Search

Background: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is characterized by ST-segment elevation in the right precordial leads, which is not explained by ischemia, electrolyte disturbances, or obvious structural heart disease., Aim: In present study, we aim to evaluate presentation, long-term outcome, genetic findings, and therapeutic interventions in patients with BrS., Methods: Between September 2001 and June 2022, all consecutive patients with diagnosis of BrS were enrolled in the present study. All patients gave written informed consent for the procedure, and the local ethical committee approved the study., Results: Of the 76 cases, 79% were proband and 21% were detected during screening after diagnosis of BrS in a family member. Thirty-three (43%) patients had a typical spontaneous electrocardiogram (ECG) pattern. Thirty percent of the patients were symptomatic; symptomatic patients were more likely to have spontaneous type 1 Brugada ECG pattern in their ECGs (p = .01), longer PR interval (p = .03), and SCN5A mutation (p = .01) than asymptomatic patients. The mean PR interval was considerably longer in men than women (p = .034). SCN5A mutation was found in 9 out of 50 (18%) studied patients. Fifteen percent received appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy and inappropriate ICD interventions were observed in 17%. Presentation with aborted SCD or arrhythmic syncope was the only predictor of adverse outcome in follow-up (odds ratio: 3.1, 95% confidence interval: 0.7-19.6, p = .001)., Conclusions: Symptomatic patients with BrS are more likely to present with spontaneous type 1 Brugada ECG pattern, longer PR interval, and pathogenic mutation in SCN5A gene. Appropriate ICD interventions are more likely in symptomatic patients and those with SCN5A mutation., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Most patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) are first diagnosed in their 40s, with sudden cardiac death (SCD) often occurring in their 50s. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) may occur in some patients with BrS despite having been asymptomatic for a long period. This study aimed to assess the incidence and risk factors for late life-threatening arrhythmias in patients with BrS., Methods: Patients with BrS (n = 523; mean age, 51 ± 13 years; male, n = 497) were enrolled. The risk of late life-threatening arrhythmia was investigated in 225 patients who had experienced no cardiac events (CEs: SCD or ventricular tachyarrhythmia) for at least 10 years after study enrollment. The incidence of CEs during the follow-up period was examined., Results: During the follow-up of the 523 patients, 59 (11%) experienced CEs. The annual incidences of CEs were 2.87%, 0.77%, and 0.09% from study enrollment to 3, 3-10, and after 10 years, respectively. Among 225 patients who had experienced no CEs for at least 10 years after enrollment, four patients (1.8%) subsequently experienced CEs. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant differences in the incidence of late CEs between patients with and without a history of symptoms (p = .032). The positive and negative predictive values of late CEs for the programmed electrical stimulation (PES) test were 2.9% and 100%, respectively., Conclusion: Our results suggest that patients with BrS who are asymptomatic and have no ventricular tachycardia/VF inducibility by PES are at extremely low risk of experiencing late life-threatening arrhythmias., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: The Mt. FUJI multicenter trial demonstrated that a delivery catheter system had a higher rate of successful right ventricular (RV) lead deployment on the RV septum (RVS) than a conventional stylet system. In this subanalysis of the Mt. FUJI trial, we assessed the differences in electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters during RV pacing between a delivery catheter system and a stylet system and their associations with the lead tip positions., Methods: Among 70 patients enrolled in the Mt FUJI trial, ECG parameters, RV lead tip positions, and lead depth inside the septum assessed by computed tomography were compared between the catheter group (n = 36) and stylet group (n = 34)., Results: The paced QRS duration (QRS-d), corrected paced QT (QTc), and JT interval (JTc) were significantly shorter in the catheter group than in the stylet group (QRS-d: 130 ± 19 vs. 142 ± 15 ms, p = .004; QTc: 476 ± 25 vs. 514 ± 20 ms, p < .001; JTc: 347 ± 24 vs. 372 ± 17 ms, p < .001). This superiority of the catheter group was maintained in a subgroup analysis of patients with an RV lead tip position at the septum. The lead depth inside the septum was greater in the catheter group than in the stylet group, and there was a significant negative correlation between the paced QRS-d and the lead depth., Conclusion: Using a delivery catheter system carries more physiological depolarization and repolarization during RVS pacing and deeper screw penetration in the septum in comparison to conventional stylet system. The lead depth could have a more impact on the ECG parameters rather than the type of pacing lead., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Implant procedure features and clinical implications of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) have not been yet fully described. We sought to compare two different left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) implant strategies: the first one accepting LVSP as a procedural endpoint and the second one aiming at achieving LBBP in every patient in spite of evidence of previous LVSP criteria., Methods: LVSP was accepted as a procedural endpoint in 162 consecutive patients (LVSP strategy group). In a second phase, LBBP was attempted in every patient in spite of achieving previous LVSP criteria (n = 161, LBBP strategy group). Baseline patient characteristics, implant procedure, and follow-up data were compared., Results: The final capture pattern was LBBP in 71.4% and LVSP in 24.2% in the LBBP strategy group compared to 42.7% and 50%, respectively, in the LVSP strategy group. One hundred and eighty-four patients (57%) had proven LBB capture criteria with a significantly shorter paced QRS duration than the 120 patients (37%) with LVSP criteria (115 ± 9 vs. 121 ± 13 ms, p < .001). Implant parameters were comparable between the two strategies but the LBBP strategy resulted in a higher rate of acute septal perforation (11.8% vs. 4.9%, p = .026) without any clinical sequelae. Patients with CRT indications significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during follow-up irrespective of the capture pattern (from 35 ± 11% to 45 ± 14% in proven LBBP, p = .024; and from 39 ± 13% to 47 ± 12% for LVSP, p = .003). The presence of structural heart disease and baseline LBBB independently predicted unsuccessful LBB capture., Conclusion: The LBBP strategy was associated with comparable implant parameters than the LVSP strategy but resulted in higher rates of septal perforation. Proven LBB capture and LVSP showed comparable effects on LVEF during follow-up., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background and Aims: Ablation of anteroseptal accessory pathways (AS-AP) is challenging, with lower success and more complications compared to other APs. AS-APs can be successfully ablated from the right atrium (RA) or the aortic valve's noncoronary cusp (NCC). We report two patients who required a hybrid ablation approach to achieve successful abolition of both anterograde and retrograde AS-AP conduction., Methods and Results: A 21-year-old female with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and pre-excitation on electrocardiogram (ECG) underwent electrophysiology study (EPS) confirming an AS-AP with anterograde and retrograde conduction. Ablation in the NCC achieved immediate and persistent anterograde conduction block. Electrophysiological maneuvers showed persistent retrograde AP conduction and orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) remained easily inducible. Additional ablation in the NCC did not eliminate retrograde conduction. Further ablation in the RA opposite the NCC at the site of earliest retrograde atrial activation during ORT restored sinus and eliminated retrograde AP conduction. A 52-year-old male with SVT and ECG with pre-excitation underwent EPS that confirmed an AS-AP with anterograde and retrograde conduction. Ablation was performed in the NCC resulting in immediate elimination of pre-excitation. Retrograde conduction was still present and confirmed by repeating electrophysiological maneuvers. Ablation was performed in the RA opposite the successful ablation site in the NCC, eliminating retrograde AP conduction., Conclusion: Two cases of AS-AP with anterograde and retrograde conduction and successful elimination of pathway conduction required a hybrid ablation approach from the NCC and RA. This approach may be helpful in other cases to improve success rates without using excessive ablation near the normal conduction system., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Left bundle branch pacing has gained significant momentum in the last few years. The procedure involves deploying the lead deep inside the interventricular septum through left subclavian vein. We aimed at analyzing the feasibility, efficacy and long-term outcome of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) using lumen-less lead through the right subclavian vein., Methods: This was a retrospective-institutional, single center observational study done in consecutive patients who underwent LBBP using 3830 selectsecure tm lead. Left subclavian venous access was the primary strategy for lead implantation. Patients requiring right sided approach due to venous obstruction or persistent left superior-vena-cava (PLSVC) for LBBP were included in the study., Results: Right sided approach was successful in 16 out of 19 (84%) attempted patients. C315-His catheter was used in all patients without modifying its curvature. PLSVC (n = 7), left venous obstruction (n = 7), right sided device upgradation (n = 1) and left pocket infection (n = 1) were the reasons for right sided approach. Mean follow-up duration was 17 ± 12 months. LBBP resulted in reduction in QRS duration from 137.3 ± 37.8 ms to 122.3 ± 9.5 ms (p -.13) and increase in LV ejection fraction from 46.2 ± 16.3% to 54.4 ± 11.6% (p -.11). The mean fluoroscopy duration and radiation dose were significantly high in right sided approach (n = 16) as compared to left sided approach (n = 293). In patients requiring cardiac-resynchronization therapy (CRT), right sided LBBP resulted in reduction in QRS duration from 171.8 ± 18.5 to 125.5 ± 11.9 ms (p -.0001) and increase in LVEF from 29.1 ± 3.8 to 45.1 ± 11.9% (p -.005)., Conclusion: Right sided LBBP is feasible, safe and effective in patients requiring pacing for symptomatic bradyarrhythmia and CRT. Further development in dedicated tools for right-sided approach would help in reducing the fluoroscopy-duration and radiation-dose., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BiV-CRT) is ineffective in approximately one-third of patients. CRT with Conduction system pacing (CSP-CRT) may achieve greater synchronization. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of CRT with His pacing (His-CRT) or left bundle branch pacing (LBB-CRT) in lieu of biventricular CRT., Methods and Results: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched until August 19, 2023, for original studies including patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who received His- or LBB-CRT, that reported either CSP-CRT success, LVEF, QRS duration (QRSd), or New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification. Effect measures were compared with frequentist network meta-analysis. Thirty-seven publications, including 20 comparative studies, were included. Success rates were 73.5% (95% CI: 61.2-83.0) for His-CRT and 91.5% (95% CI: 88.0-94.1) for LBB-CRT. Compared to BiV-CRT, greater improvements were observed for LVEF (mean difference [MD] for His-CRT +3.4%; 95% CI [1.0; 5.7], and LBB-CRT: +4.4%; [2.5; 6.2]), LV end-systolic volume (His-CRT:17.2mL [29.7; 4.8]; LBB-CRT:15.3mL [28.3; 2.2]), QRSd (His-CRT: -17.1ms [-25.0; -9.2]; LBB-CRT: -17.4ms [-23.2; -11.6]), and NYHA (Standardized MD [SMD]: His-CRT:0.4 [0.8; 0.1]; LBB-CRT:0.4 [-0.7; -0.2]). Pacing thresholds at baseline and follow-up were significantly lower with LBB-CRT versus both His-CRT and BiV-CRT. CSP-CRT was associated with reduced mortality (R = 0.75 [0.61-0.91]) and hospitalizations risk (RR = 0.63 [0.42-0.96])., Conclusion: This study found that CSP-CRT is associated with greater improvements in QRSd, echocardiographic, and clinical response. LBB-CRT was associated with lower pacing thresholds. Future randomized trials are needed to determine CSP-CRT efficacy., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Measurement of the spatial ventricular gradient (SVG), spatial QRST angles, and other vectorcardiographic measures of myocardial electrical heterogeneity have emerged as novel risk stratification methods for sudden cardiac death and other adverse cardiovascular events. Prior studies of normal limits of these measurements included primarily young, healthy, White volunteers, but normal limits in older patients are unknown. The influence of race and body mass index (BMI) on these measurements is also unclear., Methods: Normal 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) from a single center were identified. Patients with abnormal cardiovascular, pulmonary, or renal history (assessed by International Classification of Disease [ICD-9/ICD-10] codes) or abnormal cardiovascular imaging were excluded. The SVG and QRST angles were measured and stratified by age, sex, and race. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess the influence of age, BMI, and heart rate (HR) on these measurements., Results: Among 3292 patients, observed ranges of SVG and QRST angles (peak and mean) differed significantly based on sex, age, and race. Sex differences attenuated with increasing age. Men tended to have larger SVG magnitude (60.4 [46.1-77.8] vs. 52.5 [41.3-65.8] mv*ms, p < .0001) and elevation, and more anterior/negative SVG azimuth (-14.8 [-25.1 to -4.3] vs. 1.3 [-9.8 to 10.5] deg, p < .0001) compared to women. Men also had wider QRST angles. Observed ranges varied significantly with BMI and HR. SVG and QRST angle measurements were robust to different filtering bandwidths and moderate fiducial point annotation errors, but were heavily affected by changes in baseline correction., Conclusions: Age, sex, race, BMI, and HR significantly affect the range of SVG and QRST angles in patients with normal ECGs and no known cardiovascular disease, and should be accounted for in future studies. An online calculator for prediction of these "normal limits" given demographics is provided at https://bivectors.github.io/gehcalc/., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) involves the deployment of the lead deep inside the septum. Penetration of the septum by the lead depends on the texture of the septum, rapidity of rotations, operator experience, and implantation tools., Objectives: The aim of our study was to assess the behavior of the lumenless lead during rapid rotations and the physiological property of the interventricular septum(IVS) during LBBP., Methods: Patients undergoing LBBP between January 2021 and December 2022 were retrospectively included in the study., Results: Among 255 attempted patients, 20 (7.9%) had procedural failure(no LBB capture-four, inability to penetrate septum-seven, and dislodgements after sheath removal-nine). Septal penetration achieved in 248/255 patients (97.2%). Lead movement inside the IVS was assessed by lead traverse time. Based on the behavior of the IVS (n = 255), three different responses were noted. Type-I response(normal/firm septum) in 93.7% (n = 239) characterized by constant and progressive movement of lead. Neither perforation nor further change in premature-ventricular-complex morphology beyond M-beat were observed despite additional few unintentional rotations indicating the protective mechanism of LV-endocardium. Type-II response(soft/cheesy septum) in 3.5% (n = 9) characterized by hyper-movement of lead without resistance due to altered texture of septum and poor LV subendocardial barrier resulting in perforation. No patients in this group had LV dysfunction or associated coronary artery disease. In type-III response, seen in 2.8% (n = 7), lead could not be penetrated due to scar in IVS., Conclusion: Three different patterns of responses were observed during LBBP. The most distinct type-ll response was associated with soft/cheesy septum with hyper-movement of the lead predisposing for future dislodgments in patients without structural heart disease., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: In patients receiving conduction system pacing (CSP), it is not well established how to program the sensed atrioventricular delay (sAVD), with respect to the type of capture obtained (selective, nonselective His-bundle [HB] capture or left bundle branch [LBB] capture). The aim of this study was to acutely assess the effectiveness of an electrophysiology (EP)-guided method for sAVD optimization by comparing it with the echocardiogram-guided optimization., Methods and Results: Consecutive patients undergoing HB or LBB pacing were enrolled. The EP-guided sAVD was defined as the sAVD leading to a PR interval of 150 ms on surface electrocardiogram (ECG). In HB pacing patients, EP-guided sAVD was obtained subtracting the time from the onset of the P wave on ECG to the local atrial electrogram (EGM) recorded by the atrial lead (right atrial sensing latency, RASL) and the His-ventricular interval from 150 ms; in LBB pacing patients, subtracting RASL from 150 ms. Transmitral flow assessment by pulsed wave Doppler was used to find the echo-optimized sAVD by a modified iterative method. The discordance between the EP-guided and the echo-optimized sAVD was recorded., Results: Seventy-one patients were enrolled: 12 with selective, 32 nonselective HB capture, and 27 LBB capture. Overall, the rate of concordance between the EP-guided and the echo-optimized sAVD was 71.8%, with no significant differences between the three groups., Conclusion: In CSP patients, an optimal sAVD can be programmed, in more than 70% of cases, considering only simple EGM intervals to obtain a physiological PR interval on surface ECG., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) commonly originate from the left ventricular summit (LVS) and results in left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in some patients; however, factors related to LV cardiomyopathy have not been well elucidated. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the risk factors for LV cardiomyopathy and the outcomes of patients with LVS VA., Methods: Between 2013 and 2018, a total of 139 patients (60.7% men; mean age 53.2 ± 13.9 years old) underwent catheter ablation for LVS VA in two centers. Detailed patient demographics, electrocardiograms, electrophysiological characteristics, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. LV cardiomyopathy was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%., Results: Acute procedural success was achieved in 92.8% of patients. There were 40 patients (28.8%) with LV cardiomyopathy, and the mean LVEF improved from 37.5 ± 9.3% to 48.5 ± 10.2% after ablation (p < .001). After multivariate analysis, the independent factors of LV dysfunction were wider QRS duration (QRSd) of the VA (odds ratio [OR] 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.04; p = .046) and the absolute earliest activation time discrepancy (AEAD) between epicardium and endocardium (OR 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00-1.09; p = .048). After ablation, the LV function was completely recovered in 20 patients (50%). The factors for LV dysfunction without recovery included wider premature ventricular complex (PVC) QRSd (OR 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02-1.17; p = .012) and poorer LVEF (OR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.74-0.97; p = .020)., Conclusion: In patients with VA from the LVS, PVC QRSd and AEAD are factors associated with deteriorating LV systolic function. Catheter ablation can reverse LV remodeling. Narrower QRSd and better LVEF are associated with better recovery of LV function after ablation., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background and Objective: Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has shown the benefits in the treatment of dyssynchronous heart failure (HF). The purpose of this study was to develop a novel approach for LBBP and left bundle branch block (LBBB) in a canine model., Methods: A "triangle-center" method by tricuspid valve annulus angiography for LBBP implantation was performed in 6 canines. A catheter was then applied for retrograde His potential recording and left bundle branch (LBB) ablation simultaneously. The conduction system was stained to verify the "triangle-center" method for LBBP and assess the locations of the LBB ablation site in relation to the left septal fascicle (LSF)., Results: The mean LBB potential to ventricular interval and stimulus-peak left ventricular activation time were 11.8 ± 1.2 and 35.7 ± 3.1 ms, respectively. The average intrinsic QRS duration was 44.7 ± 4.7 ms. LBB ablation significantly prolonged the QRS duration (106.3 ± 8.3 ms, p < .001) while LBBP significantly shortened the LBBB-QRS duration to 62.5 ± 5.3 ms (p < .001). After 6 weeks of follow-up, both paced QRS duration (63.0 ± 5.4 ms; p = .203) and LBBB-QRS duration (107.3 ± 7.4 ms; p = .144) were unchanged when comparing to the acute phase, respectively. Anatomical analysis of 6 canine hearts showed that the LBBP lead-tip was all placed in LSF area., Conclusion: The new approach for LBBP and LBBB canine model was stable and feasible to simulate the clinical dyssynchrony and resynchronization. It provided a useful tool to investigate the basic mechanisms of underlying physiological pacing benefits., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: We aimed to investigate the impact of the 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline changes in left bundle branch block (LBBB) definition on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patient selection and outcomes., Methods: The MUG (Maastricht, Utrecht, Groningen) registry, consisting of consecutive patients implanted with a CRT device between 2001 and 2015 was studied. For this study, patients with baseline sinus rhythm and QRS duration ≥ 130ms were eligible. Patients were classified according to ESC 2013 and 2021 guideline LBBB definitions and QRS duration. Endpoints were heart transplantation, LVAD implantation or mortality (HTx/LVAD/mortality) and echocardiographic response (LVESV reduction ≥15%)., Results: The analyses included 1.202, typical CRT patients. The ESC 2021 definition resulted in considerably less LBBB diagnoses compared to the 2013 definition (31.6% vs. 80.9%, respectively). Applying the 2013 definition resulted in significant separation of the Kaplan-Meier curves of HTx/LVAD/mortality (p < .0001). A significantly higher echocardiographic response rate was found in the LBBB compared to the non-LBBB group using the 2013 definition. These differences in HTx/LVAD/mortality and echocardiographic response were not found when applying the 2021 definition., Conclusion: The ESC 2021 LBBB definition leads to a considerably lower percentage of patients with baseline LBBB then the ESC 2013 definition. This does not lead to better differentiation of CRT responders, nor does this lead to a stronger association with clinical outcomes after CRT. In fact, stratification according to the 2021 definition is not associated with a difference in clinical or echocardiographic outcome, implying that the guideline changes may negatively influence CRT implantation practice with a weakened recommendation in patients that will benefit from CRT., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Conduction system pacing (CSP), in the form of His bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), is emerging as a valuable cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) delivery method. However, patient selection and therapy personalization for CSP delivery remain poorly characterized. We aim to compare pacing-induced electrical synchrony during CRT, HBP, LBBP, HBP with left ventricular (LV) epicardial lead (His-optimized CRT [HOT-CRT]), and LBBP with LV epicardial lead (LBBP-optimized CRT [LOT-CRT]) in patients with different conduction disease presentations using computational modeling., Methods: We simulated ventricular activation on 24 four-chamber heart geometries, including His-Purkinje systems with proximal left bundle branch block (LBBB). We simulated septal scar, LV lateral wall scar, and mild and severe myocardium and LV His-Purkinje system conduction disease by decreasing the conduction velocity (CV) down to 70% and 35% of the healthy CV. Electrical synchrony was measured by the shortest interval to activate 90% of the ventricles (90% of biventricular activation time [BIVAT-90])., Results: Severe LV His-Purkinje conduction disease favored CRT (BIVAT-90: HBP 101.5 ± 7.8 ms vs. CRT 93.0 ± 8.9 ms, p < .05), with additional electrical synchrony induced by HOT-CRT (87.6 ± 6.7 ms, p < .05) and LOT-CRT (73.9 ± 7.6 ms, p < .05). Patients with slow myocardium CV benefit more from CSP compared to CRT (BIVAT-90: CRT 134.5 ± 24.1 ms; HBP 97.1 ± 9.9 ms, p < .01; LBBP: 101.5 ± 10.7 ms, p < .01). Septal but not lateral wall scar made CSP ineffective, while CRT was able to resynchronize the ventricles in the presence of septal scar (BIVAT-90: baseline 119.1 ± 10.8 ms vs. CRT 85.1 ± 14.9 ms, p < .01)., Conclusion: Severe LV His-Purkinje conduction disease attenuates the benefits of CSP, with additional improvements achieved with HOT-CRT and LOT-CRT. Septal but not lateral wall scars make CSP ineffective., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBP) has emerged as an alternative method for conduction system pacing. While initial experience with delivery systems for stylet-driven and lumenless lead implantation for LBBP has been described, data comparing outcomes of stylet-driven versus lumenless lead implantation for LBBP are limited. In this study, we compare success rates and outcomes of LBBP with stylet-driven versus lumenless lead delivery systems., Methods: Eighty-three consecutive patients (mean age 74.1 ± 11.2 years; 56 [68%] male) undergoing attempted LBBP at a single institution were identified. Cases were grouped by lead delivery systems used: stylet-driven (n = 53) or lumenless (n = 30). Baseline characteristics and procedural findings were recorded and compared between the cohorts. Intermediate term follow-up data on ventricular lead parameters were also compared., Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Successful LBBP was achieved in 77% of patients, with similar success rates between groups (76% in stylet-driven, 80% in lumenless, p = 0.79), and rates of adjudicated LBB capture and other paced QRS parameters were also similar. Compared with the lumenless group, the stylet-driven group had significantly shorter procedure times (90 ± 4 vs. 112 ± 31 min, p = 0.004) and fluoroscopy times (10 ± 5 vs. 15 ± 6 min, p = 0.003). Ventricular lead parameters at follow-up were similar, and rates of procedural complications and need for lead revision were low in both groups., Conclusion: Delivery systems for stylet-driven and for lumenless leads for LBBP have comparable acute success rates. Long-term follow-up of lead performance following use of the various delivery systems is warranted., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Diagnosis of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmia (OTVA) localization by an electrocardiographic complex is key to successful catheter ablation for OTVA. However, diagnosing the origin of OTVA with a precordial transition in lead V3 (V3TZ) is challenging. This study aimed to create the best practical electrocardiogram algorithm to differentiate the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) of OTVA origin with V3TZ using machine learning., Methods: Of 498 consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for OTVA, we included 104 patients who underwent ablation for OTVA with V3TZ and identified the origin of LVOT (n = 62) and RVOT (n = 42) from the results. We analyzed the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram preoperatively and measured 128 elements in each case. The study population was randomly divided into training group (70%) and testing group (30%), and decision tree analysis was performed using the measured elements as features. The performance of the algorithm created in the training group was verified in the testing group., Results: Four measurements were identified as important features: the aVF/II R-wave ratio, the V2S/V3R index, the QRS amplitude in lead V3, and the R-wave deflection slope in lead V3. Among them, the aVF/II R-wave ratio and the V2S/V3R index had a particularly strong influence on the algorithm. The performance of this algorithm was extremely high, with an accuracy of 94.4%, precision of 91.5%, recall of 100%, and an F1-score of 0.96., Conclusions: The novel algorithm created using machine learning is useful in diagnosing the origin of OTVA with V3TZ., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Presence of scar at the implantation-site is considered as a major factor in determining the success of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP). We aimed at analyzing the predictors of procedural failure in patients with scarred-left ventricle (LV) as demonstrated by cardiac-magnetic resonance-imaging (CMR)., Methods: This was a retrospective, observational single-center-study that included consecutive cardiomyopathy patients with LV-scar as demonstrated by late-gadolinium-enhancement (LGE) in CMR requiring LBBP. Procedural-failure was defined as the inability to penetrate the septum to reach the LV subendocardium RESULTS: A total of 25 cardiomyopathy patients demonstrated LGE in CMR and were included in the study. LBBP was successful in 16 patients (group-I; 64% acute-procedural-success). In the remaining 9 patients (group-II) lead could not be penetrated and hence biventricular-pacing was done. LBBP resulted in reduction in QRS-duration and improvement in LV ejection fraction in group-I patients during a mean follow-up of 11.2 ± 3.7 months. Computed-tomography-angiography after LBBP showed the successful lead deployment site (LBBP-Zone) as the overlapping areas of inferior aspect of antero-septum and superior aspect of infero-septum (segment 2/3; AHA-model) in short-axis view(figure-1C). CMR showed LGE in significantly more number of LV-segments and high scar-burden in group-II as compared to group-I (figure-1). A total scar score value of >1.0 predicted failure with 100%-sensitivity and 75%-specificity. CMR revealed transmural-scar in the LBBP-Zone in all patients in group-II (n = 9; 100%). Transmural scar in LBBP-Zone by CMR had 100%-sensitivity and 100%-specificity for predicting the procedural-failure., Conclusion: CMR helps in predicting the procedural failure of LBBP in patients with scarred LV. Presence of transmural-LGE in the LBBP-Zone predicts failure with high sensitivity and specificity., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Despite numerous ECG algorithms being developed to localize the site of manifest accessory pathways (AP), they often require stepwise multiple-lead analysis with variable accuracy, limitations, and reproducibility. The study aimed to develop a single-lead ECG algorithm incorporating the P-Delta interval (PDI) as an adjunct criterion to discriminate between right and left manifest AP., Methods: Consecutive WPW patients undergoing electrophysiological study (EPS) were retrospectively recruited and split into a derivation and validation group (1:1 ratio). Sinus rhythm ECG analysis in lead V1 was performed by three independent investigators blinded to the EPS results. Conventional ECG parameters and PDI were assessed through the global cohort., Results: A total of 140 WPW patients were included (70 for each group). A score-based, single-lead ECG algorithm was developed through derivation analysis incorporating the PDI, R/S ratio, and QRS onset polarity in lead V1. The validation group analysis confirmed the proposed algorithm's high accuracy (95%), which was superior to the previous ones in predicting the AP side (p < 0.05). A score of ≤+1 was 96.5% accurate in predicting right AP while a score of ≥+2 was 92.5% accurate in predicting left AP. The new algorithm maintained optimal performance in specific subgroups of the global cohort showing an accuracy rate of 90%, 92%, and 96% in minimal pre-excitation, posteroseptal AP, and pediatric patients, respectively., Conclusions: A novel single-lead ECG algorithm incorporating the PDI interval with previous conventional criteria showed high accuracy in differentiating right from left manifest AP comprising pediatric and minimal pre-excitation subgroups in the current study., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is achieved by advancing the lead tip deep in the septum. Most LBBAP implants are performed using the Medtronic SelectSecure™ MRI SecureScan™ Model 3830 featuring a unique 4 Fr fixed helix lumenless design. Details of lead use conditions and long-term reliability have not been reported. This study was designed to quantify the mechanical use conditions for the 3830 lead during and after LBBAP implant, and to evaluate reliability using bench testing and simulation., Methods: Fifty bradycardia patients with implantation of the 3830 lead for LBBAP were enrolled. Use conditions of lead deployment at implantation were collected and computed tomography (CT) scans were performed at 3-month follow-up. Curvature amplitude along the pacing lead was determined with CT images. Fatigue bending was performed using accelerated testing in a more severe environment than routine clinical use conditions. Conductor fracture rate in a simulated patient population was estimated based on clinical use conditions and fatigue test results., Results: The number of attempts to place the 3830 lead for LBBAP was 2.1 ± 1.3 (range: 1-7) with 13 ± 6 lead rotations at the final attempt. Extreme implant conditions were simulated in bench testing with 5 applications of 20 turns followed by up to 400 million bending cycles. Reliability modeling predicted a 10-year fracture rate of 0.02%., Conclusions: LBBAP implants require more lead rotations than standard pacing implants and result in unique lead bending. Application of simulated LBBAP use conditions to the 3830 lead in an accelerated in-vitro model does not produce excess conductor fractures. IMAGE-LBBP Study ID of ClinicalTrial.GOV: NCT04119323., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Spatial characteristics of localized sources of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) identified by unipolar-based panoramic mapping software (CARTOFINDER) remain unclear. We evaluated spatial characteristics of bi-atrial AF localized sources in relation to complex fractionated atrial electrocardiograms (CFAEs) and atrial low voltage area (LVAs) (≤0.35 mV during AF)., Methods and Results: Twenty consecutive patients with persistent AF underwent bi-atrial voltage, CFAE, and CARTOFINDER mapping before the beginning of ablation (18 [90%] patients, initial procedure; 2 [10%] patients, repeat procedure). CFAEs were recorded using the interval confidence level (ICL) mode and defined as sites with a confidence level of ≥80% of maximal ICL number. We elucidated the following: (1) differences in the rate of AF localized sources and CFAEs inside or outside the atrial LVAs; (2) distribution of AF localized sources and CFAEs; and (3) distance between the closest points of AF localized sources and CFAEs. A total of 270 AF localized sources and 486 CFAEs were identified in 20 patients. AF localized sources were confirmed more often outside atrial LVAs than CFAEs (71% vs. 46% outside LVA, p < .001). AF localized sources and CFAEs were diffusely distributed without any tendency in bi-atria. Mean distance between closest AF localized sources and CFAEs was 22 ± 8 mm., Conclusion: AF localized sources identified by CARTOFINDER are different therapeutic targets as compared to CFAEs and could be confirmed both inside and outside atrial LVAs., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged in recent years as a new pacing modality, providing patients with a narrower paced QRS than conventional pacing and stable pacing parameters. At the same time, there is a growing concern about the use of fluoroscopy in pacemaker implantations, given its harmful effects on both patients and operators. However, there are no prior experiences of zero-fluoroscopy in LBBP procedure., Methods: We conducted an observational prospective study recruiting consecutive patients that underwent zero-fluoroscopy LBBP pacemaker implantation. A 6-month follow-up visit was programmed for every patient. The main goal of our study was to assess the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of the procedure., Results: From January 2021 to February 2022, we included 10 patients, 8 males. The average age was 63 ± 4 years. The procedure was successful in all patients. We observed a significant reduction in paced QRS width compared with basal QRS width (149 ± 31.9 vs. 116 ± 15.6 ms, p = .02). All device parameters remained stable at 6-month follow-up: no significant differences in mean impedance (700.5 ± 136.4 vs. 494 ± 72.7 Ohm, p = .09), capture threshold (0.67 ± 0.2 vs. 0.83 ± 0.2 V @ 0.4 ms, p = .27) or endocardial V-wave amplitude (10.6 ± 5.2 vs. 13.9 ± 6.3 mV, p = .19). No complications were reported in any case., Conclusion: Zero-fluoroscopy LBBP is feasible and safe, and it may be considered in cases where radiation exposure is contraindicated or especially undesirable. Future randomized clinical trials are needed for the widespread use of this new technique., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Brugada syndrome (BrS), which is characterized by J-point elevation in right precordial leads of a 12-lead electrocardiogram, is associated with the occurrence of ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, risk stratification of VF in patients with BrS remains challenging., Objective: The aim of this study was to identify a risk predictor of VF in patients with BrS using pharmacological tests., Methods: Twenty-one consecutive patients with BrS and a history of documented spontaneous VF (n = 16) or syncope presumed to be caused by lethal ventricular arrhythmia (n = 5) were enrolled. J-wave changes in response to intravenous verapamil, propranolol, and pilsicainide were separately assessed., Results: During the median follow-up period of 86.0 months, 8 patients had VF recurrence (recurrence group) and 13 patients did not have VF recurrence (non-recurrence group). Intravenous propranolol injection induced significant J-wave augmentation (i.e., increase in amplitude >0.1 mV) in the inferior and/or lateral leads in the recurrence group compared to the non-recurrence group (p = .048 and p = .015, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that VF recurrence is significantly higher in patients with BrS and J-wave augmentation due to intravenous propranolol than in patients without J-wave augmentation (p = .014)., Conclusion: The study results show that propranolol-induced J-wave augmentation is involved in the risk of VF in patients with BrS. The results suggest that early repolarization patterns in response to pharmacological tests may be useful for risk stratification of VF in patients with symptomatic BrS., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: The novel method of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has been reported to achieve better electrical and mechanical synchrony in the left ventricle than conventional right ventricular pacing (RVP). However, its effects on right ventricle (RV) performance are still unknown., Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing dual-chamber pacemaker (PM) implantation for sick sinus syndrome (SSS) with normal cardiac function and a narrow QRS complex were recruited for the study. The pacing characteristics and echocardiogram parameters were measured to evaluate RV function, interventricular and RV synchrony, and were compared between ventricular pacing-on and native-conduction modes., Results: A total of 84 patients diagnosed with SSS and an indication for pacing therapy were enrolled. Forty-two patients (50%; mean age 65.50 ± 9.30 years; 35% male) underwent successful LBBP and 42 patients (50%; mean age 69.26 ± 10.08 years; 33% male) RVSP, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. We found no significant differences in RV function [RV-FAC (Fractional Area Change)%, 47.13 ± 5.69 versus 48.60 ± 5.83, p = .069; Endo-GLS (Global Longitudinal Strain)%, -28.88 ± 4.94 versus -29.82 ± 5.35, p = .114; Myo-GLS%, -25.72 ± 4.75 versus -25.72 ± 5.21, p = .559; Free Wall St%, 27.40 ± 8.03 versus -28.71 ± 7.34, p = .304] between the native-conduction and LBBP capture modes, while the RVSP capture mode was associated with a significant reduction in the above parameters compared with the native-conduction mode (p < .0001). The interventricular synchrony in the LBBP group was also superior to the RVSP group significantly., Conclusion: LBBP is a pacing technique that seems to associate with a positive and protective impact on RV performance., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Recently, output-dependent QRS transition was reported to be required to confirm left bundle branch (LBB) capture in LBB area pacing (LBBAP) procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the achievement rate and the learning curve of LBB capture in LBBAP procedure performed with the goal of demonstrating output-dependent QRS transition, and investigate predictors of LBB capture., Methods and Results: The LBBAP procedure was performed in 126 patients with bradyarrhythmia. LBB capture was defined as a demonstration of output-dependent QRS transition. The following pacing definitions were used for evaluation: (1) LBBAP, which met the previously reported LBBAP criteria, (2) LBB pacing (LBBP), LBB capture was confirmed, and (3) available LBBP, LBB threshold was clinically usable (<3 V at 0.4 ms). The learning curve was evaluated by division into three time-periods. The achievement rates of LBBAP, LBBP, and available LBBP were 88.1%, 41.2%, and 35.7%, respectively. The achievement rates of all three pacing definitions significantly increased with experience (p < .01), but the achievement rate of available LBBP was still 50% in the third period. As predictors of LBB capture, the interval between LBB-Purkinje potential and QRS onset ≥22 ms had high specificity of 98.3%, while R wave peak time in V6 < 68 ms had insufficient sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 68%., Conclusion: Even if LBB capture was aimed in LBBAP procedure, it was not easy to achieve, and there was a clear learning curve. Much of LBBAP may be left ventricular septal pacing that does not capture LBB., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has recently been reported to be a new, clinically feasible and safe physiological pacing strategy. The present study aims to investigate the usefulness of LBBAP in reducing mechanical dyssynchrony compared with right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP)., Methods and Results: A total of 39 LBBAP patients, 42 RVSP patients, and 93 healthy control participants were retrospectively evaluated. We compared phase analysis- (bandwidth, phase standard deviation [PSD], entropy) and regional wall motion analysis parameters. Wall motion analysis parameters included the time to the end-systolic frame (TES) assessed using single-photon emission computed tomography analysis. The maximum differences between segmental TES (MDTES), the standard deviation of TES (SDTES), and the TES difference between the lateral and septal segments (DTES-LS) were obtained. All phase analysis parameters were significantly smaller in the LBBAP group than in the RVSP group (bandwidth: LBBAP, 74 ± 31° vs. RVSP, 102 ± 59°, p = .009; PSD: LBBAP, 19 ± 6.7° vs. RVSP, 26 ± 15°, p = .007; entropy: LBBAP, 0.57 ± 0.07 vs. RVSP, 0.62 ± 0.11 p = .009). The regional wall motion analysis parameters were also smaller in the LBBAP group than in the RVSP group (MDTES:LBBAP, 17 ± 7.1% vs. RVSP, 25 ± 14%, p = .004; SDTES:LBBAP, 4.5 ± 1.7% vs. RVSP, 6.0 ± 3.5%, p = .015; DTES-LS: LBBAP, 4.1 ± 3.4% vs. RVSP, 7.1 ± 5.4%, p = .004). All phase analysis and wall motion analysis parameters were same in the LBBAP and control groups., Conclusion: LBBAP may reduce mechanical dyssynchrony and achieve greater physiological ventricular activation than RVSP., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Premature-ventricular-complexes (template/fixation beat) guided left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) was recently described as a novel method of successful lead deployment by rapid rotations., Methods: We aimed at analyzing the incidence of a unique morphology template beat, which we labelled as 'M-beat' in patients undergoing PVC-guided LBBP, its ability to predict selective LBB-capture and clinical significance., Results: Overall 210 out of 217 attempted-patients (96.7%) underwent successful LBBP. Template beat was noted in 90.4% patients (n = 190) and M-beat in 32.8%(n = 69). Non-selective to selective capture transition demonstrated in 55.2%(n = 116). The QRS duration of the M-beat was 129.3 ± 13.1ms. Patients were divided into two groups: Group-I with M-beat (n = 69;32.8%) and Group-II without M-beat (n = 141; 67.2%). The mean fluoroscopy-time was significantly less in group-I as compared to group-II (13.1 ± 11.1 vs 16.8 ± 12.04 minutes; p-0.03). Patients in group-II required more attempts as compared to group-I for successful lead deployment (2.8 ± 1.09 vs 2.2 ± 1.04; p - 0.01). Six patients showed loss of R-wave in lead-V1 and 2 showed rise in LBB capture threshold by >1V during follow-up in group-II. M-beat had a specificity of 96.77% and sensitivity of 58.62% (positive-predictive-value-98.55%) to predict selective-LBB capture. Myocardial excitability would not modify the occurrence of M-beat as opposed to capture transition response since it could be demonstrated without pacing protocols. When confirmation of LBB-capture itself would be difficult in patients with baseline LBBB-morphology, M-beat with 42.8% incidence predicted selective capture with 96.7% specificity and 66.04% sensitivity(positive-predictive-value-97.22%)., Conclusion: M-beat is a marker of transient-selective LBB-capture, independent of the local myocardial excitability with high specificity and positive predictive value irrespective of the baseline QRS morphology., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Early detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) is desirable but challenging due to the often-asymptomatic nature of AF. Known screening methods are limited and most of them depend of electrocardiography or other techniques with direct contact with the skin. Analysis of voice signals from natural speech has been reported for several applications in medicine. The study goal was to evaluate the usefulness of vocal features analysis for the detection of AF., Methods: This prospective study was performed in two medical centers. Patients with persistent AF admitted for cardioversion were enrolled. The patients pronounced the vowels "Ahh" and "Ohh" were recorded synchronously with an ECG tracing. An algorithm was developed to provide an "AF indicator" for detection of AF from the speech signal., Results: A total of 158 patients were recruited. The final analysis of "Ahh" and "Ohh" syllables was performed on 143 and 142 patients, respectively. The mean age was 71.4 ± 9.3 and 43% of patients were females. The developed AF indicator was reliable. Its numerical value decreased significantly in sinus rhythm (SR) after the cardioversion ("Ahh": from 13.98 ± 3.10 to 7.49 ± 1.58; "Ohh": from 11.39 ± 2.99 to 2.99 ± 1.61). The values at SR were significantly more homogenous compared to AF as indicated by a lower standard deviation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was >0.98 and >0.89 ("Ahh" and "Ohh," respectively, p < .001). The AF indicator sensitivity is 95% with 82% specificity., Conclusion: This study is the first report to demonstrate feasibility and reliability of the identification of AF episodes using voice analysis with acceptable accuracy, within the identified limitations of our study methods. The developed AF indicator has higher accuracy using the "Ahh" syllable versus "Ohh.", (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Pacing leads with extendable-retractable helix (EHL) are alternatives to fixed-helix leads (FHL) for conduction system pacing (CSP), but data on handling characteristics are limited. This study evaluated a dual-center experience of lead handling and performance during CSP., Methods and Results: Consecutive patients with His-bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) were evaluated for the primary outcome of lead failure, defined as structural damage to the lead necessitating lead replacement. Differences in pacing characteristics were compared. Among 280 patients (mean age 74 ± 11 years, 44% male, 50% LBBP), 246 (88%) received FHL and 34 (12%) received EHL. Of 299 leads used, lead failure occurred more frequently among patients with EHL than FHL (29% vs. 2%, p < .001), regardless of CSP modality. Majority of damaged leads (89%) in the form of helix deformation were successfully removed, with failure occurring in only two patients, both EHL, leading to helix fracture and retention within the septal myocardium. EHL, compared to FHL, was associated with 25-fold increased odds of lead failure (odds ratio: 25.21, 95% confidence interval: 7.35-86.51), and persisted after adjustment in turn for age, pacing modality and indication. CSP implant success rates did not differ by lead design (FHL 80% vs. EHL 71%, p = .18), with similar pacing thresholds at implant and follow-up., Conclusion: Helix deformation and fracture were more frequent with EHL in CSP despite similar implant success. These findings have significant implications for lead selection during CSP and raises concerns about the long-term extractability of EHL in CSP., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a form of conduction system pacing. Long-term data on the safety and performance of LBBAP 1 year postdevice implantation has not been well described., Methods and Results: Sixty-five patients (49% females) who received LBBAP for bradycardia indications using the SelectSecure 3830 lead (Medtronic) were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical variables were examined. Lead parameters were obtained at implant and during regular follow-up. Mean age of patients was 75.7 ± 10.1 years with left ventricular ejection fraction 59.8 ± 10.4%. Indications for pacing were atrioventricular block 55%, sinus node dysfunction 19%, tachy-brady syndrome 15%, atrioventricular node ablation 8%, and bail out cardiac resynchronization therapy 3%. Mean baseline QRS measured 120 ± 38 ms, paced QRS duration was 138 ± 22ms. Paced QRS narrowed by 24 ms in those with pre-existing left bundle branch block (BBB), increased by 1 ms in those with pre-existing right BBB, and increased by 42 ms in those with no BBB. LBBAP threshold at implant was 0.521 ± 0.153 V at 0.4 ms, and increased to 0.654 ± 0.186 V at 3 months (+26%), 0.707 ± 0.186 V at 6 months (+36%), and 0.772 ± 0.220 V at 12 months (+48%). Patients with left BBB showed the maximum benefit with QRS narrowing 24 ms. Pacing impedance remained unchanged with no procedure-related complications., Conclusion: LBBAP is a durable form of conduction system pacing with pacing thresholds remaining relatively stable over 12 months post device implantation. Patients with left BBB display the narrowest paced QRS., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel physiological pacing modality. The relationship between the pacing lead tip location and paced electrocardiographic (ECG) characteristics remains unclear. The objectives are to determine the lead tip location within the interventricular septum (IVS) and assess the location-based ECG QRS duration (QRSd) and left ventricular activation time (LVAT)., Methods: This multicenter study enrolled 50 consecutive bradycardia patients who met pacemaker therapy guidelines and received LBBAP implantation via the trans-ventricular septal approach. After at least 3 months postimplant, 12-lead ECGs and pacing parameters were obtained. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) imaging was performed to assess the LBBAP lead tip distance from the LV blood pool., Results: Among the 50 patients, analyzable CT images were obtained in 42. In 23 of the 42 patients, the lead tips were within 2 mm to the LV blood pool (the LV subendocardial (LVSE) group), 13 between 2 and 4 mm (the Near-LVSE group), and the remaining 6 beyond 4 mm (the Mid-LV septal (Mid-LVS) group). No significant differences in paced QRSd were found among the three groups (LVSE, 107 ± 15 ms; Near-LVSE, 106 ± 13 ms; Mid-LVS, 104 ± 15 ms; p = .87). LVAT in the LVSE (64 ± 7 ms) was significantly shorter than in the Mid-LVS (72 ± 8 ms; p < .05), but not significantly different from that in the Near-LVSE (69 ± 8 ms; p > .05)., Conclusion: In routine LBBAP practice, paced narrow QRSd and fast LVAT, indicative of physiological pacing, were consistently achieved for lead tip location in the LV subendocardial or near LV subendocardial region., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a new near-physiological pacing modality. Distinguishing left ventricular septal only pacing (LVSP) from nonselective LBBP still needs clarification. This prospective study sought to establish a differentiation algorithm to confirm LBBP., Methods and Results: LBBP was attempted in consecutive patients. If direct LBB capture (LBBP) could not be confirmed, LVSP was considered to have been achieved. Intracardiac left ventricular (LV) activation sequence and activation time were analyzed using coronary sinus (CS) electrogram mapping. Electrophysiological parameters including S-CSmax, S-CSmin, LV lateral wall activation time, ΔLV, and LBB potential were compared between LBBP and LVSP. Stimulated LV activation time (S-LVAT) and stimulated QRS duration (S-QRSd) were also compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to develop a prediction algorithm for LBBP. Of the 43 prospectively enrolled patients, 27 underwent LBBP and 16 underwent LVSP. All LBBP patients showed identical LV activation sequences to their intrinsic rhythm while no LVSP patients maintained their intrinsic sequence. S-CSmax, ΔLV, LV lateral wall activation time, and S-LVAT during LBBP were significantly shorter than those during LVSP. Combining LBB potential with S-LVAT had the largest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.985 for confirming LBBP with a sensitivity of 95.2% and a specificity of 93.7%., Conclusions: Compared with LVSP, LBBP preserves a normal LV activation sequence and better electrical synchrony. A combination of LBB potential with S-LVAT can be an effective and practical model to distinguish LBBP from LVSP during implantation in patients with normal LBB activation., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Septal myectomy for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is associated with conduction block; however, the electrophysiological characteristics of conduction block have not been well characterized. The aim of study was to assess the feasibility and safety of His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in patients with septal myectomy-associated conduction block., Methods and Results: Patients with HCM and indications for pacing or cardiac resynchronization therapy after septal myectomy were included. Electrophysiological mapping was performed to identify the site of block. The success rates and pacing characteristics of HBP and LBBAP were also recorded. The echocardiographic data and complications were documented and tracked during follow-up. Ten patients with atrioventricular block (AVB) or left bundle branch block (LBBB) post-myectomy were included in the study. The site of block was infranodal in the nine patients with AVB. HBP failed due to the lack of distal His bundle capture (N = 7) or LBBB correction (N = 3). LBBAP was successful in nine patients and failed in one. QRS duration narrowed from 163.3 ± 16.6 ms after surgery to 123.6 ± 15.8 ms during LBBAP (p < .001). The mean depth of the leads was 13.3 ± 4.0 mm (range from 10 to 20 mm). At a mean follow-up of 5.3 ± 3.9 months, pacing parameters and left ventricular ejection fraction remained stable., Conclusions: Electrophysiological mapping revealed that the site of block was infra-Hisian and not correctable with HBP in patients with HCM post-myectomy. LBBAP appears to be a more feasible physiological strategy for these patients., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Biventricular pacing has shown excellent results in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB). Studies have shown that the patients with abnormal axis deviation may benefit less from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as compared to those with the normal axis. The exact reason for left axis deviation (LAD) in LBBB is not known but could be due to diseased left anterior fascicle, left ventricular enlargement, or due to advanced electrical remodeling., Methods: The aim of the study was to analyze the incidence of LAD in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) with LBBB and the clinical outcomes following left bundle branch pacing (LBBP)., Results: We have included 64 consecutive patients with NICM and LBBB, who underwent successful LBBP. Patients were divided into two groups-Group I with baseline normal axis (n = 40; 63%) and Group II with LAD (n = 24; 37%). The mean axis changed from +23.6 ± 28.8° at baseline to +16.5 ± 35.1° and from -40.4 ± 10.3° at baseline to 7.08 ± 41.1° after LBBP in Group I and Group II, respectively. LBBP retained the normal axis in 93% of Group I patients and normalized the axis in 75% of Group II patients. The percentage changes in QRS duration, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter were similar in both the groups (+40% vs. +32%; p = .52, +64% vs. +50%; p = 0.34, -8% vs. -6%; p = .76, respectively). Capturing the proximal LBB would correct the LAD by recruitment of left anterior fascicles and pacing proximal to the site of the septal breakthrough of the right bundle branch activation wavefront during LBBB., Conclusion: LBBP as an alternative strategy for CRT could result in similar improvement in LBBB patients with LAD as in those with the normal axis., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: During left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) lead implantation, intermittent monitoring of unipolar pacing characteristics confirms LBB capture and can detect septal perforation. We aimed to demonstrate that continuous uninterrupted unipolar pacing from an inserted lead stylet (LS) is feasible and facilitates LBBAP implantation., Methods: Thirty patients (mean age 76 ± 14 years) were implanted with a stylet-driven pacing lead (Biotronik Solia S60). In 10 patients (comparison-group) conventional implantation with interrupted unipolar pacing was performed, with comparison of unipolar pacing characteristics between LS and connector-pin (CP)-pacing after each rotation step. In 20 patients (uninterrupted-group) performance and safety of uninterrupted implantation during continuous pacing from the LS were evaluated., Results: In the comparison group, LS and CP-pacing impedances were highly correlated (R 2  = 0.95, p < .0001, bias 12 ± 37 Ω) with comparable sensed electrograms and paced QRS morphologies. In the uninterrupted group, continuous LS-pacing allowed beat-to-beat monitoring of impedance and QRS morphology to guide implantation. This resulted in successful LBBAP in all patients, after a mean of 1 ± 0 attempts, with mean threshold 0.81 ± 0.4 V, median sensing 6.5 mV [IQR 4.4-9.5], and mean impedance 624 ± 101 Ω. Positive LBBAP-criteria were seen in all patients with median paced QRS duration of 120 ms [IQR 112-152 ms] and median pLVAT 73 ms [IQR 68-80.5 ms]. No septal perforation occurred., Conclusion: Unipolar pacing from the LS allows accurate determination of pacing impedance and generates similar paced QRS morphologies and sensed electrograms to CP pacing. Continuous LS pacing allows real-time monitoring of impedance and paced QRS morphology, which facilitates safe and successful LBBAP lead implantation., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Multielectrode epicardial mapping during robotic implantation of cardiac resynchronization-defibrillator system. Robotically assisted endoscopic implantation of cardiac implantable devices is well documented to be both feasible and safe, and this technique provides particular benefit in patients with limited vascular access. In a patient meeting Class I indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator and inaccessible vascular access, we describe in this case an optimization strategy for intraoperative left ventricular lead placement utilizing robotic epicardial electroanatomic mapping as well as the feasibility of implanting a totally epicardial biventricular cardioverter-defibrillator system., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Introduction: Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is characterized with a low and stable pacing capture threshold, relatively narrow QRS duration due to fast left ventricular activation, and direct excitation of the diseased left bundle branch. This report aims to describe the methods, procedural skills, and clinical implications of performing LBBP implantation., Methods and Results: LBBP is achieved by transventricular-septal approach. There are two methods to identify the location for LBBP lead placement: the single-lead method and the dual-lead method. During implantation, the unique transition of the paced QRS morphology and pacing parameter changes are important for guiding the lead - advancement to the left side of the interventricular septum. In our experience, LBBP can be safely performed in most patients requiring pacemaker therapy., Conclusion: Clinical development of LBBP is at an early but encouraging phase with increasing clinical use, and a standardized procedure with improved delivery tools and pacing leads is needed, as well as long-term efficacy and safety., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Introduction: Loperamide, an antidiarrheal agent, is a µ-opioid receptor agonist increasingly abused to prevent opioid withdrawal or to produce euphoric effects. At supra-therapeutic doses, loperamide can cause cardiac toxicity due to blockade of Na and I Kr channels, resulting in wide QRS rhythms, severe bradycardia, prolonged QTc, polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, cardiac arrest, and death. There are limited data on the cardiotoxic effects of high dose loperamide., Methods and Results: A case report of loperamide toxicity is presented and then added to a contemporary review of the literature. In total, the presentation and management of 36 cases of loperamide cardiotoxicity are summarized. The overall median daily dose (interquartile range) of loperamide was 200 (134-400) mg. The median QRS duration was 160 (125-170) ms. The median QTc duration was 620 (565-701) ms. Ventricular tachycardia was experienced by 24/36 (67%) of patients, 20 of which were specified to be polymorphic. Treatment was supportive, providing advanced cardiopulmonary life support and aggressive electrolyte repletion. Isoproterenol infusion or overdrive pacing was employed in 19/36 (53%) of cases. The median time to electrocardiogram normalization or hospital discharge, whichever came first, was 5 (3.5-10) days., Conclusion: Loperamide overdose is a toxidrome that remains underrecognized, and in patients with unexplained cardiac arrhythmias, loperamide toxicity should be suspected. Prompt recognition is critical due to the delayed recovery and high risk for life-threatening arrhythmias., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

The retrograde aortic (RA) route is a widely used access route for mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardias (VT) arising from the left ventricular endocardium. With the expanding role of VT ablation in patients with significant comorbidity, the choice between the RA and transseptal access routes is an increasingly important consideration. An individualized decision based on the location of the arrhythmogenic substrate, vascular anatomy, aortic valve morphology, and operator experience is necessary when deciding on the optimal access route. Among patients with challenging vascular anatomy, growing experience from structural interventions such as transcatheter aortic valve replacements and peripheral vascular interventions has provided valuable insights into techniques for safe retrograde access. The present review focuses on patient selection for RA access, potential complications associated with the technique, and optimal approaches for access in patients with challenging vascular or aortic valve anatomy., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Aims: His bundle pacing (HBP) is a feasible and reliable alternative to conventional right ventricular pacing (RVP), but associated ECG (electrocardiogram) changes have not been well-studied. This study aimed to determine the mechanisms underlying ECG changes associated with HBP using patient-specific multiscale heart simulations., Methods: ECGs were recorded in two patients who were treated by HBP under a native rhythm and HBP at high and low voltages. We created patient-specific multiscale simulation heart models of these patients and performed ECG simulation under these conditions. Using these results and detailed information on the electrical field around the pacing lead, we investigated mechanisms underlying the observed ECG changes., Results: Heart simulations successfully reproduced ECGs under a native rhythm for both cases. In case 1, nonselective HBP produced a left bundle branch (LBB) block pattern, which was reproduced as a selective right bundle branch (RBB) pacing. However, in case 2, ECG under nonselective HBP showed an RBB block pattern, which could not be reproduced by the commonly used framework. Findings on the electrical field and anatomy of the His bundle and its branches suggested that longitudinal dissociation of the His bundle and transition of thickness in the stem of the LBB caused a conduction delay in the RBB to produce these ECG changes in this patient., Conclusion: Variations in the anatomy of the His bundle and its branches may underlie the diverse ECG responses to HBP. These variations should be taken into account when performing this therapy., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

The major sites of origins of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias have been elucidated. Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias most often present as premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) with a focal mechanism, and commonly occur without structural heart disease. Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias usually originate from specific anatomical structures, commonly endocardial but sometimes epicardial and exhibit characteristic electrocardiograms (ECGs) based on their anatomical background. There are general and specific ECG characteristics that can localize the site of idiopathic PVC origins. The general ECG characteristics include the bundle branch block pattern, axis, QRS polarity in lead V6, QRS duration, precordial transition, maximal deflection index, and so forth. They can roughly localize the site of idiopathic PVC origins. Several major sites of idiopathic PVC origins are located close to each other, and specific ECG characteristics are helpful for localizing the site of origins more accurately in those PVCs. Twelve-lead surface ECG algorithms usually can localize the site of idiopathic PVC origins with a high accuracy, but their accuracy can be limited by the patients' physique, heart rotation, specific conduction properties, presence of structural heart disease, and so forth. This review describes an overview of the approaches to the 12-lead surface ECG localization of idiopathic PVCs, and also discusses their caveats and limitations., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Pulmonary delivery of flecainide results in the rapid conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) to normal sinus rhythm in large-animal models and is safe and well-tolerated by normal human volunteers., Objective: We investigated the effects of pulmonary delivery of flecainide on atrial and ventricular depolarization and repolarization duration., Methods: Intratracheal instillation (1.5 mg/kg, rapid push) of flecainide or sterile water (placebo) was performed in 12 closed-chest, anesthetized Yorkshire pigs with a catheter positioned at the bifurcation of the main bronchi. High-resolution electrograms obtained from catheters fluoroscopically positioned in the right atrium and left ventricle circumvented measurement errors due to the fusion of P and T waves in surface leads when rapid heart rates shortened the TP interval. Pacing was achieved using electrical stimuli delivered via right atrial catheter electrodes., Results: During sinus rhythm (98 ± 4.7 beats/min), intratracheal flecainide caused comparable (P = 0.56) increases in atrial depolarization (P a ) duration by 22% (39.8 ± 3.2 to 48.7 ± 3.3  milliseconds) and left ventricular (LV) QRS complex duration by 20% (47.9 ± 1.6 to 57.3 ± 1.8  milliseconds) at peak effect at 2 minutes post-dosing. During right atrial pacing at 180 beats/min, P a duration increased by 55% (37.0 ± 2.0 to 57.2 ± 1.6  milliseconds; P < 0.0001). The atrial response was greater (p = 0.001) than the 30% increase in LV QRS complex duration (46.6 ± 1.7 to 60.6 ± 2.5  milliseconds; P = 0.005). P a duration and QRS complex duration were unchanged by placebo independent of pacing (P ≥ 0.4 for both). Atrial repolarization duration (PT a ; P = 0.46) and QT c interval (P = 0.49) remained unchanged., Conclusion: Intratracheal flecainide exerts a rate-dependent, predominant effect on atrial compared with ventricular depolarization duration. Pulmonary delivery of flecainide could facilitate AF conversion to sinus rhythm with reduced ventricular proarrhythmia risk., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)