suggests that the combination therapy can be considered to be a promising mode of treatment for bone loss after menopause.

1 Department of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Molecular Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, Japan 2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan 4 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan 5 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama City University Medical School, Yokohama, Japan 6Research Institute and Practice for Involutional Diseases, Nagano, Japan 7 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan 8 Endocrinology Section, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Tokyo Japan 9 Department of Geriatric Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan 10 R & D Department, Mitsubishi Kagaku BCL, Tokyo, Japan