Search

Background/Objectives: Data on the real-world effectiveness and safety of selective JAK inhibitors (JAKis) in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are limited. Methods: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective study to assess clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic outcomes of selective JAKis in bio-experienced UC and CD. Results: A total of 246 patients (mean age: 40.5 ± 14.5 years; 131 UC and 115 CD) were included with a median follow-up of 7.5 months. Among the CD patients receiving upadacitinib (n = 115), 76.2% achieved clinical remission (CR) at week 12. Furthermore, 59.5% of the upadacitinib-treated UC patients (n = 100) experienced CR at week 8. Corticosteroid-free CR (CSFCR) was achieved by 76.9% of the CD patients and 80.6% of the UC patients at week 24, while 50.0% and 36.1% experienced endoscopic remission. At week 52, 66.7% of the CD and 86.2% of the UC patients achieved CSFCR, whereas 54.5% and 52.9% had endoscopic remission. In UC, the effectiveness of upadacitinib was not compromised by prior tofacitinib failure, while the upadacitinib-treated CD patients with stricturing and penetrating disease were less likely to achieve CR by the end of the induction phase (p = 0.04). C-reactive protein (p[CD] < 0.0001; p[UC] < 0.0001) and faecal calprotectin (p[CD] < 0.0001; p[UC] = 0.02) decreased significantly in both patient groups as early as week 2. Among the filgotinib-treated UC patients (n = 31), 28.6% were in CR at week 12. At week 24 and 52, 59.1% and 60% achieved CSFCR, while 0.0% and 20.0% had endoscopic remission. Both C-reactive protein (p = 0.04) and faecal calprotectin (p = 0.04) decreased significantly by week 12. Hyperlipidaemia (9.7–9.8%) was the most common adverse event. Conclusions: Selective JAKis are rapidly effective and safe for treating refractory, moderate-to-severe CD and UC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are complex, multifactorial chronic inflammatory disorders affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Their epidemiology, particularly for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), is increasing worldwide, with a rise in the co-diagnosis of IBD and EGIDs. Both disorders share common risk factors, such as early exposure to antibiotics or specific dietary habits. Moreover, from a molecular perspective, eosinophilic infiltration is crucial in the diagnosis of eosinophilic disorders, and it also plays a pivotal role in IBD histological diagnosis. Indeed, recent evidence highlights the significant role of eosinophils in the health of the intestinal mucosal barrier and as mediators between innate and acquired immunity, even indicating a potential role in IBD pathogenesis. This narrative review aims to summarize the current evidence regarding the common clinical and molecular aspects of EGIDs and IBD and the current state of knowledge regarding overlap conditions and their pathogenesis. Methods: Pubmed was searched until May 2023 to assess relevant studies describing the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and therapy of EGIDs in IBD. Results: The immune pathways and mechanisms underlying both EGIDs and IBD remain partially known. An improved understanding of the role of eosinophils in overlapping conditions could lead to enhanced diagnostic precision, the development of more effective future therapeutic strategies, and a more accurate prediction of patient response. Consequently, the identification of red flags indicative of an eosinophilic disorder in IBD patients is of paramount importance and must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]