1. Detection of Plasmodium Infection by the illumigene Malaria Assay Compared to Reference Microscopy and Real-Time PCR.
- Author
-
Rypien C, Chow B, Chan WW, Church DL, and Pillai DR
- Subjects
- Adult, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Malaria, Falciparum parasitology, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques economics, Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques economics, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Young Adult, Malaria, Falciparum diagnosis, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques methods, Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques methods, Plasmodium falciparum genetics
- Abstract
Malaria is one of the leading causes of infectious disease in travelers returning from the tropics. The diagnosis of malaria is typically performed by examining Giemsa-stained thick and thin peripheral blood smears, which is time consuming, labor intensive, and requires high levels of proficiency. Alternatively, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is a new molecular method, which is rapid, sensitive, and requires less capital equipment and technological training. We conducted a retrospective study comparing two formats of a commercial LAMP assay (Meridian illumi gene malaria [M] and malaria Plus [MP]) versus reference microscopy on archived blood specimens ( n = 140) obtained from unique returning travelers suspected of having malaria. Discrepant results were resolved by either repeat testing or a laboratory developed ultrasensitive real-time PCR method. On initial testing, the Meridian illumi gene M and MP kits had sensitivities of 97.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.7 to 99.7%) and 100.0% (95.1 to 100.0%) and specificities of 93.8% (84.8 to 98.3%) and 91.5% (81.3 to 97.2%), respectively, versus reference microscopy. We project a significant cost reduction in low prevalence settings where malaria is not endemic with LAMP-based malaria screening given the excellent negative predictive value achieved with LAMP., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF