Search

OBJECTIVES: Short-term high-dose atorvastatin administered before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces the rate of periprocedural myocardial infarction (pMI) in high-risk patients, such as those with acute coronary syndromes and those with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. It is unknown whether short-term high-dose administration reduces the rate of pMI in patients with chronic kidney disease. Recently, we observed that in 304 patients with estimated creatinine clearance less than 60 ml/min randomized to receive 80 mg/day of atorvastatin or placebo for 48 h before elective coronary angiography and/or angioplasty, statin administration did not reduce contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). In this post-hoc analysis, we evaluate the pMI in the subgroup of 161 patients who underwent PCI. METHODS: In all patients, creatine kinase myocardial isoenzyme (CK-MB) [upper reference limit (URL) 5 ng/ml] was assessed before and at 12 and 24 h after PCI. The pMI, defined as CK-MB elevation more than three times the URL, occurred in 27 (17%) patients. RESULTS: The incidence of pMI was 10.4% (of 77 patients) in the atorvastatin and 23% (of 84 patients) in the placebo group (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified the pretreatment with high-dose atorvastatin as an independent predictor of reduced risk of pMI [odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.96, P < 0.05]. CONCLUSION: This post-hoc analysis shows that short-term high-dose atorvastatin administration reduced pMI in patients with renal dysfunction submitted to elective PCI, but without benefit regarding CIN prevention.

To develop a simplified scoring system based on preprocedure clinical characteristics to predict contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) before elective coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).CIN is associated with increased mortality and morbidity following coronary angiography and PCI and accounts for increased hospital costs.Several baseline clinical characteristics of 1218 patients were considered as candidate univariate predictors of CIN (increaseor =0.5 mg/dl in serum creatinine within 5 days after contrast exposure). On the basis of the odds ratio at multivariate logistic regression, seven markers (with weighted scores) were identified as independent correlates of CIN: age at least 73 years (1), diabetes mellitus (2), left ventricular ejection fraction 45% or less (2), baseline serum creatinine value at least 1.5 mg/dl (2), baseline creatinine clearance 44 ml/min or less (2), posthydration creatinineor = prehydration creatinine value (2) and one procedure effected within the past 72 h (3).CIN occurred in 114 (9.4%) patients [range 1.1-52.1% for a low (or =3) and very high (or =9) risk score, respectively]; the odds of CIN increased significantly with each class (Cochran-Armitage chi-square, P0.0001) and the risk score allowed us to determine patients with low and high risk for postprocedure CIN (c-statistic = 0.86). These results were reproduced in a validation set.Preprocedural clinical risk factors have different influences on the likelihood of CIN. Risk classification based on the most significant parameters can be used to predict CIN before contrast exposure. The simple scoring system proposed here provides a good estimate of the risk of CIN, allowing the interventional team to make adequate adjustment to the procedures.

Background In patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NST-ACS) that is treated invasively, glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors can be used either as upstream treatment in a coronary care unit or as downstream provisional treatment in selected patients who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The relative advantage of either strategy is unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess 30-day outcome of patients enrolled in a prospective NST-ACS registry and treated invasively with either of these two therapeutic strategies. Methods Patients treated invasively (coronary arteriography within 4 days of admission), in the prospective registry ROSAI-2, were divided into two groups according to the upstream use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors (n = 241), or not (n = 548). In the latter group, 76 (14%) patients received GPIIb/IIIa in association with a PCI procedure. Clinical and angiographic characteristics as well as in-hospital and 30-day outcome of these two groups of patients were compared. Results The two groups were similar with respect to age, sex, presence of hypertension, diabetes, number of PCI procedures. However, patients treated with upstream GPllb/llla blockers had more frequently ST-segment depression (P = 0.002), a high TIMI risk score (P = 0.01) and were more frequently admitted to centres with Cath Lab facilities (P = 0.001). At 30-day follow-up, the composite of death, acute myocardial infarction and stroke, as well as major bleeding, was not significantly different between the two groups, although it occurred more frequently in patients who received upstream GPIIb/IIIa blockers (9.5% versus 5.7% and 1.7% versus 0.2%, respectively). By multivariate analysis, diabetes [odds ratio (OR) = 2.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-4.09] and a diagnosis on admission of non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (OR = 2.0, 95% Cl = 1.10-3.6) were independently related to outcome. No additional risk or benefit was related to upstream GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment (OR = 1.5, 95% Cl = 0.84-2.68). Conclusions Among invasively-treated patients with NST-ACS, upstream treatment with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors was used in those with a higher clinical risk profile, whereas downstream treatment was reserved for a limited number of patients undergoing PCI. Thirty-day outcome was similar in the two groups, irrespective of the treatment strategy used.