1. In vivo imaging shows continued association of several IFT-A, IFT-B and dynein complexes while IFT trains U-turn at the tip
- Author
-
Dennis R. Diener, Jenna L Wingfield, Betlehem Mekonnen, Ilaria Mengoni, Mareike A Jordan, Peiwei Liu, Karl F. Lechtreck, and Gaia Pigino
- Subjects
0303 health sciences ,BBSome ,Cilium ,Chlamydomonas ,education ,Dynein ,Dyneins ,Biological Transport ,macromolecular substances ,Cell Biology ,Biology ,Flagellum ,biology.organism_classification ,Protein Transport ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Flagella ,Intraflagellar transport ,Biophysics ,Cilia ,sense organs ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Research Article ,030304 developmental biology - Abstract
Flagellar assembly depends on intraflagellar transport (IFT), a bidirectional motility of protein carriers, the IFT trains. The trains are periodic assemblies of IFT-A and IFT-B subcomplexes and the motors kinesin-2 and IFT dynein. At the tip, anterograde trains are remodeled for retrograde IFT, a process that in Chlamydomonas involves kinesin-2 release and train fragmentation. However, the degree of train disassembly at the tip remains unknown. Here, we performed two-color imaging of fluorescent protein-tagged IFT components, which indicates that IFT-A and IFT-B proteins from a given anterograde train usually return in the same set of retrograde trains. Similarly, concurrent turnaround was typical for IFT-B proteins and the IFT dynein subunit D1bLIC–GFP but severance was observed as well. Our data support a simple model of IFT turnaround, in which IFT-A, IFT-B and IFT dynein typically remain associated at the tip and segments of the anterograde trains convert directly into retrograde trains. Continuous association of IFT-A, IFT-B and IFT dynein during tip remodeling could balance protein entry and exit, preventing the build-up of IFT material in flagella.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF