Search

Background: Today, single-inhaler ICS/LAMA/LABA (SITT) COPD therapies are available. It is unclear whether they are more effective than multiple-device triple therapies (MITT) in improving COPD outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively considered patients on SITT/MITT in 2019/2020 who were prescribed >7 packages of ICS/LABA/LAMA or ICS/LAMA (+LAMA). The two treatments were compared concerning systemic corticosteroids, antibiotics, salbutamol, antifungal prescriptions, and number of emergency room visits/hospitalizations (ERV/Hs). We studied 292 MITT patients (Group A) during 2019, switching to SITT in 2020, and 366 subjects (Group B) who took SITT during 2019, and 206 MITT individuals (Group C) in 2020. Results: ICS/LABA + LAMA (MITT) package use was 8.2 ± 4.2 and 7.85 ± 4 in 2019, switching to 11.2 ± 3.2 when patients shifted to SITT in 2020 (p = 0.0001). Group A MITT package use was lower than in SITT patients in 2019 (9.31 ± 2.71, p = 0.0001; Group B). Throughout 2020, Group C (10.3 ± 6.1 packs) adherence to ICS/LABA was similar to SITT adherence in Group A (p = 0.270), whereas LAMA package use (9.1 ± 5) was lower (p = 0.0038). Patients using systemic corticosteroids/antibiotics were fewer in SITT in 2020, compared to the MITT results in 2019. Subjects with fewer ERV/Hs were observed with SITT rather than with MITT. Particularly, 13.8% of patients needed ≥2 ERV/Hs when treated with SITT, whereas 19.2% needed ≥2 ERV/Hs with MITT in 2019 (p = 0.08). Multivariate analysis, adjusted for all confounding factors including treatment adherence, showed that MITT (vs. SITT) can have an increased risk of at least one ERV/H (subjects receiving MITT during 2019 passing to SITT in 2020, OR: 1.718 [1.010–2.924], p = 0.046; Group A/MITT/2019 vs. Group B/SITT/2019, OR: 1.650 [0.973–3.153], p = 0.056; Group C/MITT/2020 vs. Group B/SITT/2019, OR: 1.908 [1.018–3.577], p = 0.044). Conclusions: SITT therapy may promote treatment adherence more effectively, therefore, reducing COPD exacerbations better than MITT. A possible synergistic effect of ICS/LABA/LAMA intake with a single device might be another cause of SITT's greater efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third cause of mortality and it is smoking-related. It is characterized by a non-reversible airflow limitation and a progressive worsening of the respiratory function. Objective: The aim of this study is to point out the benefit of smoking cessation combined with a single inhaler triple therapy in terms of clinical and functional outcome in this setting. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in patients affected by severe COPD and at least one exacerbation a year, who underwent a smoking cessation program. All patients underwent a 6 min walking test, body plethysmography, and an exhaled test for carbon monoxide. The modified medical research council test (mMRC) test, the Fagestrom nicotine dependency test (FTND) and the COPD assessment test (CAT) questionnaire were also administered. All patients were checked at the baseline and in the six-month follow-up after the start of the treatment. Results: Smoking cessation was achieved by 51% of patients within a month and it was confirmed by eCO measure (<7 ppm). Patients who quit smoking reported better results after six months compared with patients who did not. The increase in FEV1 within the group of quitters was 90 mL (p < 0.05) and the walking test improved by 90 m (p < 0.01); eCO decreased by 15 ppm (p < 0.01) while FVC increased by 70 mL (p < 0.05). No significant changes were recorded within the group of sustainers. The difference in functional changes between groups was significant with regard to FEV1, cCO, and WT. Conclusions: Smoking cessation enhances the efficacy of single inhaler triple therapy, improving clinical and functional variables after six months from the start. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]