Search

Most studies to date have focused on liver stiffness measurement (LSM) in patients with different chronic liver diseases, and normal LSM is defined based on normal liver function tests or the absence of fibrosis. Very few studies have defined LSM based on completely normal liver biopsies. The current study was done to define the distribution of LSM values in individuals with normal liver biopsies. All prospective liver donors presenting to Medanta, the Medicity hospital between September 2020 and September 2021 fulfilling the eligibility criteria were included in this study. A total of 63 donors (36 females and 27 males) were included in the study, 37 (58.7%) donors had normal liver biopsies, and 26 (41.2%) donors showed the presence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. LSM values in the normal liver histology group were 5.01 ± 1.99 kPa by the M probe and 5.34 ± 2.25 kPa by the XL probe. Even though the correlation was weak (r = 0.29, P = 0.03), M probe LSM correlated positively with body mass index. There was a good correlation between the LSM measured by the M probe and the XL probe (r = 0.73, P = <0.001). LSM value in the biopsy-proven normal liver histology group was 5.01 ± 1.99 by the M probe and 5.34 ± 2.25 by the XL probe. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recurrent or de novo nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are common after liver transplantation (LT) and may be associated with rapid progression to fibrosis; however, there is limited data in this regard after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This is a retrospective study at a high volume LDLT center of all liver biopsies performed in patients with post-transplant NAFLD diagnosed on ultrasound of the abdomen. Liver biopsy was indicated for raised transaminases and/or high liver stiffness on TE. The association between these prebiopsy parameters and inflammation and fibrosis on histology was analyzed. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation or median (25–75 interquartile range). The study cohort consisted of 31 males and 3 females, aged 43 ± 10 years. The LT to liver biopsy interval was 44 (28–68) months. The prebiopsy AST and ALT were 71 (38–119) and 66 (50–156), respectively. The histology suggested no nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in 7 (20%), borderline NASH in 15 (44%), and NASH in 12 (35%) patients. A total of 15 patients (44%) had stage 1 or stage 2 fibrosis. The proportion of patients having fibrosis was significantly higher in patients with NASH (83%) compared to patients with borderline NASH (33%) or no NASH (none had fibrosis, P = 0.001). Among 18 patients who underwent TE (on FibroScan), liver stiffness was significantly higher in patients with fibrosis [18.1 (9.7–22.5)] than in those without fibrosis [9.7 (4.0–12.7); P = 0.043]. Over a third of the LDLT recipients with post-transplant NAFLD developed NASH, and nearly half, borderline NASH 3–5 years after transplant. Most with established NASH also had fibrosis on histology. Prevention of risk factors and early diagnosis is warranted in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ultrasound of the liver is not good to pick up mild steatosis. Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) evaluated in transient elastography (FibroScan) is widely available in India. However, data regarding the diagnostic accuracy and optimal cut-off values of CAP for diagnosing hepatic steatosis are scarce in Indian population. MRI-PDFF is an accurate technique for quantifying hepatic steatosis. Thus, this study examined the diagnostic accuracy and optimal cut-off values of CAP for diagnosing steatosis with MRI-PDFF as reference standard. A total of 137 adults underwent CAP and MRI-PDFF measurements prospectively. A subset of participants (n = 23) underwent liver biopsy as part of liver transplantation evaluation. The optimal cut-off values, area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves, sensitivity, and specificity for CAP in detecting MRI-PDFF ≥5% and ≥10% were assessed. The mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 44.2 ±10.4 years and 28.3 ±3.9 kg/m2, respectively. The mean hepatic steatosis was 13.0 ±7.7% by MRI-PDFF and 303 ±54 dB/m by CAP. The AUROC of CAP for detecting hepatic steatosis (MRI-PDFF ≥5%) was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.88–0.98) at the cut-off of 262 dB/m, and of MRI-PDFF ≥10% was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.84–0.94) at the cut-off of 295 dB/m. The CAP of 262 dB/m had 90% sensitivity and 91% specificity for detecting MRI-PDFF ≥5%, while the CAP of 295 dB/m had 86% sensitivity and 77% specificity for detecting MRI-PDFF ≥10%. The optimal cut-off of CAP for the presence of liver steatosis (MRI-PDFF ≥5%) was 262 dB/m in Indian individuals. This CAP cut-off was associated with good sensitivity and specificity to pick up mild steatosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Generally diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty disease is made on imaging, however, mild steatosis is difficult to diagnose on imaging. Liver biopsy is the procedure of choice but is not carried out as it is an invasive procedure. We describe our experience of 157 liver biopsies in living liver donors with normal body mass index (BMI) <23 kg/M2 (lean). The study was conducted at a tertiary care center in north India. Data of lean living donors who underwent a liver biopsy before donation were analyzed. Data are presented as percentage, mean, or median (25–75 interquartile range). Of 718 donors who had a liver biopsy before donation, 157 (21.8%) donors were lean (BMI < 23 kg/M2). Seventy-eight percent of lean donors had no or only one metabolic risk factor. Fifty-three (33.7%) of lean donors had nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) in liver biopsy. When donors with NAFL were compared to donors with normal histology, donors with NAFL had significantly higher aspartate transaminase (26.6 ± 7.5 versus 23.7 ± 5.4, p = 0.007), alanine transaminase (33.4 ± 11.7 versus 27.8 ± 10.7, p = 0.003), and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase [25 (16–40.5) versus 18 (14–23), p = 0.003]. Only triglycerides (TGs) were statistically different among metabolic factors in lean NAFL and normal histology groups, 97 (70–161) versus 86 (62.5–114.7), p = 0.043. A total of 30% donors in the lean NAFL group had TGs >150 mg/dl as compared with 12.5% in the normal histology group, p = 0.009. Other metabolic risk factors were not statistically different. One third of lean donors had NAFL. Among all metabolic risk factors, only higher TGs levels showed a significant association with NAFL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy is increasingly being performed at several centers. It is also being promoted at endoscopy conferences. The currently available literature does not support the routine use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy as results are either inferior or comparable to percutaneous liver biopsy. We discuss the technical limitations of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy when compared to percutaneous liver biopsy and the comparative studies in the current review. The routine use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy should be discouraged as it may get less tissue, the complication rate is similar and it is more costly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Liver steatosis is the leading cause of donor rejection in living donor liver transplantation. Rapid weight loss is difficult to achieve in a short period of time, moreover it has been thought to worsen liver histology. Methods Donors who had significant steatosis based on liver biopsy were recommended 1200 Kcal/day and a minimum of 60 min/day moderate cardio training. Two patients were advised statins for dyslipidemia. None of the donors had metabolic syndrome. A second ultrasound guided liver biopsy was done at 28 ± 10 days. Donors with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis/fibrosis or >30% steatosis were not included. Results From July 2010 to January 2015, 16 donors were advised aggressive life style modification after initial biopsy; 15 (10 males, age 27.5 ± 6.5 years, baseline body mass index 28.4 ± 2.1 Kg/M 2 ) successfully reduced weight and 14 underwent donation after favorable second biopsy. Mean weight loss was 7 ± 4.3 kg (8.4 ± 4.6%). Second liver biopsy was done at 28 ± 10 days, there was decrease in steatosis in all but one including normalization of liver biopsy in 7 donors. Three donors had mild inflammation on first biopsy and they had improvement in second biopsy. All the donors and their recipients had an uneventful post-operative course. Conclusion Steatosis can be reversed in a short duration by aggressive life style modifications in highly motivated liver donors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]