Search

Aims: The objective of this study is to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) and a hybrid approach that incorporates Computed Tomography Perfusion (CTP) in addition to CCTA (CCTA ​+ ​CTP) for the detection of in-stent restenosis (ISR), as defined by angiography., Methods: A comprehensive search of articles identified 18,513 studies. After removing duplicates, title/abstract screening, and full-text review, 17 CCTA and 3 CCTA ​+ ​CTP studies were included. Only studies using ≥64-slices multidetector computed tomography (CT) were considered eligible., Results: The per-patient ISR prevalence was 43 ​%, with 92 ​% of stents fully interpretable with CCTA. Meta-analysis exhibited a per-stent CCTA (n ​= ​2674) sensitivity of 90 ​% (95 ​% CI; 84-94 ​%), specificity of 89 ​% (95 ​% CI; 86-92 ​%), positive likelihood ratio of 7.17 (95 ​% CI; 5.24-9.61), negative likelihood ratio of 0.17 (95 ​% CI; 0.10-0.25), and diagnostic odds ratio of 45.7 (95 ​% CI; 22.71-82.43). Additional sensitivity analyses revealed no influence of stent diameter or strut thickness on the diagnostic yield of CCTA. The per-stent diagnostic performance of CCTA ​+ ​CTP (n ​= ​752) did not show differences compared to CCTA., Conclusions: With currently utilized scanners, CCTA and CCTA ​+ ​CTP demonstrated high diagnostic performance for in-stent restenosis evaluation. Consequently, a history of previous stent implantation should not be an argument to preclude using these methods in clinically suspected patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this study is to describe resources and outcomes of coronary computed tomography angiography plus Stress CT perfusion (CCTA ​+ ​Stress-CTP) and stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (Stress-CMR) in symptomatic patients with suspected or known CAD., Methods: Six hundred and twenty-four consecutive symptomatic patients with intermediate to high-risk pretest likelihood for CAD or previous history of revascularization referred to our hospital for clinically indicated CCTA ​+ ​Stress-CTP or Stress-CMR were enrolled. Stress-CTP scans were performed in 223 patients while 401 patients performed Stress-CMR. Patient follow-up was performed at 1 year after index test performance. Endpoints were all cardiac events, as a combined endpoint of revascularization, non-fatal MI and death, and hard cardiac events, as combined endpoint of non-fatal MI and death., Results: Twenty-nine percent of patients who underwent CCTA ​+ ​Stress-CTP received revascularization, 7% of subjects assessed with Stress-CMR were treated invasively, and a low number of non-fatal MI and death was observed with both strategies (hard events in 0.4% of patients that had CCTA ​+ ​Stress-CTP as index test, and in 3% of patients evaluated with Stress-CMR). According to the predefined endpoints, CCTA ​+ ​Stress-CTP group showed high rate of all cardiac events and low rate of hard cardiac events, respectively. The cumulative costs were 1970 ​± ​2506 Euro and 733 ​± ​1418 Euro for the CCTA ​+ ​Stress-CTP group and Stress-CMR group, respectively., Conclusions: The use of CCTA ​+ ​Stress-CTP strategy was associated with high referral to revascularization but with a favourable trend in terms of hard cardiac events and diagnostic yield in identifying individuals at lower risk of adverse events despite the presence of CAD., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) was recently validated to measure extracellular volume (ECV) in the setting of cardiac amyloidosis, showing good agreement with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). However, no evidence is available with a whole-heart single source, single energy CT scanner in the clinical context of newly diagnosed left ventricular dysfunction. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test the diagnostic accuracy of ECV CCT in patients with a recent diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy, having ECV CMR as the reference technique., Methods: 39 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed dilated cardiomyopathy (LVEF <50%) scheduled for clinically indicated CMR were prospectively enrolled. Myocardial segment evaluability assessment with each technique, agreement between ECV CMR and ECV CCT , regression analysis, Bland-Altman analysis and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were performed., Results: Mean age of enrolled patients was 62 ​± ​11 years, and mean LVEF at CMR was 35.4 ​± ​10.7%. Overall radiation exposure for ECV estimation was 2.1 ​± ​1.1 ​mSv. Out of 624 myocardial segments available for analysis, 624 (100%) segments were assessable by CCT while 608 (97.4%) were evaluable at CMR. ECV CCT demonstrated slightly lower values compared to ECV CMR (all segments, 31.8 ​± ​6.5% vs 33.9 ​± ​8.0%, p ​< ​0.001). At regression analysis, strong correlations were described (all segments, r ​= ​0.819, 95% CI: 0.791 to 0.844). On Bland-Altman analysis, bias between ECV CMR and ECV CCT for global analysis was 2.1 (95% CI: -6.8 to 11.1). ICC analysis showed both high intra-observer and inter-observer agreement for ECV CCT calculation (0.986, 95%CI: 0.983 to 0.988 and 0.966, 95%CI: 0.960 to 0.971, respectively)., Conclusions: ECV estimation with a whole-heart single source, single energy CT scanner is feasible and accurate. Integration of ECV measurement in a comprehensive CCT evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed dilated cardiomyopathy can be performed with a small increase in overall radiation exposure., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Gianluca Pontone declares the following conflict of interest: Honorarium as speaker/consultant and/or research grant from GE Healthcare, Bracco, Heartflow, Boheringher., (Copyright © 2023 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atherosclerotic plaque characterization by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) enables quantification of coronary artery disease (CAD) burden and type, which has been demonstrated as the strongest discriminant of future risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). To date, there are no clinically useful thresholds to assist with understanding a patient's disease burden and guide diagnosis and management, as there exists with coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring. The purpose of this manuscript is to establish clinically relevant plaque stages and thresholds based on evidence from invasive angiographic stenosis (ICA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) data., Methods: 303 patients underwent CCTA prior to ICA and FFR for an AHA/ACC clinical indication. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) was performed for total plaque volume (TPV, mm 3 ) and percent atheroma volume (PAV, %). We segmented atherosclerosis by composition for low-density non-calcified plaque (LD-NCP), non-calcified plaque (NCP), and calcified plaque (CP). ICAs were evaluated by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) for all coronary segments for % diameter stenosis. The relationship of atherosclerotic plaque burden and composition by QCT to ICA stenosis extent and severity by QCA and presence of ischemia by FFR was assessed to develop 4 distinct disease stages., Results: The mean age of the patients was 64.4 ​± ​10.2 years; 71% male. At the 50% QCA stenosis threshold, QCT revealed a mean PAV of 9.7 (±8.2)% and TPV of 436 (±444.9)mm 3 for those with non-obstructive CAD; PAV of 11.7 (±8.0)% and TPV of 549.3 (±408.3) mm 3 for 1 vessel disease (1VD), PAV of 17.8 (±9.8)% and TPV of 838.9 (±550.7) mm 3 for 2VD, and PAV of 19.2 (±8.2)% and TPV of 799.9 (±357.4) mm 3 for 3VD/left main disease (LMD). Non-ischemic patients (FFR >0.8) had a mean PAV of 9.2 (±7.3) % and TPV of 422.9 (±387.9 ​mm 3 ) while patients with at least one vessel ischemia (FFR ≤0.8) had a PAV of 15.2 (±9.5)% and TPV of 694.6 (±485.1). Definition of plaque stage thresholds of 0, 250, 750 ​mm 3 and 0, 5, and 15% PAV resulted in 4 clinically distinct stages in which patients with no, nonobstructive, single VD and multi-vessel disease were optimally distributed., Conclusion: Atherosclerotic plaque burden by QCT is related to stenosis severity and extent as well as ischemia. We propose staging of CAD atherosclerotic plaque burden using the following definitions: Stage 0 (Normal, 0% PAV, 0 ​mm 3 TPV), Stage 1 (Mild, >0-5% PAV or >0-250 ​mm 3 TPV), Stage 2 (Moderate, >5-15% PAV or >250-750 ​mm 3 TPV) and Stage 3 (Severe, >15% PAV or >750 mm3 TPV)., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest JKM, TC, JPE are employees and retain equity interest in Cleerly., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Aim of the present study was to verify the feasibility and accuracy of live integration of myocardial fibrosis evaluated at CCT with EAM (electro-anatomical mapping)., Methods: We prospectively enrolled a consecutive cohort of patients with clinical indication to EAM before radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) and an absolute contraindication to cardiac magnetic resonance. All patients underwent per protocol CCT for myocardial fibrosis and coronary anatomy evaluation. Diagnostic performance was assessed for myocardial fibrosis evaluation with CCT vs EAM. Live integration feasibility of CCT vs EAM was evaluated for every patients., Results: A total of 19 patients were included in the present study with 323 myocardial segments analyzed for myocardial fibrosis at CCT. In all patients CCT data were successfully integrated with EAM during RFCA procedure. All patients had myocardial fibrosis correctly identified at CCT vs EAM on a per-patients basis. A diagnostic accuracy on a per-segment basis of 94.1% for detection of any type of myocardial fibrosis at CCT vs EAM was recorded., Conclusions: CCT identification of myocardial fibrosis is feasible and accurate vs EAM in a very selected high risk patients with clinical indication to RFCA of VT and contraindication to CMR., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest P.G.D.I is employed by Biosense Webster, Johnson & Johnson Medical S.p.A, Italy. C.T. received honoraria from Abbott and Biosense Webster and serves as member of the advisory board for Medtronic and Boston Scientific Corp. All other authors declared no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In the last 20 years coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) gained a pivotal role in the evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) as finally recognized by the ESC guidelines on stable CAD. Technological advances have progressively improved the temporal resolution of CT scanners, contemporary reducing acquisition time, radiation dose and contrast volume needed for the whole heart volume acquisition, further expanding the role of cardiac CT beyond coronary anatomy evaluation. Aim of the present review is to discuss use and benefit of cardiac CT for the planning and preparation of VT ablation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No conflict of interest to be declared., (Copyright © 2021 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a rapid worldwide pandemic. While COVID-19 primarily manifests as an interstitial pneumonia and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, severe involvement of other organs has been documented. In this article, we will review the role of non-contrast chest computed tomography in the diagnosis, follow-up and prognosis of patients affected by COVID-19 pneumonia with a detailed description of the imaging findings that may be encountered. Given that patients with COVID-19 may also suffer from coagulopathy, we will discuss the role of CT pulmonary angiography in the detection of acute pulmonary embolism. Finally, we will describe more advanced applications of CT in the differential diagnosis of myocardial injury with an emphasis on ruling out acute coronary syndrome and myocarditis., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is an accurate non-invasive tool for the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). However, inability to sustain a long breath-hold, high heart rate (HR) and atrial fibrillation may affect image quality. Moreover, radiation exposure is still a matter of some concern. A scanner combining 0.23-mm spatial resolution, new iterative reconstruction and fast gantry rotation time has been recently introduced in the clinical field. The aims of our study were to evaluate interpretability, radiation exposure and diagnostic accuracy of CCTA performed with the latest generation of cardiac-CT scanners compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in the assessment of bypass grafts, and non-grafted and post-anastomotic native coronary arteries., Methods and Results: We prospectively enrolled 300 patients undergoing clinically indicated CCTA with a 16-cm z-axis coverage, 256-detector rows, and 0.28-sec gantry rotation time scanner. Coronary artery and graft interpretability, image quality and effective dose (ED) were assessed in all patients and diagnostic accuracy was evaluated in a subgroup of 100 patients who underwent ICA. Mean HR during the scan was 69.6 ± 10.8. Sinus rhythm was present in 118 patients with HR < 75 bpm and in 112 patients with HR ≥ 75 bpm, while 70 patients had atrial fibrillation. CABG interpretability was 100%. Compared to ICA, CCTA was able to correctly detecting occlusions or significant stenoses of all CABG segments. Overall interpretability of native coronary segments was 95.6%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of coronary arteries were 98.3%, 97.4%, 93.1%, 99.3% and 96.5%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy in a patient based analysis was 95.2%. Mean ED was 3.14 ± 1.7 mSv., Conclusions: The novel whole-heart coverage CT scanner allows to evaluating CABG and native coronary arteries with excellent interpretability and low radiation exposure even in the presence of unfavorable heart rhythm., (Copyright © 2020 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recent studies demonstrated a significant improvement in the diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for the evaluation of in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, coronary stent assessment is still challenging, especially because of beam-hardening artifacts due to metallic stent struts and high atherosclerotic burden of non-stented segments. Adenosine-stress myocardial perfusion assessed by CT (CTP) recently demonstrated to be a feasible and accurate tool for evaluating the functional significance of coronary stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Yet, scarce data are available on the performance of CTP in patients with previous stent implantation., Aim of the Study: We aim to assess the diagnostic performance of CCTA alone, CTP alone and CCTA plus CTP performed with a new scanner generation using quantitative invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) as standard of reference., Methods: We will enroll 300 consecutive patients with previous stent implantation, referred for non-emergent and clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography (ICA) due to suspected ISR or progression of CAD in native coronary segments. All patients will be subjected to stress myocardial CTP and a rest CCTA. The first 150 subjects will undergo static CTP scan, while the following 150 patients will undergo dynamic CTP scan. Measurement of invasive FFR will be performed during ICA when clinically indicated., Results: The primary study end points will be: 1) assessment of the diagnostic performance (diagnostic rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy) of CCTA, CTP, combined CCTA-CTP and concordant CCTA-CTP vs. ICA as standard of reference in a territory-based and patient-based analysis; 2) assessment of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of CCTA, CTP, combined CCTA-CTP and concordant CCTA-CTP vs. invasive FFR as standard of reference in a territory-based analysis., Conclusions: The ADVANTAGE study aims to provide an answer to the intriguing question whether the combined anatomical and functional assessment with CCTA plus CTP may have higher diagnostic performance as compared to CCTA alone in identifying stented patients with significant ISR or CAD progression., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Coronary CT angiography (CTA) is gaining widespread acceptance for the non-invasive evaluation of coronary arteries. However, radiation exposure and administration of iodinated contrast agents are still reasons of some concern. The 80 kV tube voltage increases the attenuation of iodine, allowing to use lower iodine concentration contrast agents for coronary CTA., Objective: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of coronary CTA performed with 64-slice scanner, 80 kV tube voltage, iterative reconstruction algorithm and ultra-low concentration contrast medium to reduce iodine load and radiation dose., Methods: We enrolled 45 patients with low body weight and indication for elective invasive coronary angiography (ICA). All patients received an 80 ml bolus of Iodixanol-270 at an infusion rate of 5 mL/s and underwent coronary CTA (80 kV and 500-550 mA) with prospective ECG-triggering. Image quality score, type of artifacts, coronary CTA evaluability, diagnostic accuracy and radiation exposure were assessed., Results: Pre-test probability of CAD was low-to-intermediate (48%). Accordingly, the prevalence of obstructive CAD was 47% (21 out of 45 patients). Most (93%) of the patients were pre-treated with intravenous metoprolol before scanning and achieved a heart rate suitable for prospective ECG-triggering coronary CTA (53 ± 3 bpm). The mean effective dose and iodine load were 1.1 ± 0.4 mSv and 21.6 gI, respectively. We rated 443 out of 720 coronary segments as being of excellent image quality. In a segment-based model, coronary evaluability (number of coronary segments evaluable/total number of coronary segments), was 97% (699/720 segments). In a segment-based analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for >50% coronary stenosis identification vs. ICA were 89%, 99%, 89%, 99% and 99%, respectively. In a patient-based analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 94%, 89%, 83%, 96% and 91%, respectively., Conclusions: In patients with low body weight, image quality and diagnostic accuracy of ultra-low radiation dose and low-iodine load coronary CTA are good and similar to values reported in the literature for standard tube voltage and iodine load protocols., (Copyright © 2016 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Non-invasive stress tests are commonly used as gatekeepers to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). New computed tomography angiography (CTA) techniques such as fractional flow reserve calculated by CTA (FFRCT) and stress myocardial computed tomography perfusion (CTP) have emerged as potential strategies to combine anatomical and functional evaluation of CAD in one technique. The aim of this study is to compare per-vessel diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT versus stress myocardial CTP for the detection of functionally significant coronary artery disease (CAD), using invasive FFR as the reference standard., Methods: Subjects with suspected CAD due to chest pain who have no contra-indications to FFRCT or stress myocardial CTP and who are referred for non-emergent, clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography (ICA), will be enrolled. A total of 300 subjects will be enrolled within 24 months., Results: The primary study endpoint will be the comparison of per-vessel diagnostic accuracy of CTA versus FFRCT versus stress myocardial CTP for the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant stenosis as defined by invasive FFR ≤0.80., Conclusions: In the PERFECTION study, the comparison between FFRCT and stress myocardial CTP will provide understanding about which technology is more accurate for the diagnosis of functionally significant CAD., (Copyright © 2016 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)