Search

Introduction: Carfilzomib plus dexamethasone (Kd) is widely used in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, the treatment outcomes of Kd, especially in trial-unfit patients, have not been extensively studied in the real-world setting. Methods: We analyzed the outcomes of 152 RRMM patients who received Kd at our hospitals from April 2018 to March 2022. Results: At the commencement of Kd, patients received a median of two (range 1–7) lines of prior anti-myeloma therapy. According to the ENDEAVOR study criteria, 93 (61.2%) and 59 (38.8%) patients were classified as the trial-fit and the trial-unfit group, respectively. The overall response (OR) rate for the entire cohort was 71.1% (95% CI 63.2–78.1%). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.6 months (95% CI 3.9–6.9 months) and 24.0 months (95% CI 13.4–38.0 months), respectively. There was no significant difference in the OR rate between the trial-fit and the trial-unfit groups (76.3% vs. 62.7%; P = 0.105). However, the median PFS (3.6 months vs. 7.3 months; P < 0.001) and OS (15.0 vs. 36.8 months; P = 0.009) were significantly shorter in the trial-unfit group. On multivariate analysis, trial-fitness (unfit vs. fit) remained a significant covariate influencing the TRM (HR: 4.84, 95% CI 1.66–14.06; P = 0.004) and PFS (HR: 1.82, 95% CI 1.27–2.62; P = 0.001). Conclusion: Our data suggest that the treatment outcomes of Kd are acceptable in the real-world setting with significant differences between the trial-fit and the trial-unfit groups, although they are relatively inferior to those of a pivotal trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) and lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) remain the standard treatments for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). This study aimed to compare real-world benefits between the two regimens. We also were interested in exploring efficacy according to subsequent therapy following VMP or Rd. Methods: A total of 559 NDMM patients treated with VMP (n = 443, 79.2%) or Rd (n = 116, 20.8%) was recruited retrospectively from a multicenter database. Results: Rd provided more benefits than VMP—overall response rate: 92.2 vs. 81.8%, p = 0.018; median progression-free survival (PFS): 20.0 vs. 14.5 months, p <0.001; second PFS (PFS2): 43.9 vs. 36.9 months, p = 0.012; overall survival (OS): 100.1 vs. 85.0 months, p = 0.017. Multivariable analysis revealed significant benefits of Rd over VMP, with hazard ratios of 0.722, 0.627, and 0.586 for PFS, PFS2, and OS, respectively. In propensity score-matched cohorts with matched VMP (n = 201) and Rd (n = 67) arms to balance baseline characteristics, Rd still showed significantly better outcomes for PFS, PFS2, and OS than VMP. Following VMP failure, triplet therapy showed significant benefits for response and PFS2; after Rd failure, PFS2 with carfilzomib-dexamethasone was significantly better than bortezomib-based doublet treatment. Conclusion: These real-world findings may assist with better selection between VMP and Rd as well as subsequent therapy for NDMM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]