Search

Context: Whether testosterone (Te) depletion in aging men reflects deficits in the testis, hypothalamus, and/or pituitary gland is unknown., Objective: Our objective was to quantify the impact of age on gonadal Te secretion driven by amplitude-varying pulses of recombinant human LH (rhLH) in the absence of confounding by endogenous hypothalamo-pituitary signals., Design: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study., Setting: The setting was an academic medical center., Subjects: Fifteen healthy community-dwelling men ages 22-78 yr were included in the study., Intervention: Saline or four separate rhLH doses were each infused twice iv in randomized order as one pulse every 2 h over 20 h to stimulate Te secretion, after LH secretion was suppressed by a GnRH-receptor antagonist, ganirelix., Main Outcome: LH and Te concentrations were determined in blood samples collected every 5 min. Maximal and minimal (as well as mean) Te responses were regressed linearly on age to reflect LH peak and nadir (and average) effects, respectively., Results: The ganirelix/rhLH paradigm yielded serum LH concentrations of 4.6 +/- 0.22 IU/liter (normal range 1-9). By regression analysis, age was associated with declines in rhLH pulse-stimulated peak and nadir (and mean) concentrations of total Te (P = 0.0068), bioavailable Te (P = 0.0096), and free Te (P = 0.013), as well as lower Te/LH concentration ratios (P < 0.005). Deconvolution analysis suggested that the half-life of infused LH increases by 12%/decade (P = 0.044; R(2) = 0.28)., Conclusions: Infusion of amplitude-varying pulses of rhLH during gonadal-axis suppression in healthy men unmasks prominent age-related deficits in stimulated total (39%), bioavailable (66%), and free (63%) Te concentrations, and a smaller age-associated increase in LH half-life. These data suggest that age-associated factors reduce the efficacy of LH pulses.

Context: Ghrelin is a 28-amino-acid Ser(3)-octanoylated peptide, and CRH is a 41-amino-acid peptide, both of which stimulate ACTH secretion. In principle, actions of these agonists could be subject to inhibitory modulation by hypothalamic somatostatin (SS)., Objective: Our objective was to test the hypothesis that endogenous SS restrains ghrelin and CRH-stimulated ACTH secretion, thereby linking all three, ghrelin, CRH, and SS, with ACTH secretion., Design and Setting: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover interventional study at an academic medical center., Participants: Ten healthy postmenopausal women participated in the study., Interventions: Interventions included iv injection of saline, ghrelin, human CRH, or both after an infusion of saline vs. l-arginine to putatively inhibit SS outflow (eight visits per subject)., Outcome Measures: ACTH concentrations quantified by repetitive blood sampling and immunochemiluminometry., Results: Infusion of ghrelin induced peak ACTH concentrations [median (range)] of 21 (17-28) compared with 16 (11-20) ng/liter after saline (P = 0.037). CRH and l-arginine infusion evoked ACTH peaks of 23 (14-48) and 31 (21-286) ng/liter, respectively (P = 0.037 and P = 0.005 vs. saline). l-Arginine enhanced stimulation by ghrelin by 1.43-fold (P = 0.028) and that by CRH by 1.91-fold (P = 0.005). Triple stimulation with ghrelin, CRH, and l-arginine potentiated the effect of combined ghrelin/CRH by 1.45-fold (P = 0.028). Downstream cortisol responses mimicked those of ACTH but were time delayed., Conclusions: The present outcomes indicate that the peptide ensemble comprising ghrelin, CRH, and SS (inferred by l-arginine infusion) can regulate ACTH and cortisol secretion in healthy adults.

Context: Studies of how aging attenuates GH secretion are confounded by differences in sex-steroid milieus, abdominal visceral fat mass (AVF), and IGF-I concentrations and limited in interpretability by the use of pharmacological doses of secretagogues., Hypothesis: In a controlled estrogenic milieu, near-physiological secretagogue drive will unmask distinct influences of age, AVF, and IGF-I on GH secretion., Location: The study was conducted at an academic medical center., Subjects: Subjects included 10 healthy pre- (PRE) and 10 postmenopausal (POST) women., Procedure: In a defined estradiol (E(2)) milieu, we compared GH secretion after submaximal stimulation with GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-2 (ghrelin analog), GHRH, and l-arginine (an inhibitor of somatostatin outflow)., Analysis: We related GH responses to age stratum (dichotomous variable) and AVF and IGF-I concentrations (continuous variables)., Results: In the face of comparable concentrations of E(2), testosterone, and SHBG: 1) age (P < 0.001) and secretagogue type (P < 0.001) independently determined GH secretion; 2) GH responses in POST subjects were only 26-33% of those in PRE (P < or = 0.002) across all secretagogues; 3) POST women lost the PRE order of secretagogue potency (GHRP-2 > GHRH = l-arginine); and 4) in the combined cohorts, higher AVF predicted reduced l-arginine-stimulated GH secretion (R(2) = 0.46, P = 0.0013), whereas higher IGF-I concentrations forecast increased GHRP-2 and GHRH drive (R(2) > or = 0.52, P < or = 0.013)., Conclusion: A paradigm of near-physiological secretagogue drive in an E(2)-clamped milieu unmasks tripartite deficits in peptide-signaling pathways in healthy POST, compared with PRE, women. Post hoc analyses indicate that both greater visceral adiposity and lower IGF-I concentrations mark this triple regulatory defect.

Context: Ghrelin and an estrogen-rich milieu individually amplify pulsatile GH secretion by increasing the amount of hormone released per burst. However, how these distinct agonists interact in controlling pulsatile GH output is not known., Objective: The objective of the study was to test the hypothesis that elevated estradiol (E(2)) concentrations potentiate hypothalamo-pituitary responses to a near-physiological ghrelin stimulus., Design: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospectively randomized, parallel-cohort study., Setting: The study was conducted at an academic medical center., Subjects: Twenty-one postmenopausal women participated in the study., Interventions: Eleven subjects received placebo (Pl) and 10 others E(2) transdermally in escalating doses over 3 wk to mimic late follicular-phase E(2) concentrations. Saline or a submaximally stimulatory amount of ghrelin (0.3 microg/kg) was infused iv on separate randomly ordered mornings fasting after 17-21 d of Pl or E(2) administration., Outcomes: Outcomes included serum concentrations of E(2), ghrelin, GH, IGF-I, IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-1 and IGFBP-3, and the estimated mass and waveform of stimulated GH secretory bursts., Results: Administration of E(2) yielded late follicular-phase E(2) concentrations. Compared with Pl, E(2) did not alter ghrelin concentrations but reduced IGF-I and IGFBP-3 and elevated IGFBP-1 concentrations. Compared with saline, ghrelin infusion amplified pulsatile GH secretion by 7.1-fold (P < 0.01). The effect of E(2) alone was 2.0-fold placebo and that of combined ghrelin/E(2) 10.4-fold (P < 0.01). Ghrelin and E(2) accelerated initial GH release individually but nonadditively by more than 2-fold (P < 0.01)., Conclusions: Estrogen augments ghrelin's near-physiological stimulation of pulsatile GH secretion and mimics ghrelin's acceleration of initial GH release. Thus, we hypothesize that estrogen and a GH secretagogue act via independent as well as convergent mechanisms.

Context: Ghrelin is a 28-amino acid, Ser(3)-octanoylated peptide that stimulates GH secretion in vivo and in vitro. Beyond the capability of ghrelin to synergize with GHRH, little is known about multipeptide modulation of ghrelin's actions in humans., Objective: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that ghrelin can stimulate GH secretion in the absence or presence of somatostatin withdrawal (induced by l-arginine infusion) and stress-like drive by CRH., Design: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over interventional study., Setting: This study was performed at an academic medical center., Participants: Nine healthy postmenopausal women not receiving sex hormones were studied., Interventions: Subjects were given an iv infusion of saline and/or l-arginine or human CRH, followed by a bolus iv injection of ghrelin., Outcome Measures: The outcome measures were pulsatile GH secretion quantified by repetitive blood sampling, immunochemiluminometry, and deconvolution analysis., Results: Consecutive saline/ghrelin infusion increased pulsatile GH secretion from 2.7 +/- 1.0 (saline/saline; mean +/- sem) to 20 +/- 5.0 microg/liter.3 h (P < 0.01). The magnitude of the effect of l-arginine/saline was comparable at 20 +/- 4.5 microg/liter.3 h (P < 0.01). In contrast, sequential l-arginine/ghrelin evoked true synergy of GH release (93 +/- 14 microg/liter.3 h; P = 0.003 vs. l-arginine alone and P = 0.008 vs. ghrelin alone). Human CRH did not affect GH responses to saline/saline (3.9 +/- 1.1 microg/liter.3 h), saline/ghrelin (19 +/- 3.3 microg/liter.3 h), l-arginine/saline (16 +/- 2.7 microg/liter.3 h), or l-arginine/ghrelin (90 +/- 13 microg/liter.3 h)., Conclusions: Assuming that l-arginine reduces somatostatin outflow, we infer that ghrelin can activate hypothalamo-pituitary pathways that are both dependent upon and independent of somatostatinergic restraint even in the face of a strong stress-related signal.

Background: Aging, body composition, and sex steroids jointly determine GH production. However, the actions of any given factor are confounded by the effects of the other two., Hypothesis: Age and abdominal visceral fat (AVF) mass govern GH secretion via individually distinctive mechanisms, which can be unmasked by short-term sex steroid deprivation., Design/subjects: In a university setting, healthy pre- and postmenopausal volunteers underwent GnRH agonist-induced down-regulation for 6 wk to deplete ovarian sex steroids. GH secretion was evaluated by frequent blood sampling, saline vs. dual secretagogue infusions, an irregularity statistic, variable waveform deconvolution analysis, and a simplified feedback model. Computerized tomography was used to estimate AVF mass. OUTCOMES/MEASURES: In the sex steroid-deficient milieu, postmenopausal compared with premenopausal women exhibited 1) lower concentrations of IGF-I (P = 0.028) and GH (P < 0.05); 2) reduced pulsatile, but elevated basal, GH secretion (P < 0.05); 3) more irregular GH patterns (P = 0.027); 4) an attenuated GH response to simultaneous GHRH/GH-releasing peptide-2 stimulation (P < 0.01); and 5) more rapid onset of GH release within secretory bursts (P < 0.01). In contrast, AVF negatively forecast GH responses to L-arginine/GH-releasing peptide-2 (r2= 0.45; P < 0.001) and L-arginine/GHRH (r2= 0.57; P = 0.007). From these marked contrasts, model-based analyses predicted distinguishable mechanisms by which aging and AVF alter pulsatile GH production., Conclusion: Under limited confounding by sex steroids, age and body composition modulate GH secretion via highly selective peptidyl pathways in healthy women.

The present study tests the hypothesis that estradiol (E(2)), compared with placebo (Pl), amplifies combined-secretagogue stimulation of GH secretion in premenopausal women studied at comparable IGF-I and testosterone concentrations. To this end, 13 women underwent GnRH agonist-induced gonadal down-regulation followed by graded transdermal addback of E(2) or Pl and randomly ordered iv infusions of saline or paired secretagogues on separate morning fasting. GH secretion was assessed by frequent blood sampling, immunochemiluminometry, and variable-waveform deconvolution analysis. Two-way ANOVA revealed that specific secretagogue combination (P < 0.001), E(2) status (P = 0.012), and their interaction (P = 0.038) jointly determined GH secretory-burst mass. Compared with Pl, the E(2)-clamped milieu elevated mean fasting GH concentrations (P = 0.032), the mass of GH secreted in bursts (P = 0.037), and maximal stimulation by paired l-arginine/GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-2 (P = 0.028). E(2) also markedly accelerated the initial release of GH induced by GHRH/GHRP-2 (P < 0.001) and l-arginine/GHRH (P < 0.01). By linear regression analysis, E(2) concentrations positively forecast 41% of intersubject variability in GH secretion stimulated by combined l-arginine/GHRP-2 (P = 0.018), whereas abdominal visceral-fat mass negatively predicted 49% of that due to l-arginine/GHRH (P = 0.012). These data indicate that pulsatile GH secretion in young women studied at constant IGF-I and testosterone concentrations is dictated 3-fold jointly by secretagogue pair, E(2) availability, and intraabdominal adiposity. Moreover, the rapidity of GH release is controlled 2-fold jointly by E(2) and GHRH.

We show that in an experimentally enforced estradiol-predominant milieu, postmenopausal compared with premenopausal women maintain 1) decreased fasting GH and IGF-I concentrations, 2) reduced basal and pulsatile GH secretion, and 3) attenuated GH secretion after maximal stimulation by the paired secretagogues l-arginine/GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-2, l-arginine/GHRH, and GHRP-2/GHRH. These foregoing outcomes are selective, because menopausal status did not determine mean GH secretory-burst frequency or peptide-induced waveform shortening. Abdominal visceral fat mass predicted up to 25% of the variability in fasting and stimulated GH secretion in the combined cohorts under fixed systemic estradiol availability. Accordingly, as much as three-fourths of interindividual differences in burst-like GH secretion among healthy pre- and postmenopausal women arise from age-related mechanisms independently of short-term systemic estrogen availability and relative intraabdominal adiposity.