1. Current status on vascular substitutes.
- Author
-
Lejay A, Vento V, Kuntz S, Steinmetz L, Georg Y, Thaveau F, Heim F, and Chakfé N
- Subjects
- Animals, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects, Graft Occlusion, Vascular etiology, Graft Occlusion, Vascular physiopathology, Humans, Prosthesis-Related Infections etiology, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Thrombosis etiology, Thrombosis physiopathology, Treatment Outcome, Vascular Diseases physiopathology, Vascular Patency, Blood Vessel Prosthesis adverse effects, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation instrumentation, Polytetrafluoroethylene chemistry, Prosthesis Design, Vascular Diseases surgery
- Abstract
In the last decades, the main evolution in the field of vascular surgery was correlated to the development and introduction of vascular substitutes. Currently, two types of synthetic vascular substitutes have been widely adopted: polyethylene terephthalate and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene. Ideally, they should demonstrate a behavior as close as possible as that of human arteries in terms of mechanical and biological properties. However, no vascular substitute has been found to compare with the patency rates of gold-standard autologous conduits, and major drawbacks of current vascular substitutes remain both thrombogenicity and infectability.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF