Search

Objective: We aimed to investigate the incidence of flow arrest during carotid artery stenting (CAS) with filter-type embolic protection device (EPD), identify any predisposing factors for those situations, and contemplate intraprocedural precautionary steps. Methods: CAS was performed in 128 patients with 132 arteries using filter-type EPD. The characteristics of treated patients and arteries were compared between groups with and without flow arrest. Results: The incidence of flow arrest during CAS with filter-type EPD was 17.4%. In flow arrest group, cases of vulnerable plaques (p=0.02) and symptomatic lesions (p=0.01) were significantly more common, and there were more cases of debris captured by EPD in a planar pattern (p<0.01). Vulnerable plaques were significantly more common in the procedures showing a planar pattern than in the cases with other patterns (p<0.01). Flow arrest group showed a significantly higher rate of ischemic complications (p<0.05), although there were no significant periprocedural neurological changes. The planar pattern of captured debris in filter-type EPD was the only significant risk factor for flow arrest (adjusted odds ratio 88.44, 95% confidence interval 15.21-514.45, p<0.05). Conclusions: Flow arrest during CAS with filter-type EPD is not uncommon and associated with increased ischemic complications. Symptomatic stenoses and vulnerable plaque are related to this event. The planar pattern of captured debris on the EPD was the only significant risk factor for the flow arrest. Clinicians must pay attention to the occurrence of flow arrest and react quickly when performing CAS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Non-aneurysmal spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (NASAH) has a good prognosis, but its cause has not been clearly identified. In this study, we assessed the clinical and radiological features of NASAH and suggested an anatomical relationship between the basilar tip anatomy and NASAH. Methods: From August 2013 to May 2020, 21 patients were diagnosed with NASAH at our institution. We evaluated the clinical features of NASAH. NASAH was classified into a perimesencephalic pattern and aneurysmal pattern according to the distribution of hemorrhage based on initial brain computed tomography. Digital subtraction angiography was used to classify the basilar tip anatomy into symmetric cranial fusion, symmetric caudal fusion, or asymmetric fusion types. Results: Of the 21 patients, twenty patients had a good clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 1–2; Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) 4–5). These patients showed improvement in mRS and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at the last follow-up (P=.003 and P=.016, respectively). Eighteen patients with NASAH (85.7%) had the caudal fusion type, and only three patients with NASAH (14.3%) had the cranial fusion type. Seven patients with the perimesencephalic pattern (77.8%) had the caudal fusion type, and eleven patients with the aneurysmal pattern (91.7%) had the caudal fusion type. Conclusions: In NASAH patients, the caudal fusion tends to occur frequently among patients with basilar tip anatomy. In the case of the caudal fusion, the perforators around the basilar tip would be more susceptible to hemodynamic stress, which could contribute to the occurrence of NASAH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]