Search

Introduction: Ground glass opacity featured lung adenocarcinomas (GGO-LUAD) display more indolent biological behavior than solid nodule featured lung adenocarcinomas (SN-LUAD) and have an excellent prognosis. However, the cellular immune characteristics of GGO-LUAD remain poorly understood. Methods: Immunohistochemistry technique was performed to stain related immune markers (CD8, CD103, CD20, CD138, CD4, FOXP3, CD68, CD163, PD-1 and PD-L1) and TGF-β from 15 patients with pure GGO-LUAD and 15 patients with SN-LUAD tissue sections (Paired cohort), and then, the related markers with significant differences were verified on 10 patients (Verified cohort) with both pure GGO-LUAD and SN-LUAD. For localization analysis of CD68 + tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and FOXP3 + Terg cells in tumor areas, pure GGO-LUAD and SN-LUAD were also stained for simultaneous detection of pan-CK, CD68 and FOXP3 by multiplex immunofluorescence. Results: In the Paired cohort, compared with SN-LUAD, only the infiltration of TAMs and Treg cells was significantly lower in GGO-LUAD. The infiltration of the remaining immune cells including CD8 + T cells, CD4 + T cells, CD103 + T cells, CD20 + B cells and CD138 + Plasma cells in GGO-LUAD, although relatively low, was not significantly different. Meanwhile, the expression of TGF-β was significantly higher in SN-LUAD. And the above results have also been confirmed in the Verified cohort. Moreover, there was no significantly difference in PD-L1 expression in GGO-LUAD compared to SN-LUAD both in the Paired cohort and Verified cohort. Conclusions: GGO-LUAD demonstrates an overall less active immune landscape as compared with SN-LUAD. TAMs and TGF-β may play an important role in the progression of GGO-LUAD. More importantly, PD-L1 expression in GGO-LUAD is comparable to that in SN-LUAD, indicating that there may be other reasons for the insensitivity of GGO-LUAD to immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: UGT1A1*28/*6 as predictors of severe irinotecan-related diarrhea (SIRD) were duplicated by many studies. However, some patients of lower risk genotype ( UGT1A1*1/*1) still suffered SIRD and the extremely low frequency of UGT1A1*6/*6 limited its clinical usage. Previous studies proved that the transforming growth factor (TGFB) family may have some effect on MTX-induced mucositis. However, the associations between TGFB gene variants and SIRD have never been reported so far. Our aim was to improve the predictive value of UGT1A1 gene variants on SIRD. Methods: Six SNPs ( TGFB1 rs1800469; TGFBR1 rs10733710, rs334354 and rs6478974; TGFBR2 rs3087465; UGT1A1*6) and UGT1A1*28 were selected for genotyping in 160 metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with irinotecan in a prospective multicenter trial (NCT01282658). Results: UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*28, rs1800469 and rs3087465 were all associated with SIRD ( p = 0.026, 0.014, 0.047 and 0.045 respectively). A novel genetic score model (with a cut off value of 1.5) based on them was created to predict SIRD (OR = 11.718; 95 % CI 2.489-55.157, p = 0.002). In patients of gene score > 1.5, the risk of SIRD was much higher (23.5 vs. 2.8 %, p = 2.24E−04) and continued in the first 6 cycles of chemotherapy, while in patients with gene score ≤1.5, the risk was much lower and none of them suffered SIRD after the first cycle of chemotherapy ( p = 0.0003). Conclusions: The novel genetic score model improved the predictive value of UGT1A1 on SIRD. If validated, it will provide valuable information for clinical use of irinotecan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]