Search

Background Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a valuable option in patients with bioprosthetic failure. However, potential issues with ViV TAVR may occur in patients with high-risk anatomy for coronary obstruction and patients with baseline smaller bioprosthetic valves at risk for patient prosthesis mismatch. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to use preoperative electrocardiography-gated, multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) to (1) identify which would be high risk for coronary occlusion with ViV TAVR, and (2) predict intraoperative SAVR sizing. Methods Among 223 patients from our institutions' database that underwent SAVR for aortic insufficiency (AI) or aortic stenosis (AS) between January 2012 and January 2020, 48 patients had MDCT imaging before surgery (AI; n = 31, AS; n = 17). Of all patients, 67% (n = 32) were bicuspid morphology. Results With the use of virtual valve implantation, all patients with AI and bicuspid AS had feasible anatomy for ViV TAVR, while 38% of patients with tricuspid AS were high risk for coronary obstruction. There was a strong correlation between actual valve size implanted and preoperative MDCT measurements using annulus average diameter, area, and/or perimeter. Conclusion Preoperative MDCT in patients undergoing SAVR is a useful tool for lifetime management, particularly in patients with tricuspid AS. Decisions for surgical management may change based on MDCT's ability to predict intraoperative SAVR size and determine which patients may be high-risk candidates for future ViV TAVR due to coronary artery obstruction.

BACKGROUND There is, as yet, no broad consensus regarding the optimal surgical approach for patients requiring reoperative mitral valve surgery. Consequently, we sought to evaluate the perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing redo mitral surgery via right mini thoracotomy as compared with traditional resternotomy. METHODS A comprehensive retrospective review of our prospectively collected database was undertaken from January 2011 to December 2017. We propensity matched 90 patients who underwent reoperative mitral valve surgery via right mini thoracotomy with a concurrent cohort of patients who had redo median sternotomy. Intraoperative data and short-term clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS The 30-day mortality was 3.3% (six deaths) in the entire cohort, not significantly different between redo sternotomy and mini thoracotomy groups. Patients who had their procedure via right mini thoracotomy had reduced intensive care unit (P = .029) and overall hospital (P

Background There is still significant disagreement among surgeons about the best method for arterial cannulation to institute cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (STAADs). This study aimed to provide support for central aortic cannulation as a viable and preferable option, as it reduces time to institute CPB, operative times, and decreases the complexity of the procedure. Methods This study is a retrospective review of 34 patients who underwent STAAD repairs consecutively between October 2006 and January 2014. The sample was analyzed for method of cannulation, CPB time, cross-clamp time, circulatory arrest time, mortality, and complication rate. Statistical analysis was performed to compare a control group of patients who underwent nonaortic cannulation. Results The most common method of cannulation was the distal aortic arch, which also produced the lowest relative mortality. The 30-day mortality was found to be 17.6%. Arrhythmia, acute renal injury, and failure to extubate within 48 hours were the most frequent complications, and cerebrovascular accidents occurred in three patients (8.8%). Statistically significant differences in bypass and cardiac arrest times favored aortic cannulation. Conclusions This study supports the notion that central aortic cannulation is a viable option for CPB in STAAD repair, but further prospective, randomized trials are necessary for the procedure to replace peripheral cannulation techniques. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12411 (J Card Surg 2014;29:729–732)

The pathological variants of acute aortic syndromes include classic dissection, intramural hematomas, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers (PAUs). The subject of the appropriate management and treatment of PAUs continues to expand as this disease entity is increasingly identified. The application of thoracic endografting, or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), to treat these acute aortic pathologies is clearly evolving and the ultimate effectiveness and durability of thoracic endografting remains to be determined as clinical experience increases. The disease pathology of PAUs and the use of endovascular stent graft placement in PAU disease are closely examined in this manuscript.

There is still significant disagreement among surgeons about the best method for arterial cannulation to institute cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (STAADs). This study aimed to provide support for central aortic cannulation as a viable and preferable option, as it reduces time to institute CPB, operative times, and decreases the complexity of the procedure.This study is a retrospective review of 34 patients who underwent STAAD repairs consecutively between October 2006 and January 2014. The sample was analyzed for method of cannulation, CPB time, cross-clamp time, circulatory arrest time, mortality, and complication rate. Statistical analysis was performed to compare a control group of patients who underwent nonaortic cannulation.The most common method of cannulation was the distal aortic arch, which also produced the lowest relative mortality. The 30-day mortality was found to be 17.6%. Arrhythmia, acute renal injury, and failure to extubate within 48 hours were the most frequent complications, and cerebrovascular accidents occurred in three patients (8.8%). Statistically significant differences in bypass and cardiac arrest times favored aortic cannulation.This study supports the notion that central aortic cannulation is a viable option for CPB in STAAD repair, but further prospective, randomized trials are necessary for the procedure to replace peripheral cannulation techniques.