Search

Apart from the importance of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in and of themselves, the potential contribution that they can make to Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) is huge. Even though some STEM fields have already incorporated SSH elements in their research and education, there are still other disciplines that have not yet approach the intersection between them and SSH. Among these is civil engineering (CE), which has traditionally been set as purely technological and has lacked the inclusion of SSH elements in it. Nonetheless, it is indispensable that engineers have knowledge in SSH to allow them to make decisions more perceptively, realistically and critically. Ultimately, this social understanding can lead them to design and plan solutions that are more socially sustainable. However, there are still no clear guidelines on how to include aspects from social sciences and humanities at the higher education level. This article analyses perceptions, the real status and possible barriers for the incorporation of SSH in the studies of CE. Besides, it analyses and discusses the different methodologies in which engineering students can be introduced to these topics. A triangulation method that combined the use of qualitative and quantitative data was used. Surveys to students, researchers, professors and practitioners were carried out (n=583). Besides, accreditation criteria and CE syllabuses of 100 faculties were reviewed. The analyses showed a dissent between individual perceptions, collective reality and legislative frameworks. Even though the survey responses showed a common agreement concerning the inclusion of SSH, only a minority of CE schools have introduced SSH in their curricula. Besides, accrediting bodies have not yet introduced this as a specific requirement in their criteria. The barriers detected in the incorporation of SSH in CE curricula were: (1) resistance to change, (2) external influences on the curricula, (3) lack of guidelines, (4) misconceptions on what SSH in relation to CE involves. It is necessary to gradually incorporate both hard social skills and soft skills from the beginning of the degree courses and to do so in a transversal way in most of the subjects if professionals and researchers that are capable of designing socially sustainable activities are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The first, and probably the most determining, decision that engineering teams need to make when facing the structural design of any infrastructure is the choice of both an appropriate material and the suitable structural typology for its components. Each component is required to satisfy technical and functional aspects imposed by standards and stakeholder. Currently, the aspects that are most frequently considered in decision-making processes are economic. Nevertheless, environmental and social criteria are also required if one aims at making sustainability-based decisions. In this regard, to the best of the authors' knowledge, very few tools or studies exist that can support decision-makers. The few that do exist, are rather limited, either because they fail to incorporate many relevant factors in the sustainability assessment of a project or because they only evaluate environmental and social impacts of a project as a whole. Although a global assessment is useful to gain a holistic understanding of impacts of a project and to compare them to other projects, it does not necessarily help engineering teams understand the impact of fundamental decisions made when designing individual structural components. Therefore, the aim of the present research paper is to develop a new method for the sustainability analysis of building structural components which has been specifically oriented to beams and girders. This is done by means of the Integrated Value Model for the Evaluation of Sustainability method, which is known by its Spanish acronym, MIVES (Modelo Integrado de Valor para una Evaluación Sostenible). This method draws on multi-attribute utility theory and that allows building an integrated value model as an approach for multi-criteria decision-making. The developed model has been applied to assess the sustainability of different alternatives of beams and trusts to support the non-accessible roof of a sports hall in Vila-seca, Spain. Different material types and structural typologies are analysed. The findings show that the most sustainable alternatives are timber and reinforced concrete trusses, which are actually two options that are seldom used in practice. • A model to evaluate the sustainability of structural elements is developed. • MIVES is proved to be an adequate sustainability assessment tool in these cases. • Girders and trusses made of timber, concrete and steel are analysed. • Timber and concrete trusses achieve the highest global sustainability indexes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The design of building foundations has usually been based on tradition, local practice, experience, and structural design codes. Safety is invariably considered the main factor and environmental criteria (or, in general, sustainability) is seldom given due consideration. However, similar safety indicators can be achieved with different variables and a minimum safety factor must always be ensured. The main objective of this study is, from an environmental perspective, to assess the influence of the construction system (cast-in-situ or precast), foundation type (rigid or flexible), and structural code (EC-2 or EHE-08) in the case of a concrete shallow foundation (CSF), using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Applying this methodology, the materials (concrete and steel) yielded the highest impacts in all categories, at around 95% for cast-in-situ CSFs and at around 85% for precast CSFs, both in relation to global warming. Consequently, optimization of the amount of these materials is crucial when considering the particular variables selected in this study. The results showed that cast-in-situ and flexible CSFs at moderately shallow depths (and therefore with less steel reinforcement) and precast CSFs with considerable reductions in concrete volumes (due to sloped shapes) had lower environmental impacts. In addition, cast-in-situ CSFs constructed in accordance with the EHE-08 structural code showed lower impacts, while precast CSFs complying with the EC-2 code were environmentally preferable. However, a specific study might be required for specific factors in each case (loads, soil type, structural settlement, among others). Relevant environmental effects associated with the three variables should therefore be given specific consideration in the development of structural design codes and future constructions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vertical farming is emerging as an effective measure to grow food in buildings and can increase food production in urban areas in a more sustainable manner. This study presents a comprehensive environmental assessment of food production in an integrated rooftop greenhouse (i-RTG) – an innovative vertical farm consisting of a rooftop greenhouse connected to a building – and considers rainwater, residual heat (energy), residual air (CO 2 ) and food from an industrial ecology perspective. This synergistic connection preserves resources and improves conditions in the greenhouse and the building. The goal of the study is to show the feasibility of the system and to calculate the environmental impacts from its whole life cycle, from infrastructure to end of life, by comparing these impacts with those of conventional production. The results show that the system is feasible and produced 30.2 kg/m 2 of tomato over 15.5 months. The synergy with the building allows the cultivation of winter-fall crops without supplying heating and maintained an average temperature 8 °C higher than that outdoors. Moreover, rainwater was used to irrigate the crops, reducing consumption from the water supply network by 80–90%. The environmental assessment showed that the operation of the i-RTG has more impacts than the infrastructure (structure of the greenhouse, rainwater harvesting system and equipment) due to the use of fertilisers, which account for 25% of the impacts in four of the six impact categories studied. Regarding the infrastructure, the greenhouse structure and rainwater harvesting system of the building have substantial environmental impacts (over 30% in four of the six impact categories). Comparison with a conventional greenhouse demonstrates that the i-RTG has a better environmental performance, showing between 50 and 75% lower impacts in five of the six impact categories (for instance, 0.58 kg of CO 2 equivalent per kg of tomato vs. 1.7 kg), mainly due to the reduced packaging and transport requirements. From this study, it was concluded that optimisation of the amount of infrastructure material and management of the operation could lead to even better environmental performance in future i-RTG projects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]