Search

Because transport in the port hinterlands heavily depends on roads with negative externalities, much social interest has been in modal shifts (MSs) to rail and shipping with lower environmental impact. Currently, leading industry sectors to ambitiously embrace technological innovations to decarbonize—consequently, in line with these changes, the significance of MSs should change; however, no previous studies have comprehensively presented the overall CO 2 emissions and transport mode shares for future regional cargo transport. This paper presents a scenario analysis of CO 2 emission reductions in the Japanese domestic hinterland of international maritime container transport based on future scenarios of technological innovation and change in shipper behavior. The simulation results using the global logistics intermodal network simulation model showed that up to 87% CO 2 reduction is possible, and the primary driver for this is technological innovation. Moreover, the significance of MSs fluctuates depending on the advancement of technological innovation, suggesting that MSs hold a degree of import as a decarbonization measure during the transitional phase toward carbon neutrality (CN) as technological innovation advances. The results of this study, which fluctuated considerably by scenario and timing, have policy implications with respect to the path to be followed toward CN, including whether to promote MSs. • Scenario analysis of CO 2 emission reductions in Japanese maritime transportation. • Up to 87% CO 2 reduction possible using technological innovation. • Significance of modal shifts fluctuated with the degree of technological innovation. • Policy implications suggesting that the path toward carbon neutrality is crucial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper examines the life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction and associated marginal costs (MC) in Japan when the government enhances the transition to battery electric passenger vehicles (BEVs) by implementing a rapid investment regime for charging stations and fossil-fueled vehicle bans. Important factors affecting BEV emissions are battery performance, battery production technology, electricity generation mix and battery minimum state of charge (SOC min). We find that in addition to a rapid investment regime, a fossil-fueled vehicles ban policy is necessary to significantly increase the uptake of BEVs and achieves the deepest reduction in life cycle GHG emissions. Under this policy, with carbon neutral electricity by 2050 and a low SOC min charging regime, life-cycle GHG emissions are reduced by 48% and the MC by 53% in 2060. A carbon neutral light transport fleet in 2050 will require carbon capture and storage to offset 24 million tonnes-CO 2 equivalent of emissions even if electricity is carbon neutral by 2050 and users adhere to a low SOC min charging regime. [Display omitted] • Enhanced infrastructure development has a little impact on the uptake of BEVs. • The more stringent vehicle ban reduces life cycle GHG emissions the most. • Battery charging regime is crucial to GHG emissions reduction and associated cost. • Improving battery and vehicle production is crucial to GHG emissions reduction. • Carbon neutral light vehicle transport by 2050 requires carbon capture and storage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigates the impacts of carbon pricing policies on firms' greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. We include two carbon pricing policies: carbon tax and emission trading scheme (ETS) at national and sub-national (province) levels, measured as policy existence (binary variable) and carbon price (continuous variable). Firms' GHG emissions are measured as total emissions and emission intensity. Using unique recent firm-level data from 2010 to 2021 from three East Asia countries (Japan, the Republic of Korea (ROK), and the People's Republic of China (PRC)), we obtain the following key findings. First, the national carbon pricing policy significantly reduced firms' GHG emissions and GHG emission intensity in Japan and the ROK. The greater the carbon price, the greater the impact. Second, the subnational carbon pricing policies implemented in two provinces of Japan (Saitama and Tokyo) decreased firms' GHG emissions. Third, heavy industry sectors such as energy, utilities, and industrials experienced a substantial decrease in GHG emission intensity due to the carbon pricing policy. Finally, our main results are robust to different model specifications and various measures of firms' GHG emissions. Although literature studying the ex-post impact of carbon pricing on emissions at country and sector-level is abundant, this paper contributes to the existing literature providing empirical evidence of the impact of carbon pricing policies on firms' emissions using firm-level data, which is highly limited especially in Asia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The development of new technologies leads to the extensive use of abiotic resources and possible disruptions in the supply of material due to political, economic, and environmental reasons. To understand the impact of such disruptions on the economy, a comprehensive criticality assessment is necessary. As Japan is the third largest economy globally and heavily reliant of imports, the criticality of abiotic resources might become a pressing issue. However, previous criticality assessments of Japan have been limited in scope, failing to assess the overall supply disruption risks. Thus, this paper aims at identifying critical aspects of 35 abiotic materials used in the Japanese economy using the SCARCE method – an approach considering supply risk, vulnerability, social and environmental aspects to comprehensively analyse criticality. In the context of supply risk and vulnerability, the minerals niobium and phosphorus have been identified as the most critical. The criticality of niobium can be attributed to its significant trade barriers and production concentration, while that of phosphorus is primarily influenced by its high demand and lack of substitutes. Gold is the material with the highest criticality from environmental point of view due to the environmental implications related to its production. In the social context, the most critical mineral is antimony due to high level of small-scale and artisanal mining. In addition to the Japanese criticality, the results reflect the global one, showing the materials globally less critical and thus especially relevant to the Japanese economy. Next to providing results of 35 materials for evaluating their role in the Japanese economy, the underlying Python code is provided for adaptation for further criticality assessments of other regions. Based on these results, specific resource management strategies can be developed for Japan to ensure the availability of essential abiotic resources for the Japanese economy. • Criticality assessment with a vast array of economic, environmental and social indicators. • Criticality assessment applied to the case study of Japan and transparent calculation methodology. • Platinum and lignite pose highest supply risk for Japan. Critical in terms of vulnerability are phosphorus and nickel. • The environmental and social hotspots for Japan are gold and antimony respectively. • Japanese and global criticality comparison highlights the importance of lignite, lithium, and nickel for Japan's economy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Motivated by the novel viewpoint that the two major corporate sustainability disclosure theories – that is, legitimacy theory and voluntary disclosure theory – are not exclusively competing, this study re-evaluates the two theories using our quality-based climate disclosure measures developed based on the 2018 CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) questionnaire. From Tobit and ordinal logistic regression analyses with the public chemical firms in the United States and Japan, we document that firms with higher greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are more likely to choose extensive low -quality climate change disclosure rather than high -quality. This finding supports the legitimacy theory that firms tend to utilize low -quality climate change disclosure to obfuscate and legitimize their GHG emissions. However, we do not find evidence supporting the voluntary disclosure theory that superior performers prefer extensive high -quality climate change disclosure rather than low -quality. This paper contributes to the literature by providing new theoretical insights on whether and how firms utilize quality-based climate change disclosure strategies in an attempt to achieve the goals accompanied by the two theories. Furthermore, our findings provide an important practical implication for regulators and policymakers that more concrete and stringent climate disclosure rules could effectively curb inferior performers' discretionary behavior to engage in low -quality disclosure. [Display omitted] • This study analyzes firms' purpose-driven choice of climate disclosure quality. • We developed quality-based climate change disclosure measures with multiple facets. • Legitimacy theory and voluntary disclosure theory are reconciled with each other. • Firms with high GHG emissions choose low -quality climate change disclosure. • The quality-based climate change disclosure supports the legitimacy theory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the frequent coastal activities of human beings, tens of thousands of tons of floating marine plastics pose a serious threat to marine ecosystems and human survival. This paper studies the feasibility of regional marine plastic garbage management, taking the Northwest Pacific as the research object. According to the Cobb-Douglas utility function of the costs and benefits of plastic processing in China, Japan and South Korea, the Shapley value method was used to analyze it. The study found that the data were substituted into the Shapley value model of cooperative game for calculation, and the results showed that any country joining the triple alliance U would create greater benefits, and obtain higher benefits than the sub alliance. It is a triple win situation for China, Japan and the South Korea to jointly manage marine plastic in the Northwest Pacific. The results of the model confirm that the three countries are willing to maintain long-term cooperation on marine plastic governance, this method can be used to solve the trans-national marine governance innovatively and promote regional ocean cooperation governance. At the same time, by comparing the Northwest Pacific Plan with other action plans, China, Japan and South Korea should abandon political controversy, seeking common ground while putting aside differences, to cooperate fully to curb the growing trend of plastic waste problem in the Northwest Pacific, and contribute to the sustainable development of regional marine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

China's economic growth has been progressively moving towards reducing carbon intensity. In parallel, Japan has long been regarded as the pioneer of energy efficiency worldwide. Why have these two economic giants had such different experiences of carbon intensity in the past decades? A closer examination in both countries may hold vital clues, which are still very unclear. This paper compares the patterns of carbon intensity between China and Japan, in which we propose a bilateral-country decomposition framework by combining production-theoretical decomposition analysis and index decomposition analysis. The decomposition highlights the effects of emission factor, energy structure, sectoral structure, substitution among labor-energy and capital-energy, and technological progress. The results show that the energy structure, sectoral structure, and capital-energy substitution are the main drivers behind that China is much higher carbon intensity than Japan, accounting for 26%, 25%, and 38%, respectively. Yet, these effects also narrowed the carbon intensity gap between China and Japan over the years. Furthermore, the labor-energy substitution effect has generally decreased the carbon intensity gap. The technological effect has a minor impact on the carbon intensity gap per year, while it plays a dominant role in enlarging the carbon intensity gap over time. • An improved approach is proposed to decompose driving forces of carbon intensity. • The approach is applied to carbon intensity gap between China and Japan. • Potential energy intensity of each sector is uncovered by input substitution. • Enabling policymakers in developing countries to reduce carbon intensity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study considers the emissions implications of co-combusting imported ammonia in coal-fired power stations. The study adopts a supply chain approach, estimating the emissions reduction potential of 20% ammonia co-combustion in coal-fired power stations in the country of use, and the emissions associated with ammonia production in the country of origin. The paper considers the emissions implications of using different ammonia production technologies: Haber-Bosch (HB) ammonia production with hydrogen generated from steam methane reforming using natural gas (SMR), with and without carbon capture and storage (CCS); Haber-Bosch ammonia production with hydrogen generated from renewable sources; and fully renewable electricity generated ammonia. The empirical setting of the study is an ammonia supply chain encompassing Japan and Australia. The results show co-combustion of ammonia produced with SMR-HB provides no net benefit for the combined country emissions, as ammonia production related greenhouse emissions in Australia are equivalent to the emission reductions in Japan. In contrast, co-firing ammonia produced from fully renewable sources reduces emissions in the two countries in 2030 by 43 MT per annum. SMR-HB processes with varying levels of CCS reduce annual emissions by 16–34 MT. Based on the results, different policy options are suggested for managing the emissions associated with a Japan-Australia ammonia supply chain. • Japan actively pursuing ammonia/coal co-combustion to reduce power sector greenhouse gas emissions. • An Australia-Japan ammonia supply is examined at a country boundary emissions basis. • Choice of ammonia manufacturing approach has significant impact on emissions. • 40 MT pa saving in Japan offset by 39 ± 11 MT pa increase in Australia from Best Available Technology. • Only a fully renewable ammonia manufacturing process reduces emissions in both Australia and Japan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Microgrids are an attractive way to deal with energy depletion and environmental deterioration as well as grid pressure. However, the energy configurations of microgrids comprising various uncertain and variable resources are significantly sophisticated. Focusing on the peak shaving ability and carbon reduction effect of microgrids, this paper proposes a multi-criteria evaluation method that aims to maximize the comprehensive value of microgrids. To unify these criteria with different perspectives when solving the optimization problem, the peak shaving and emission reduction effects are converted into economies through peak load cost and carbon tax rather than using the weighting method. The results of a case study in Higashida, Japan obviously evidenced the superiority of multi-objective optimization. Although the improvement of the peak shaving ability and emission reduction effect was partially at the expense of system cost benefit, the total cost under multi-criteria was still reduced by 2.13%, which indicates that the balance and optimization of the economic benefit, peak shaving and carbon reduction were realized. The effect of each evaluation criterion on the optimal configuration was analyzed by comparing the optimization results under objective functions with different criteria combinations. High requirements for carbon reduction can promote the development of renewable energy, and peak shaving ability should be ensured by controllable and stable power generators. • Analyze the characteristics of grid load for five multi-types buildings in Japan. • Propose evaluation criteria including, economic, peak shaving and CO 2 emission. • Introducing peak load price and CO 2 tax, evaluation criteria are converted into cost. • The configuration of microgrid is optimized quantitatively under multi-evaluation. • Effect of each criterion is carried out by comparing different criteria combinations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]