Search

Aims: The impact of sex-related factors on current clinical management and outcomes of chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) are unclear., Methods: All patients belonging to the prospective, nationwide START registry were included. Their baseline characteristics, diagnostic workup, revascularization strategy, pharmacological treatment and 1-year clinical outcomes were compared with respect to sex overall and in age tertiles., Results: A total of 5070 consecutive patients were included. Most patients were males (80.1%). As expected, the prevalence of females increased with age. Distribution of risk factors and history of cardiovascular disease were different depending on sex, as well as diagnostic workup, with lower use of exercise stress testing in women (25.1% vs. 36.7%, P < 0.0001). The use of coronary angiography was similar in the two groups. Women had lower rates of multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) (33.0% vs. 40.6% P < 0.0001) and higher rates of nonobstructive CAD (18.3% vs. 11.3%, P < 0.0001). Rates of myocardial revascularization were similar, but women were more likely to receive percutaneous coronary intervention than men (84.3% vs. 77.8%, P < 0.0001) and less likely to receive surgical/hybrid revascularization (10.0% vs. 15.1%, P < 0.0001). At 12-month follow-up, no differences were observed for the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality, re-hospitalization for myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke or myocardial revascularization between males and females; however, a significantly worse perceived quality of life was observed in women., Conclusions: In a large nationwide cohort of patients with CCS, clinical outcomes were not different depending on sex. However, several differences in the diagnostic work-up, treatment strategies and quality of life were found between sexes., (Copyright © 2024 Italian Federation of Cardiology - I.F.C. All rights reserved.)

Bloodstream cholesterol is a central contributor to atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. For several decades, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been the main biomarker for the prediction of cardiovascular events and therapeutic target of lipid-lowering treatments. More recently, several findings have supported the greater reliability of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) as a predictive factor and possible therapeutic target in refining antiatherogenic treatments, especially among patients with lower LDL-C and higher triglyceride values. This article discusses the limits of current standard methods for assessing LDL-C levels and emphasizes the persistent residual cardiovascular risk in patients treated with lipid-lowering agents on the basis of recommended LDL-C targets. It highlights that patients with controlled LDL-C and non-targeted non-HDL-C have a higher cardiovascular risk. The article focuses on the role of non-HDL-C as a better predictor of atherosclerotic disease as compared with LDL-C and as a therapeutic target. Finally, this article includes an executive summary aimed at refining preventive approaches in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease., (Copyright © 2021 Italian Federation of Cardiology - I.F.C. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Clinical management of patients more than 1 year after acute myocardial infarction (MI) is challenging. Patient risk stratification may help to establish therapeutic priorities. We aimed to describe the comprehensive risk profile and management of patients with prior MI., Methods: We analyzed data from the EYESHOT Post-MI study, which evaluated the management of patients 1-3 years after MI. The risk profile of participants was defined according to the qualifying high-risk features of the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial (history of diabetes, history of recurrent MI, angiographic evidence of multivessel coronary disease, chronic kidney disease with estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min, age ≥65 years). Patients were classified into five subgroups according to the presence of zero, one, two, three, or more than three features., Results: Of the 1633 patients in the EYESHOT Post-MI study, 1008 could be stratified according to PEGASUS-TIMI 54 high-risk features. About 22% of patients had no high-risk features, whereas 25% showed at least three features. The prevalence of patients with specific clinical severity indicators was progressively higher with the increasing number of high-risk features. Dual antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulation were more frequently used in patients with an increasing number of high-risk features (P for trend <0.0001). Lipid-lowering therapies were less frequently prescribed in patients with a higher number of features (P for trend 0.006 for statins; P for trend 0.007 for ezetimibe)., Conclusion: Higher-risk post-MI patients, identified by PEGASUS-TIMI 54 high-risk features, showed an increased prevalence of major clinical severity indicators. Secondary prevention therapies were not adequately implemented in higher-risk patients., (Copyright © 2020 Italian Federation of Cardiology - I.F.C. All rights reserved.)

The central role of high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease has led to research focused on lipid-lowering agents for cardiovascular risk reduction. Bempedoic acid is an emerging treatment for hypercholesterolemia that has recently been approved for marketing in the United States and Europe. This review focuses on its mechanism of action and summarizes the main preclinical study findings. Furthermore, we report the clinical evidence supporting and guiding its use in hypercholesterolemia management., (Copyright © 2020 Italian Federation of Cardiology - I.F.C. All rights reserved.)

Recreational drug use may cause coronary artery disease through several mechanisms. An increasing number of young patients with drug-related acute coronary syndrome have been reported over recent years. The present position statement reports the most recent epidemiological data on acute coronary syndrome in the setting of drug abuse, describes the main pathophysiological mechanisms underlying coronary artery disease and acute events in these patients, and provides practical recommendations on management and an overview of prognosis., (Copyright © 2020 Italian Federation of Cardiology - I.F.C. All rights reserved.)

: Cardiovascular disease and cancer are responsible for the majority of deaths in the Western world. These two entities share common risk factors and their intersection will be more and more frequent in future due to general population aging and long-term cancer control. Clinical presentation, management and outcome of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in cancer patients could differ from noncancer ones. Cancer patients were frequently excluded from clinical trials and so the paucity of data further complicates the scenario. The management of ACS in cancer patients represents a unique setting in which the risk/benefit ratio of invasive treatment should be carefully evaluated. This review focused on the available evidence of all aspects of ACS in cancer patients providing a guide to a multidisciplinary approach.

Background: Atrial fibrillation is common in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) although its impact on ACS remains controversial., Aim: To describe in-hospital management of patients with atrial fibrillation and ACS evaluating the impact of atrial fibrillation on in-hospital and mid-term outcome., Methods: We analysed the data of two prospective multicentre nationwide registries (IN-ACS Outcome and MANTRA) to assess clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with ACS and atrial fibrillation. Study outcomes included death from any cause and a composite end-point of death/re-infarction/stroke/major bleeding within index admission and 6 months' follow-up., Results: Out of 12 288 ACS patients, 1236 (10.1%) had atrial fibrillation at admission or developed it during hospitalization. Atrial fibrillation patients were older, more often female, and had higher burden of comorbidities. In-hospital mortality was higher among atrial fibrillation patients (8.7 vs. 2.4%, P < 0.001). Patients with atrial fibrillation had a higher incidence of re-infarction (3.5 vs. 1.7%, P < 0.0001) and ischemic stroke (1.7 vs. 0.4%, P < 0.001) compared with those in sinus rhythm. Major bleedings were also more frequent among atrial fibrillation patients (1.9 vs. 0.9%, P < 0.001). In-hospital and at 6 months' follow-up death from any cause occurred more often in atrial fibrillation patients than in those without atrial fibrillation (9.4 vs. 3.5%, P < 0.0001). At multivariable analysis, atrial fibrillation was an independent predictor of the in-hospital composite end-point (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.35-2.06, P < 0.0001) but not at 6 months' follow-up. The independent role of atrial fibrillation on the in-hospital composite end-point was also confirmed by propensity score analyses., Conclusion: Atrial fibrillation was an independent predictor for adverse in-hospital outcome in ACS. This effect disappeared at mid-term follow-up, whereas noncardiac comorbidities emerged as prognostic factors of adverse outcomes.

: Despite substantial progress in the treatment of atherosclerotic disease a non-negligible rate of acute atherothrombotic events persists. Evidence suggesting a safer profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with vitamin K antagonists and the involvement of coagulation in the atherosclerotic process has led to exploration of the role of DOACs in the prevention of atherothrombotic events. In this review, we discuss the findings of recent studies on DOACs, particularly rivaroxaban, in atherothrombotic disease which represents a new clinical setting for oral anticoagulants.