Search

Introduction CF-sensing catheter emerged as a novel ablation technology and was increasingly used in clinical practice. Nonetheless, available evidence of efficacy and safety comparison between CF-guided RF catheter ablation and non-CF-guided ablation for treatment of AF was still lacking. Methods and results Twenty-two eligible studies were included after systematic review through the MEDLINE, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library and PubMed databases. AF/atrial tachycardia-free survival was markedly improved in CF-guided catheter ablation compared with non-CF-guided ablation at a median 12-month follow-up (RR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.19, p = 0.000, fixed). Notably, CF-guided catheter ablation presented a robust survival benefit for treatment of paroxysmal AF (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.18, p = 0.005, fixed), but not persistent AF (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.28, p = 0.466, fixed). Moreover, procedure time (WMD: -23.87, 95% CI: -33.83 to -13.91, p = 0.000, random), fluoroscopy time (WMD: -7.78, 95% CI: -13.93 to -1.63, p = 0.013, random) and RF time (WMD: -3.98, 95% CI: -7.78 to -0.17, p = 0.040, random) were significantly reduced in CF-guided catheter ablation. The incidence of procedure-related complications did not differ between these two technologies (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.59 to 1.16, p = 0.271, fixed). Conclusion CF-guided RF catheter ablation was associated with a significant AF/atrial tachycardia-free survival benefit compared with non-CF-guided ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF rather than persistent AF. In addition, CF-guided ablation strategy also reduced the procedure time, fluoroscopy time, as well as RF time despite no distinct effect on the alleviation of procedure-related complications. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Epicardial Ventricular Arrhythmias. Idiopathic epicardial ventricular arrhythmias (IEVAs) originating from the vicinity of the coronary sinus system are not uncommon, accounting for about 9% of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia cases. IEVAs share clinical presentation and electrophysiological characteristics with ventricular arrhythmias arising from the right ventricular outflow tract possibly as manifestations of cAMP-mediated triggered activity and delayed after-depolarizations. Detailed analysis of standard 12-lead electrocardiogram morphology by using unique variables and algorithms allows clinicians to predict probable location of epicardial foci and informs optimal catheter ablation strategy. Epicardial mapping and ablation through the coronary sinus and its branches is effective and safe, and increasingly favored. However, it is important because of the common perivascular origin of IEVAs to perform coronary angiography prior to or after ablation and to select the appropriate ablation energy form to avoid serious complications.

Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Epicardial Ventricular Arrhythmias. Idiopathic epicardial ventricular arrhythmias (IEVAs) originating from the vicinity of the coronary sinus system are not uncommon, accounting for about 9% of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia cases. IEVAs share clinical presentation and electrophysiological characteristics with ventricular arrhythmias arising from the right ventricular outflow tract possibly as manifestations of cAMP-mediated triggered activity and delayed after-depolarizations. Detailed analysis of standard 12-lead electrocardiogram morphology by using unique variables and algorithms allows clinicians to predict probable location of epicardial foci and informs optimal catheter ablation strategy. Epicardial mapping and ablation through the coronary sinus and its branches is effective and safe, and increasingly favored. However, it is important because of the common perivascular origin of IEVAs to perform coronary angiography prior to or after ablation and to select the appropriate ablation energy form to avoid serious complications.