Search

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection is an uncommon, but not insignificant cause of acute coronary syndrome that overwhelmingly affects middle-aged women. The pathophysiology of coronary dissection appears to be an outside-in mechanism, where the initiating event is not an intimal tear but rather the formation of an intramural hematoma, which compromises blood flow by reducing the arterial lumen. Considering this mechanism, it is clear to see how intracoronary imaging techniques, such as optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound, are most accurate in the diagnosis. However, they carry a high rate of complications and are therefore generally avoided when the clinical scenario and angiographic appearance both support the diagnosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. The natural history of the disease is toward healing of the vessel wall and restoration of blood flow. Therefore, conservative medical management is the preferred approach unless there are high-risk factors such as hemodynamic instability, signs of ischemia and severe proximal or multivessel lesions, in which percutaneous or surgical revascularization should be considered. Perioperative evaluation of these patients must take into account several aspects of this disease. Most of these patients will be receiving single or dual antiplatelet therapy, so one must consider the timing of the event and the surgical hemorrhagic risk when deciding to stop these therapies. Extracoronary vascular disease also must be assessed because it can have an effect on patient monitoring and risk of postoperative complications., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest None., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published in Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 36 (2022) 2793-2802, http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2021.10.030. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Neuburger is a consultant for Medtronic. The remaining authors do not have any financial or personal conflicts of interest to disclose.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of escalation of respiratory support and prolonged postoperative invasive ventilation on patient-centered outcomes, and identify perioperative factors associated with these 2 respiratory complications., Design: A retrospective cohort analysis of cardiac surgical patients admitted to the cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) between August 2015 and January 2018. Escalation of respiratory support was defined as "unplanned continuous positive airway pressure," "non-invasive ventilation," or "reintubation" after surgery; prolonged invasive ventilation was defined as "invasive ventilation beyond the first 12 hours following surgery." The primary endpoint was the composite of escalation of respiratory support and prolonged ventilation., Setting: Tertiary cardiothoracic ICU., Participants: A total of 2,098 patients were included and analyzed., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: The composite of escalation of support or prolonged ventilation occurred in 509 patients (24.3%). Patients who met the composite had higher mortality (2.9% v 0.1%; p < 0.001) and longer median [interquartile range] length of ICU (2.1 [1.0-4.9] v 0.9 [0.8-1.0] days; p < 0.0001) and hospital (10.6 [8.0-16.0] v 7.2 [6.2-10.0] days; p < 0.0001) stay. Hypoxemia and anemia on admission to ICU were the only 2 factors independently associated with the need for escalation of respiratory support or prolonged invasive ventilation., Conclusions: Escalation of respiratory support or prolonged invasive ventilation is frequently seen in cardiac surgery patients and is highly associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Hypoxemia and anemia on admission to the ICU are potentially modifiable factors associated with escalation of respiratory support or prolonged invasive ventilation., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To assess postoperative pain intensity and the analgesic requirements in the postoperative period in patients undergoing sternotomy for pulmonary endarterectomy involving deep hypothermic circulatory arrest., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Single-center hospital study., Participants: Patients 18 years and older undergoing sternotomy for cardiac surgery between August 2012 and August 2014., Interventions: No modification to usual clinical practice., Measurements and Main Results: Intraoperative opioid and steroid administration, referral to the chronic pain unit, intensive care unit pain scores, and analgesic administration in the first 48 hours after the admission to the intensive care unit were recorded. Postoperative pain was evaluated by means of a categoric verbal scale from no pain (0) to severe pain (3); this is the routine analgesic scale used in the authors' intensive care unit. A total of 200 consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA group) were included in the study. No patient in the PEA group received morphine during surgery. The mean (standard deviation) postoperative pain intensity score at 24 hours was 0.30 (0.54) in the PEA group. Postoperative morphine was administered in 39% of patients. No PEA patient was referred to the chronic pain unit after hospital discharge., Conclusion: The total analgesic requirements and pain score of patients undergoing sternotomy for pulmonary endarterectomy with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest seemed to be low., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)