Search

Due to the profound impact that building sector has on the environment and consequently the sustainability of our society, the evaluation of environmental impacts through life cycle assessment (LCA) should become part of building design. The number of published environmental product declarations (EPDs) is growing, which indicates that they can become valuable tools for building designers to evaluate the environmental performance of construction works. We identified that in the current EPD scheme an important part is missing – the results interpretation. In order to evaluate the environmental performance of buildings or their components and elements, the designer is "forced" to conduct a comparative assertion on a population of alternatives. The paper explores the results interpretation of LCA data in the context of the EPD scheme for building products and presents a comparative assertion method, which could guide designers through the results interpretation step of LCA. The proposed soft comparative assertion method was tested on a sample of external wall assembly alternatives and the results show that it significantly simplifies the LCA results interpretation and enables straightforward decision making. However, the method is not yet a fully functional tool and should be upgraded in order to make the decision process more robust and less subjective. With this paper we wish to encourage further research on the described topic, which is vital in order to add credibility to the EPD scheme as an instrument for lowering the environmental impact of the building sector. • Evaluation of environmental impacts by LCA should become part of building design. • Comparative assertions required in order to evaluate LCA data from EPDs. • No guidelines for building designers at the LCA results interpretation step. • Presentation of comparative assertion method framework for building designers. • Developed method significantly simplifies the decision making process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years the use of wood based products in building industry has expanded. Although lightweight timber constructions essentially decrease environmental impact of a building, their consequential low thermal mass can lead to overheating during summer. Therefore, the purpose of this paper was to investigate various examples of enhanced lightweight constructions from the thermal response point of view. Several improvements were investigated (e.g. clay boards, wood wool thermal insulation, Phase Change Materials, etc.) and compared with the performance of a conventional thermally insulated high mass wall. Finite element model was created and dynamic thermal performance of enhanced lightweight external walls was analysed in three different European locations: Helsinki (Finland), Vienna (Austria) and Madrid (Spain). Certain enhancements resulted in lower internal surface temperature of constructions up to 1 °C, depending on location. In addition, it was shown that in order to further improve thermal performance, application of high intensity ventilation is necessary, which additionally lowered the internal surface temperature up to 8 °C. It was shown that enhanced and naturally cooled lightweight constructions are more suitable for locations with milder summer temperatures (Northern, Central Europe), rather than for hot climates (Mediterranean). It was concluded that the application of lightweight constructions should be thoughtful in order to achieve adequate thermal response of buildings. However, in lightweight buildings the integration of materials characterised by high thermal mass, high thermal effusivity and low environmental impact should be encouraged. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]