41 results on '"Altman, Douglas G"'
Search Results
2. Reporting guidelines of health research studies are frequently used inappropriately
3. Reporting of randomized factorial trials was frequently inadequate
4. A cross-sectional bibliometric study showed suboptimal journal endorsement rates of STROBE and its extensions
5. Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis
6. Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions
7. CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document
8. Rating of Included Trials on the Efficacy–Effectiveness Spectrum: development of a new tool for systematic reviews
9. Peer reviewers identified spin in manuscripts of nonrandomized studies assessing therapeutic interventions, but their impact on spin in abstract conclusions was limited
10. Adequate sample size for developing prediction models is not simply related to events per variable
11. CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: explanation and elaboration
12. CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement
13. A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity
14. Deficiencies in the publication and reporting of the results of systematic reviews presented at scientific medical conferences
15. Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement
16. Scientific hypotheses can be tested by comparing the effects of one treatment over many diseases in a systematic review
17. Pragmatic trials can be designed as optimal medical care: principles and methods of care trials
18. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development
19. Randomized trials published in higher vs. lower impact journals differ in design, conduct, and analysis
20. Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review
21. Reviews assessing the quality or the reporting of randomized controlled trials are increasing over time but raised questions about how quality is assessed
22. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
23. CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
24. Development and validation of a prediction model with missing predictor data: a practical approach
25. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration
26. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
27. Reporting on blinding in trial protocols and corresponding publications was often inadequate but rarely contradictory
28. A pragmatic–explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers
29. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
30. Assessing risk of bias in studies that evaluate health care interventions: recommendations in the misinformation age
31. Developing a prognostic model in the presence of missing data: an ovarian cancer case study
32. Reply to letter to the editor by C. Faggion: reproducibility and reporting guidelines
33. CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement
34. CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: explanation and elaboration
35. Erratum to: “CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials” [J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63(8):e1–37]
36. Letter to the Editor
37. Within Trial Variation—A False Trail?
38. Adequate sample size for developing prediction models is not simply related to events per variable
39. Modeling the effects of continuous risk factors
40. Scientific hypotheses can be tested by comparing the effects of one treatment over many diseases in a systematic review.
41. Prognosis research: toward evidence-based results and a Cochrane methods group.
Catalog
Books, media, physical & digital resources
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.